Policy decisions should be made against
verifiable facts only.
Not exact matches
Often we are faced with disparate information, incomplete data,
only parts of the puzzle rather than the whole, or hints and innuendo rather than
verifiable fact, and then are required to make important investment decisions where the downside if we get it wrong can be quite painful.
There again Michael you are confusing Roman culture and Greek culture... there is not
fact and
verifiable to your claim
only random hypothosis motivated by an emotional sinful culture to change Jesus» words... instead of proof texting take all the text together they all condition that marraige is between man and woman... and unless you can have babies your arguement is futile.
Who would suspect from this statement that biologists of the stature of Ludwig von Bertalanffy had been writing: «I think the
fact that a theory so vague, so insufficiently
verifiable and so far from the criteria otherwise applied in «hard» science has become a dogma can
only be explained on sociological grounds»?
Wright holds that it deals not with things in themselves, but with the contents of the minds of normal observers, and in
fact only those contents which are
verifiable by other persons.
As long as the law maintains
only a hazy line between, on the one hand,
verifiable allegations of
fact and, on the other hand, expressions of opinion, speakers and writers remain unsure about what they may and may not say.
About the
only verifiable fact in the film is the wonderfully fascinating first act which takes place at the premier of The Rite of Spring in Paris where the audience actually did go into a riot over the music and choreography.
Not
only do I fully agree with MarkCoker's post below, I would like very much to know where the author of this article got his information, because to present statements like the ones made in this article, a person should have some
verifiable proof of the
facts stated.
Others bend over backward to assure
only verifiable facts get reported, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.
In Florida, it seems that the
only permissible advertising is a statement of objectively
verifiable facts.
So if eye - witness accounts in Gaza were were coerced, then those tricky Hamas thugs somehow knew in advance exactly what would be visible on the UNISAT footage, and cunningly forced people to lie exactly (and
only) in ways that would turn out to be compatible with the independently
verifiable facts about e.g. the destruction of civilian industrial and agricultural facilities.