Sentences with phrase «verifiable measurement»

So, please, if you're not able to provide verifiable measurements contradicting the information in this article then don't send me slander, accusations and hate mail.

Any verifiable measurements about how «on track» we are?

Thousands of scientists have been searching for decades for empirical, verifiable measurements attributable to AGW [and which can not be attributed to other factors, such as UHI].

I would admit that Nuccitelli is right when / if verifiable measurements of AGW are produced, tested, and found to be attributable specifically to human activity.

That fact proves that there are no verifiable measurements of AGW: QED.

So I agree that «there are no verifiable, testable AGW measurements», but I would also say that there are also no verifiable measurements that disprove AGW.

Not exact matches

And the introduction of new international energy management standards like ISO 50001 and the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP), which rely heavily on verifiable and robust data collection are opening up new avenues for further innovation and development of aM & T.

What «repeatable verifiable quantitative measurements to assess material facts» have you that the CO2 I breath out is pollution and that you have a right to penalise me for keeping warm, mobile and fed by emitting CO2?

Scientists use repeatable verifiable quantitative measurements to assess material facts.

But there are plenty of verifiable real world measurements showing the effect of temperature on CO2.

But as I keep pointing out, there are no verifiable, testable measurements quantifying MMGW.

If there were verifiable AGW measurements, then the question of the climate sensitivity number for 2xCO2 would be decisively answered.

And the reason is that there are no verifiable, testable AGW measurements.

Without quantifiable, verifiable and testable measurements of AGW, the question of the climate sensitivity number will remain unanswerd.