Sentences with phrase «verified predictions made»

What you need to do is look at the verified predictions made by climate models.

Not exact matches

Evolution makes predictions about what we would expect to see in the fossil record, comparative anatomy, genetic sequences, geographical distribution of species, etc., and these predictions have been verified many times over.

If the theory allows one to make predictions which are subsequently verified, it is further strengthened.

Causality must be proved for each parameter, not by a reduction of the residuals and variance only, but by making a prediction and verifying that a true manipulation of the factor (s) produces the expected results.

creationism has nothing at all and has never been verified and can not make any prediction, it is not a theory any more than say which type of wood makes a better magic wand.

These predictions, made using powerful computers, were verified using highly precise measurements taken using an extremely sensitive technique called «cavity - ring down spectroscopy».

Then you can make very clear predictions about what certain changes mean and verify those things experimentally.

I'm excited to have a theory of fairness for a free market economy that is analytical and quantitative, and makes testable predictions that can be verified with real - world data on income inequality.»

The p - wave symmetry of SRO has never been fully verified, partly hindered by the fact that SRO is a bulky crystal, which makes it challenging to fabricate into the type of devices necessary to test theoretical predictions.

This can mean a variety of things, but, most importantly, it means the model makes predictions that can be verified in a controlled experimental setting.

But it might make other predictions that can be verified.

We can't actually detect quarks, but it doesn't matter; we know QCD is correct, because it makes predictions that we can verify.

Predictions related to the impact of pinatubo, post 1984 trends, the «satellite cooling» mismatch, lgm tropical sst, water vapor increases, ocean heat content etc have all been made and verified within a short time period.

Of course, there is that small matter of all those verifiable (and verified) predictions the scientists have made.

So, Jacob, if you can show me a theory that makes as much sense of Earth's climate and makes as many verified predictions as the current consensus model and which doesn't imply serious problems due to warming, I'll be the first to pat you on the back.

That is an excellent example of good science: based on measurements of carbon dioxide and temperature, and on our understanding from basic physics of the interactions between carbon dioxide and light, Hansen made a bold prediction that could be tested and verified experimentally over time.

Models are verified by making correct predictions.

The science has been peer reviewed, independently verified, and the predictions made by CRU have already come to pass.

It was falsifiable, and deliberately contained the seeds of its own potential destruction by making predictions that could be verified by experiment.

That is why making a prediction of what is going to happen 100 years from now, or something which is so vague that it is not obvious it has occurred like «climate Change» are not acceptable in Science as they can not be verified.

Furthermore, if ONE Global Climate Model was verified — if it produced useful predictions (that's in advance and all...: — RRB --RRB- I'd be impressed and more likely to consider it a useful tools in unravelling our climate, assessing risk benefits, and in making policy decisions.

Given the large uncertainties in the model input parameters as documented in Chapter 8 of the IPCC FAR 2007, the fall in the effective global temperature as published by the Hadley Centre and GSS for 2007/2008, which was not predicted by the models, why are there no definitive studies being made of other model predictions to verify their accuracy?

Well, speaking only of Queensland, Chapter 11 of AR4 WG1, Regional Climate Projections, was very careful to make no specific projections for Australia and Queensland until 2080 - 2099 -LRB-(fig. 11.17), by when only those under 30 now are likely to be alive to verify whether its actual prediction of NO FLOODS in the Western Pacific proved correct: ALL 21 of the models deployed to make that prediction actually forecast precipitation at LESS than the average in 1980 - 1999.

This climate modeling capability made it possible to perform a real - time climate change prediction (verified by subsequent observations) of the global cooling and stratospheric heating (and return to normal) following to the 1991 Pinatubo volcanic eruption.

We think scientists should be using the working theory to make predictions for the future that can be measured and verified — preferably as clearly as possible in advance that success can be properly lauded.

If AGW is a testable hypothesis, it will make predictions that can be agreed and verified.

In particular, good models make strong predictions that can be verified by previously unobserved data.