Sentences with phrase «verify god or gods»

Reason is the default position so until I can come up with tangible physical evidence that he can verify God or gods simply do not have meaning other than sociological implications of religion.

Not exact matches

What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already, without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never seen or heard from any gods nor have I seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed proof.

It's simply preposterous that these ancient Hebrews that you consider to be ever - so holy, prescient, prophetic, wise, and all - around the cat's meow — and guaranteed not to rust, bust, collect dust, bruise, bend or tear, — all of a sudden become «disobedient» and «willful», when they were right there on the spot to witness (or allegedly to easily verify) this «Messiah» / «God» character within their midst.

Hearing radio interference and thinking it's screams of hell in no way verifies your claim of god, the bible, hell or anything else.

In fact, if he is to be true to the scientific method, he can not bring God into the picture even if he wanted to, for by the methods of science, there is no way of verifying whether God is present or not.

Hence, to use the present and its language structure as a basis for verifying whether God is real or not is doomed to fail, for God, who by presupposition is the most fully empirical, can not be found in the region that is partially empirical.

Belief is a poor way to verify the truth or existence of anything, god or gods included.

I only ask because it would seem you are saying that due to the nature of God we have no way to test for or verify the existence of the spirit realm, thus you have assigned those unknowable spirits superpowers the likes of which might be better found on the pages on a comic book or in ancient fairy tales.

Islam mentioned this for the longest time and as you can imagine, at a time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him), from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.

A lovely little tale... problem is, there is no verified evidence for supernatural beings - angels, gods, demons, spirits (holy or otherwise).

We also can not verify how «god» feels about abortion, gay rights, euthanasia, immigrants, war, or any other BS.

I am not trying to prove that the Qur» an is the word of God using scientific knowledge as a yard stick because any yardstick is supposed to be more superior than what is being checked or verified.

Question: Why does god allows so much confusion over his plan and will when he could have just made it like math or chemistry --- verified by measurable experiment?

Some might claim this is agnosticism but it is not as an agnostic believes there may or may not be God's but we have no way of verifying it so they see no reason to commit.

But if there is a God and He created the universe, who are we to question how He moves or to insist that He moves in a particular way so that we can verify it?

I'm simply saying that if we start at a supposition that the God of Abraham did create this universe, and that the flood story might be true, then what evidence do we have in any direction about his possible past dealings or ethics that can be verified?

Just as it is impossible to demonstrate the existence of God by either strictly empirical or logical evidence, so it is impossible to verify that a person has been confronted by God.

However, the accounts of God telling a person in the Old Testament to lead the Israelites to kill another group of people can not be verified as they were often individual appearances, dreams, visions, or «feelings» to a single person, leader, priest, or king.

And its accuracy can not be verified as concerns the divinity of Jesus or the existence of a god.

Every so called religious person or scholar obviously knows nothing about the word of God, since he / she / it has never verified to anyone that he / she / it even exists let alone personally wrote or directed to be written anything.

There are no measurements that can be made to verify the god hypothesis or falsify the god hypothesis, which means that the hypothesis is untestable, so you might as well say that an invisible and undetectable sky wizard chanted magic spells to create the universe... oh, wait... that's precisely what you are saying.

Like when people say they «know god helped them», or «know god exists», or «the bible is historically verified».

The emphasis on God's immanence should be noted, because most of the attempts to show that God is dead or that assertions about him can not be verified are directed toward God as transcendent only.

If God be in anything or anyone, He will verify that fact as we attempt to follow.

There is no verified evidence that any «God» ever spoke to Moses or any other ancient Jew.

What can we measure in order to verify or falsify your claim that god exists?.