Sentences with phrase «verse from the context»

You can not separate this verse from the context of the killing of another human.

Not exact matches

Read a verse from Quran, in context of Quran Burning idea by that Pastor.

, in the name of your creator, who created man from a clot...», [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FUTtKFH-KU] so rather than quoting what the terrorists quote (who BTW are misleading muslims and opponents alike, by reading verses out of context), use your logic, use your intelligence, read and understand.

I noted how you ripped that out of context to try to discredit it... plus... the verses yoi posted from Psalms..

However, if you sincerely set out to understand the Bible, considering the context and counterbalancing verses from elsewhere in the Bible, and then allow that perspective to shape your opinions, then sure.

Years ago, as I was looking at one of the three Bible verses that instruct wives to submit to their husbands — the one from 1 Peter that says, «Wives, in the same way submit yourselves to your own husbands» (3:1)-- my inductive Bible study skills kicked in, and I dutifully looked back a few verses to see what Peter meant by «in the same way» — you know, to get some context.

A proper understanding of the context reveals that pastors can not use this verse to encourage greater generosity in tithing, but instead, the pastor should give sacrificially from his own income to help the poor and needy in the church, as well as those who partner with him in the ministry.

Using a few verses out of context from Malachi only proves another commenter's idea on manipulation (read Malachi and hear God's real dissapointment).

Of believers / the godly / the just to whom he is writing, he uses the pronoun «you» (v. 1,3,13) But of the ungodly / the wicked / those who are reserved by God for judgment / the ungodly / etc the writer always designates such by the pronouns «them», «these», «their» and «they» (v. 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,2021,22) So your theory that the false teachers of verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the context!

I believe that while the apostle Paul instructed some women not to teach, he encouraged others to prophesy, teach, and lead, and so we have to look at the epistles in their totality and in their context rather than lifting a few verses out to restrict women from preaching the gospel.

You obviously do not get the context of the verse you quoted from the Bible.

The bible studied correctly, letting every verse from Genesis to Revelation related to a given subject have its say in its context, results in very little controversy..

Not only that, but two of the verses we quote out of context come from a passage where we are not to hypocritically condemn others yet do the same things ourselves!

I know that there are several verses in the Bible that some use to argue for the idea that Jesus had to shed His blood to purchase forgiveness of sins from God, but when carefully studied in their contexts, none of these Bible passages are teaching this idea.

the context of this verse, and the entire passage from Lev.

I put forward a case for an approach based on «freedom from oppression that Jesus talks of» — it would be a simple case of quoting the verse and context.

But I fail to see how a single verse like Luke 17:34 (which in context has little or no bearing on homosexual marriage / behavior), or even several bare verses from various places in Scripture that are often quoted on this issue, make for worthwhile conversation.

They read these verses thinking that the word «save» means «deliverance from hell, entrance into heaven, justification, or receiving eternal life,» when in reality, the context indicates otherwise.

If I'm just commenting right now I think that most doctrinal error comes from people looking at only the English version of some versus, and that verse in alone excluding context, but making sure that the Greek originals line up with their view based off English helps a lot.

I am copying these verses again here for those who will be confused from my out of context posting here.

Further, it makes no sense in that verse to understand repentance in that context; how would an inability to turn from sin be analogous to re crucifying Christ, the ultimate atonement for sin?

My rather uneducated stab at a paraphrase would include the preceding verse to make more sense of it in context as follows (borrowing partly from the ESV here): ``... and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.

We struggle with biblicism when we turn the Bible into a weapon, when we proof text, when we take verses from Jeremiah and the Psalms out of context and plaster them on our day calendars and coffee mugs.

The moment I realized I couldn't win a «proof text» war with a slave - owner was the moment I realized that in discussions like these, we can't rely on a few Bible verses pulled from their context — not when lives are at stake.

And in a sense this comment is true: interpret the biblical verse or the brief narrative or in a couple of instances even the Old Testament book in isolation and it becomes in meaning something totally different from what was clearly its intent in context.

This happens whenever a woman is presented with a universal statement about the «biblical» role of women in the world, which is typically extrapolated from a single biblical text without regard to literary or historical context and followed by a parenthetical string of additional unrelated and out - of - context Bible verses for support.

What he seems to miss is that David only did 24/7 worship on special occasions, and the verse from Revelation he uses to endorse 24/7 is also taken far out of it's context.

The church is made up of humans, therefore faults are inevitable, and yes the fundamental church have taken some stands that are not biblical, infact if you read the bible and read the chapters, not just the verses they claim their beliefs come from, you will realise that alot of fundamentalists take the scripture out of context, telling the churcht hat the bible tells us one thing when infact it tells us another.

For them, every verse, sentence, or phrase could be taken, out of context if need be, and its reference to Christ extracted by what seems to us at times over-ingenious exposition, but which, given the thought - forms of the day, simply sprang naturally from their exuberant and untiring obsession with the gospel.

If we look at the context of this verse in John, we find that the subject of discussion seems to change from Word through Life to Light, and that nothing more is directly stated about the Word until we reach the sentence which says that «the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory.»

I'm not yet versed in metabolic differences when it comes to diet but undoubtedly from a logistics perspective there are many people who would love to eat healthier but getting to even 30 % WFPB each day is a tall order of change in the context of their life (routines, expenses, knowledge) and so they really never start.