Sentences with phrase «version history of»

While still in Word, you are able to view the version history of a document and perform «red - line changes», where you compare different versions of the document and merge any changes into one version.
This page has a short version history of the Android OS.

Not exact matches

Back in 2006, Evans was studying law at Melbourne's Monash University while also organizing a charity music gig, an Australian version of the Make Poverty History concerts that had started in the U.K..
If, as Yeo said, a version of the technology is «already out there,» Theranos» innovation may be a lab that implements a new form of that technology in an elegant and efficient way, putting it into action on a commercial scale for the first time in history.
If history is our guide, he'll likely kick off his talk with how well Apple has done at getting its customers to run the latest versions of iOS and OS X, how many apps are available in the company's App Store, uptick in Apple TV usage, and perhaps most importantly to developers, how much the iPhone maker has doled out to the software makers as part of their revenue - sharing agreement.
The Low Documentation Loan (LowDoc) Program is a simplified version of the 7 (a) loan for businesses with strong credit histories seeking less than $ 150,000.
And while fans, at the moment, might swear they'll never play a non-Kojima version of those games, history has shown that brand loyalty often overpowers developer loyalty.
«Drunk History,» created by Derek Waters and Jeremy Konner, is Comedy Central's liquored - up version of our nation's hHistory,» created by Derek Waters and Jeremy Konner, is Comedy Central's liquored - up version of our nation's historyhistory.
Last year the Washington State Legislature approved a massive $ 8.7 billion subsidy package — the largest in U.S. history — to win a Boeing assembly plant for the extended - range version of its 777 aircraft.
Tesla released arguably one of the biggest over-the-air software updates in its company history when it introduced Version 8.0 with updated Autopilot in...
If the history of this presidency is a guide, then the latest rendition will last only a few news cycles before it too is clarified into some new version.
History has shown that the most creative people leave repressive regimes and create elsewhere By which you mean our version of History has shown this.
When a group of Bitcoin users and companies split the digital currency into two different versions in August, it was an unprecedented event in the technology's nine - year history.
College: An earlier version of this article misstated the access employers have to an individual's credit history.
In Hegel himself and in Kojeve sometimes — and, of course, in Fukuyama's lullaby version of Kojeve — the philosophical observation that history has....
Put a burden on their backs they could not carry, then beat them when they fell under the load Read your history, Gilbert... the church has historically justified all manner of evil against the Jews because of their «failure» to accept this new version of G - d's «mercy», which requires them to believe that G - d wasn't serious when he told them their covenant was «for ALL generations».
«Tribalism,» as he defines it, is «the commitment of individuals and groups to their own history, culture, and identity, and this commitment (though not any particular version of it) is a permanent feature of human social life.»
I thank my correspondents for their kind words and for their interest in a turbulent period in our national history, the effects of which are self - evidently clear every time Senator Barrack Obama» quintessential candidate of the Authorized Version of the Sixties» speaks.
There are 2 versions of LDS history.
Like another well - intentioned volume of church history, The Christian World (1982), this is the National Geographic version of church history, or, to follow the culinary metaphor, the Gourmet magazine edition of it.
We believe fundamentally different versions of history (apparently).
Hold up everyone — we have a new version of history froma reliable source — let's listen up!
I personally believe that Jesus Christ is the true power behind AA, go back a little in the history of AA and see how it was founded, not the watered down version that is AA today.
The History Channel is just the motion picture version of History for Dummies.
Questions also are raised about the identity of the church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account of history, about whether there is a doctrine of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring of Protestantism, about the role of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge of modern scientific and technological developments, about how other faith traditions are related to this version of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
It is interesting to compare Ogden's treatment with that of Metz in «Redemption and emancipation», first published in English in Cross Currents and included, in an adapted version, as Chapter 7 in Faith in History and
It is far easier to folow the history and see why your book, your god, and the NT needed to be created, BY MEN... no evidence of divine inspiration... a line showing the previous cultures your story was taken from, and one can see where the wisdom of men was incorporated... just in your version it is not mans wisdom, but something from some deity (who until the NT was a very vindictive, murderous, egotistical god), who suddenly is all love and flowers.
This whole thing of everyone making interpretations of what any of it means is plain ignorant... Keep in mind there are 8 known versions of the bible throughout history and lets not get into translation «liberties» that were taken so that it could fill someones agenda..
The standard version of church history, focused on Western Europe and the United States, doesn't seem appropriate for a world in which soon two - thirds of Christians will live in the Southern Hemisphere.
Otherwise, you're practicing history's version of the religion and not the religious tenets itself.
The Whig narrative is the popular version of Whig history.
Impelled by a need to find the roots of their form of Mormonism, leading historians of the Reorganization have embarked on an exercise in higher criticism, subjecting to close scrutiny Joseph Smith's story and Mormon scripture as well as the two official versions of church history.
Just merely reading history doesn't settle anything because there are differnt versions of that same history and different schools of thought that develop from time to time.
History of al - Tabari indicates a number of versions of the story of al - Khidr and its connection with the Qur» an 18:61 - 83.53 Contrary to Ibn Ishaq, al - Tabari favors the story where al - Khidr is believed to be in existence from before Moses.
The bible is one of the many ways satan uses to mislead people... seriously look at the history of the world since the bible was written... Belief in the bible has led to wars, faster spread of disease, attempted genocide, and the chaos of trying to interpret it, 40, 000 versions of belief in the bible... definitely sounds like something satan would want... a source of unfounded belief leading to conflict, and silly people trying to perform «exorcisms»
And that is the point of my argument; the standard theological version of process philosophy — Whitehead with God — leads me to ask such questions, leads me to wonder why such senseless, absurd disasters have plagued us at every step of our history, and this counts strongly against the centered version of process metaphysics.
Such a history of «subjective aim» is possible only because of a compositional idiosyncrasy of Whitehead's: although he revised his position many times, he tried very hard to preserve the texts of earlier positions in the final version, often by insertions designed to persuade the reader to interpret such texts in the light of later positions.
Our children are taught less and less actual history because too many special interest groups (like some Christians) want their version of history taught.
This fact just does not fit with the biblical version of earths history or the account of Adam which means there was no «first man» and no inherrited sin and thus no need for a savior or a ransom sacrafice.
In short, faith development strikes me as an existentialist version of redemptive history in which history is reduced to personal response while holding fast to a chronological framework.
So it has become a new scholarly task to supplement the standard version of church history, based on Paul and Acts, with the church history that leads from Jesus via the Sayings Gospel to Matthew, that is to say, from Galilee directly to Antioch without the detour via the Damascus road.
because its from 1611 so it should have passages about crusades and the such, so this version of the book of hate should be burned so that history can be erased.
Through an emancipatory retelling of the story of Ellaiyamman their particular version of history is inscribed and validated.
The human mind that abstracts from the realism and intuition of St. John, to theologise its own version of the Jesus of History as distinct from the Jesus of Faith, must always end up with a supreme Prophet who is less than the transcendent divine, who is not pre-existent to the Universe and Creation, and who at the very highest is «divine» only as a supreme emanation of a «holy and noble consciousness» at the root of being itself, and identified with Creation itself.
Should we embrace those too to satisfy your version of history and what it means?
More than one historian has commented on how in this respect the Christian movement was responsible for producing for the first time a truly global, ecumenical version of world history, with the meaning and significance of history to be found where the spirit moves and blows, typically among those considered outcasts, the lowly, the oppressed or socially insignificant.
The biblical answer to the problem of evil in human history is a radical answer, precisely because human evil is recognized as a much more stubborn fact than is realized in some modern versions of the Christian faith.
These versions do not take the problem of justice in history seriously, because they have obscured what the Bible has to say about the relation of justice to mercy in the very heart of God.
We have seen this to be largely the case with the Lucan version of the resurrection of Jesus which became the standard tradition through most of Christian history.
Two sharply conflicting versions of the Christian faith about man's life in history are competing for the mind of Protestantism today.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z