Sentences with phrase «versions of the question does»

We tend to hear two different versions of the question does apartment insurance cover the landlord?

Not exact matches

So the question becomes: In your search for groundbreaking ideas, how do you tap into your own version of Janusian thinking?

While there were few bombshell revelations, Zuckerberg did answer a far - reaching and diverse set of questions ranging from whether Facebook is a monopoly to whether the company would ever consider an ad - free paid version.

So many questions so far have been answered by Zuckerberg with some version of «We already do that.»

When Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies this week before Congress, it'll offer up a version of Zuckerberg we don't normally get to see: A version where he's on - camera, unscripted and answering tough questions.

His version of youth doesn't deal with any serious questions regarding who one ought to be in terms of what is the best way of life.

The convenient and expedient thing to do in your situation (where your version of Christianity is called into question) is to cherry - pick those bible verses that suit your need.

Therefore, one version of this problem concerns the question as to what God does over and above what is accomplished by these lesser temporal processes.

There, Matthew's version of the question raised at Caesarea Philippi about Jesus» identity begins with Jesus asking «Who do people say that the Son of Man is?»

The text which we present is an abbreviated version of our discussion with Dr. Hartshorne, and it does not reflect the exact, original order of our questions and Hartshorne's answers.

I loved your question about a good chicken paprikash recipe; I do make my own version of that dish, and have always thought that I'd eventually share that one, too.

It's crazy, the things you'll do when you find yourself trapped in the middle of a Boeing 777 — with your husband sitting next to you, hogging the armrest and playing what seems like a never - ending game of solitaire — questioning how many typos were in the scheduled version of that boozy, celebratory blog post and if it was even scheduled for the right day.

I make a lot of foods that are based off of these products (especially since I don't eat meat so making my own broth is out of the question) and I am really frustrated with all the ingredients in even the gluten free versions.

Arsenal have not lost either of the two games that we have played in November so far, but we could have done and our performances in those two games against Ludogorets Razgrad and Tottenham will surely bring up the questions about whether or not this season's version of the Gunners can avoid the usual nightmare that is November.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

And that doesn't even question whether the Shazier version of the Defense was good enough in the first place, never mind the Shazierless Defense.

Our finding, In short, is that the Allison version of Arsenal's history simply doesn't ring true - which has left us with the question: how could someone so closely connected with the club get such an important story so wrong?

I don't ever question other peoples» versions of how they live their lives or what they do.

NOTE: This is somewhat related (a «soft» version of) to this question (Do / did non-dictatorial Communist societies exist?)

It's sort of an evolutionary version of Freud's classic question, «What do women want?»

In the document he has circulated he questions why Poythress and Petrila did not seek his version of events before writing their commentary and why Hart did not offer Hare a chance to respond in the same issue of IJFMH.

For us, the question in this study was, do exhausted cells represent a distinct type of T cell or are they merely a «groggy» version of functional T cells?»

To settle the question, Weinberger needs to show that a latent version of the virus is fitter than a version lacking that capacity, something his team is now working hard to do.

The original tweet has been retweeted an impressive 3,500 times, with 12,000 likes and over 200 replies, almost all of which ask a version of the same question: How'd she do it?

I've also gotten some questions about pre-made sunscreen options for those who don't have the time or desire to make a homemade version of their own.

If you had a PDF version of everything contained here I would definitely buy it:) Quick question on broth — do you ever refrigerate the bone broth and skim off the (solidified) fat for tallow?

The freemium version, on the other hand, has no profile pictures and doesn't let you message potential matches, but you can choose up to five pre-set questions to send to a match, who can then choose their response from a list of answers.

I didn't initially have the answer to that Toronto question about a combined version of the film, because I'd never tried it.

To say that Beresford's version of «Bonnie & Clyde» doesn't adequately answer these questions would be an understatement.

As for why Gearbox can't do it themselves, the answer is simple: They're just far too busy with the console versions of the game in question.

Waititi doesn't seem to give a damn about answering questions from previous movies or setting up the next big thing — Avengers: Infinity War (May) will follow Black Panther (February)-- and that's the beginning of the end for this version of the MCU.

Aside from some extra deleted scenes, there's an entire version of the film that is filled with «fact or fiction» pop - ups... answering and asking the question «what is real and what did you guys make - up?»

The Question spaces kinda ruined the boards for me like Space Land for having too many around and moving you further away from the star & Mystery Land is a worse version of Wario's Battle Canyon because Question blocks do not make a board good!

The deleted / extended bits are as follows: Andy Samberg (4:12) on Bob Dylan, Aziz Ansari (1:42) on acting and Twitter, alternate Reggie banter (0:39), Medi - Ship complications (1:06), Fabrice Fabrice (4:21) performing a poem on a lost city, Anna Kendrick (1:47) recalling her Tony nomination as a 12 - year - old and eating a cat's liver, Rodney Waber (5:34) dishes more Harrison Ford gossip, dances, and reveals a senior citizen ticket price trick, David Cross (2:49) talks talking animals and white toilets, Senator Dewhurst (3:14) confesses strange sex dreams about his aunt and his plan to drive drunk, Zoe Saldana (2:03) answers questions about movies and acts out a Jerry Maguire reboot, «Garry Marshall» (1:19) explains why he's done with movies, Gillian Jacobs (1:38) discusses the ghost of Christopher Marlowe and the conflict in Nebraska, Chef Emeril Lugosi (0:34) endures a pun about sun - dried tomatoes, Andy Richter (4:59) delivers a kid - friendly version of «The Aristocrats» joke, pulls a gun after not answering a fart question (a task handled by Andy Samberg on the show itself), and responds to the 1990s TV movie The Shining, Tom Perdy (0:44) shows off a couple of additional cartoons.

Toni Erdmann features a killer karaoke version of «Greatest Love of All,» but it's also about one of the most important questions the movies can ask: How do we stay young?

That question is somewhat complicated, because there are very good things about it — Chloë Grace Moretz's fantastic as a foulmouthed twelve - year - old version of the Punisher, with some Jackie Chan thrown in, and so is «lead» Aaron Johnson, who manages not to look like he's lost the movie he's top - lining to every single other cast member, whether it's Moretz, Nic Cage, Christopher Mintz - Plasse (whose squinty nerd thing, identical to Superbad, is just annoying here) or Mark Strong, even though he does at one point or another in the film.

A better question is, «why does any version of this game have multi-player?»

The questions above are only appropriate for those versions of the story where it is not specifically stated that the boy did not see the wolf.

This resource includes: An editable version of the cards with questions and a blank sheet ready to be filled in with your own questions A non-editable version ready to be printed and used in class The rules in French for your students to play the game and extra ideas on how to use those cards Please check my other resources on No et Moi in my shop: https://www.tes.com/teaching-resources/shop/MllePierre I hope you will enjoy my resources and if you have a question on the game please do not hesitate to contact me or leave me a message.

This version of the fairy tale opens another line of questioning: «Since the giant had stolen everything from Jack's father, do you think it was OK for Jack to take it back?»

In January, the school council at Boothroyd Primary Academy also hosted its own version of «Question Time» by interviewing MP Paula Sherriff on how her role supports the people of Dewsbury, and by asking what more could be done to save the local and wider environment as well as endangered animals.

You don't have to change the questions on the alternate versions, just the order of the questions.

FOR GOOGLE CLASSROOM Included in this resource: • Title page • Do Now / Motivation student - centered question • The Algonquian reading passage with graphic organizer • Application / Closing / Higher Order Thinking Question • Answer Key for Graphic Organizer Students will research how the Algonquian lived: location, tribes, homes, adaptation based on environment, role of women Adheres to Social Studies Common Core Standards - research, application, literacy, vocabulary; lifting evidence from text Differentiation: graphic organizer; cooperative (students may work in groups / teams / partner to complete graphic organizer based on teacher's discretion) ★ ★ Looking for the pen and paper, hard - copy version of this rquestion • The Algonquian reading passage with graphic organizer • Application / Closing / Higher Order Thinking Question • Answer Key for Graphic Organizer Students will research how the Algonquian lived: location, tribes, homes, adaptation based on environment, role of women Adheres to Social Studies Common Core Standards - research, application, literacy, vocabulary; lifting evidence from text Differentiation: graphic organizer; cooperative (students may work in groups / teams / partner to complete graphic organizer based on teacher's discretion) ★ ★ Looking for the pen and paper, hard - copy version of this rQuestion • Answer Key for Graphic Organizer Students will research how the Algonquian lived: location, tribes, homes, adaptation based on environment, role of women Adheres to Social Studies Common Core Standards - research, application, literacy, vocabulary; lifting evidence from text Differentiation: graphic organizer; cooperative (students may work in groups / teams / partner to complete graphic organizer based on teacher's discretion) ★ ★ Looking for the pen and paper, hard - copy version of this resource?

On question 1, the wording did appear to influence responses, so we present the results of both versions.

Our previous version of this exercise did not include the individual «thinking time» and had fewer and more simplistic questions.

The students not only asked Mr. Newdow to describe the case, but they also asked him the following question: «aside from your belief that recitations of the current version of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools in the United States should be declared unconstitutional because of its inclusion of the phrase «under God,» do you also believe that the phrase «in God we trust» should be removed from our paper currency?»

Then they try to do it faster using a different set, which has the same questions, but a different sort order My favourite use of loop cards is for two students to have different versions of the cards and race each other.

This post sheds some initial light on that question by asking two questions: 1) For the states that call themselves «Common Core» states (or did before that term became politically unfavorable), how similar are their state - specific versions of the CCSS to the CCSS as originally written?

The open question is whether Buick has put enough distance between its first Avenir model and the regular trims to get buyers to line up for it as they do for the profitable Denali versions of GMC trucks and SUVs.

I can already hear the question forming in gearhead brains, but no, that does not mean the return of a manual transmission; like the outgoing version, the latest is all continuously variable (CVT) automatic, all the time.