Sentences with phrase «versus higher child»

Not exact matches

Reading the comment carefully, you understand that the father (and child) feel less shame about taking advantage of school meals at breakfast, where the service is universal (available to all regardless of economic need) versus at lunch, where there is often a more visible distinction between paying and nonpaying students, or between students on the federally reimbursable lunch line versus those who can purchase for - cash (and often more desirable) «a la carte» food, or (in the case of high schoolers) between students who can go off campus to buy lunch at convenience stores and restaurants versus those with no money in their pockets.

Only 6 percent of college - educated single women had children from 2006 - 2008, according to the National Marriage Project, a pro-marriage think tank housed at the University of Virginia, versus 54 percent of women who didn't graduate from high school and 44 percent of those with high school diplomas.

«Additionally, these results can give confidence to parents and health educators that choosing between a high back versus a backless booster seat for their child does not represent a compromise in safety.»

This is suggested by the association between the composite score of autonomy support and child executive function, as well as by the fact that the clearest group differences emerged between children experiencing consistently high versus consistently low degrees of autonomy support over time.

The study also found that factors including family background, health, home learning, parenting and early care and education explained over half the gaps in reading and math ability between children in the lowest versus highest socioeconomic strata.

Compared with similar children without early preventive dental care, children receiving early preventive dental care from a dentist had more frequent tooth decay - related treatment (20.6 percent versus 11.3 percent), a higher rate of visits and higher annual dental expenditures ($ 168 versus $ 87).

Stress: A 2004 study comparing the telomeres of a group of age - matched mothers with healthy children versus mothers who cared for children with a chronic illness (high chronic stress group) showed shorter, unhealthier telomeres in the mothers caring for the sick children.

Are comparisons between the United States and other countries truly equitable / comapable when the U.S. has a pluralistic approach to teaching all children versus other countries in which students are deliberately grouped, tracked, and segregated into different ability classifications and restricted in their access to higher levels of education?

So let me invite proponents of differentiated instruction to supply evidence that this strategy is effective, particularly for educating children of high ability, versus approaches that entail separation, augmentation, or acceleration.

But at 100 percent, our child poverty rate was almost three times as high as Finland's (12.4 percent versus 4.6 percent).

I used the appendix provided by Weiland to compute the percentile test score gains for children eligible for a subsidized lunch, versus higher - income children who were ineligible for a subsidized lunch.

LaFonda Willis, former administrator for D.C. Public Schools and education chair for the NAACP D.C. chapter, agreed that the conversation shouldn't have been centered around traditional versus charter but rather how can district and charter schools collaborate «to ensure Black children have access to high - quality education and that we're helping them to achieve achieve self - sufficiency and reach their full potential.»

WHEREAS the unintended consequence of such action has led to teachers teaching children to score high on a test versus teaching real mastery of subject matter; and

Families that want to see their children get into higher education should also be cautious when taking out loans like the Parent PLUS Loan and private student loans, as consideration has to be put toward what's paid off in the future versus what's lent.

In addition, The rate of children with scores in the clinical range for withdrawn behavior (31.6 % versus 0.0 %, p = 0.00), thought problems (52.6 % versus 16.7 %, p = 0.01), delinquent behavior (31.6 % versus 6.7 %, p = 0.00), internalizing problems (73.7 % versus 33.3 %, p = 0.01), externalizing problems (47.4 % versus 16.7 %, p = 0.03), and total problems (57.9 % versus 13.3 %, p = 0.00) were significantly higher among the children who were visiting their fathers than those were not visiting them (Table 4).

The average scores for the following subscales of the CBCL among the children who visited their fathers were significantly higher than those who did not visit their fathers: withdrawn behavior (4.8 versus 1.5, p = 0.00); somatic complaints (4.1 versus 1.5, p = 0.03); anxious / depressed behavior (8.4 versus 3.8, p = 0.02), thought problems (2.1 versus 0.77, p = 0.02); attention problems (6.5 versus 3.4, p = 0.00); other problems (7.9 versus 4.9, p = 0.05); internalizing problems (17.4 versus 6.8, p = 0.00); and total problems (37.6 versus 19.1, p = 0.00).

Furthermore, children with high classmate support had lower levels of depression under conditions of low versus high daily hassles.

All analyses were stratified by gender and cohort («younger cohort» refers to those transitioning from junior high / middle school to high school and «older cohort» refers to those transitioning from high school to young adulthood) to assess the differential impact of mothers and fathers on children of the same or opposite sex, and potential differences in the relationship between parental influence and behavioral outcomes for the younger versus older cohort.

Family background, health, home learning, parenting, and early care and education factors explain over half the gaps in reading and math ability between US children in the lowest versus highest socioeconomic status quintiles, suggesting a need for comprehensive early interventions.

Structured parenting of toddlers at high versus low genetic risk: Two pathways to child problems.

Such an approach is suggested by the finding of non-equivalent outcomes among children of parents with high versus low levels of subthreshold depression in TAU.

Openness / problems in communication did not differ across groups at T1, but problems with fathers were higher among children with non-advanced cancer versus comparisons at T2.

The development of emotional regulation capacities in children at high versus low risk for externalizing disorder was examined in a longitudinal study investigating: (a) whether disturbances in emotion regulation precede and predict the emergence of externalizing symptoms and (b) whether sensitive maternal behavior is a significant influence on the development of child emotion regulation.

From a socio - cultural viewpoint, cognitively responsive behaviours (e.g. maintaining versus redirecting interests, rich verbal input) are thought to facilitate higher levels of learning because they provide a structure or scaffold for the young child's immature skills, such as developing attentional and cognitive capacities.9 Responsive behaviours in this framework promote joint engagement and reciprocity in the parent - child interaction and help a child learn to assume a more active and ultimately independent role in the learning process.10 Responsive support for the child to become actively engaged in solving problems is often referred to as parental scaffolding, and is also thought to be key for facilitating children's development of self - regulation and executive function skills, behaviours that allow the child to ultimately assume responsibility for their well - being.11, 12

Variations in the type, severity, chronicity and timing of maternal depression [9], heterogeneity in sampling (community versus high - risk multiproblem samples), and potentiating risk factors, such as family adversity, low social support and financial stress [10], all contribute to differences in outcomes in children.

To be specific, profiles based on these variables were analyzed in children with high levels of proactive versus reactive aggression.