I started with a limit order on a debit
vertical call spread, but decided to switch it to a...
Not exact matches
The so -
called vertical spread uses income from selling the higher - strike contract to reduce the cost of the
calls closer to the money.
Jeff, Hello from one Nerd to another Geek... stumbled upon your video on Bear
Spread call (Vertical) and Bull Put
spreads (
Verticals) on you - tube..
Bear
call spread and bear put
spread are bearish
vertical spreads constructed using
calls and puts respectively.
If I believe a stock will go up, say from a price of $ 100, and I wish to execute an options strategy that would make me money if the stock were to rise, why would I want to setup a
vertical spread when I could instead purchase a single naked
call?
Question: are you saying that buying a
call is better than buying a
vertical spread regardless of fees, or only because of fees?
If the former, you are saying that buying a
call and selling a
vertical spread will always be profitable, which effectively means you're going short an out - of - the - money
call.
While that's a good strategy, it doesn't guarantee profit, and will lose money exactly when the
vertical spread is a better strategy than buying the
call outright.
The most direct answer to your question in comments: if the stock goes down, you lose less money with the
vertical spread than you do with a simple
call.
It seems to me that my transaction costs would be 2x with the
spread, and while I see that time decay (Theta) is mitigated with a
vertical spread, wouldn't the unbridled upside to unlimited theoretical profit of the naked
call be better in the long run if this strategy is executed multiple times?