Sentences with phrase «very bad outcomes»

Certainly it can lead to very bad outcomes (the prisons are full of people with undiagnosed and / or untreated ADHD), but it can also lead to huge success, joy and fulfillment in life.

I suspect your friend is in for a lot more very bad outcomes in life if he thinks this is how contracts, and life in general, works.

Wagner and Weitzman helpfully translate the scientific research on climate sensitivities into probabilities of very bad outcomes, and they conclude that at 700 ppm, there is an 11 percent chance of an increase in global temperature exceeding 11 degrees Fahrenheit.

And since it is well known that hungry students can't learn, this is a very bad outcome.

I know there are plenty of relators claiming to be specialist in short selling, but this could be a very bad outcome if homework and research is not done leading to foreclosure.

When these needs aren't met, frustration gets pent up until it is released, and in pits, it could come out explosively and end with a very bad outcome.

its a very, very bad outcome.

Whether the threat of resource depletion and the state of environment are on a path that leads to a very bad outcome in far future (far might be 30 years or significantly more) or not the markets are too myopic to react.

In my opinion, the UN and the «warmers» appear to have the same talents, only their con is on a a much larger (global) scale and will have not a good outcome as the movie, but will have a very bad outcome if they're left to complete their nefarious goals.

The very worst outcomes are bad indeed.

Not exact matches

The first question reminds you that on the spectrum of bad outcomes, not succeeding in a creative project is on the (very) low end of the seriousness scale.

«The best outcomes under a Brexit are worse than remaining and the worst outcomes are very bad indeed.»

We suspect that the outcomes, mostly bad, will very likely be the same no matter what we do.

After the troubles we had to defeat Crystal Palace, you would expect teams to bring similar mentality against Arsenal and the outcome could be worse than what we had on the first match, an extra man in the centre where we looked jaded could be very effective.

He has the worst record of any manager in the UCL and we are never taken very seriously; so why did you think that we would do better than the Monaco outcome last year with no better players?

Whether the outcome of this is good or bad, none can tell until the very final moment, if that is a possibility?

There may be a few more bad outcomes in the homebirth groups depending on how you look at the data, but when you consider the number of births we are looking at, the absolute number is so very few that the argument is a little ridiculous.»

Motor vehicles crashes are a very common bad outcome from drinking, but there are many more bad outcomes that can result, including sexual risk - taking and assault, falls and other injuries, physical violence, property damage, and overdose, to name a few.

A very supportive cousin of mine told me to try not to stress and to be okay with the worst possible outcome, to remain hopeful about trying again for the next feeding, to try only as much as I felt comfortable with, and not to stop trying unless that is what I wanted.

It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of infant mortality, if massive, high tech, emergency, intervention, which is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies at some later date (and it will be higher risk for the rest of infancy, at least, due to prematurity).

So you put yourself and your baby at very high risk of a bad outcome, and what does it get you in return?

A very good midwife has told me she was at a MANAstats meeting for midwives where the attendees were assured that if they had a bad outcome they could leave it out of their stats.

It's very hard to speak against that or be discouraging about that but, on the other hand, there is the possibility that in nursing you actually increase the risk of a bad outcome in this respect.

In a report released earlier this year, the commons education committee also found «no convincing evidence of the impact of academy status on attainment in primary schools», adding that while «some chains such as Harris have proved very effective at raising attainment... others achieve worse outcomes than comparable mainstream schools».

They also found «no convincing evidence of the impact of academy status on attainment in primary schools», adding that while «some chains such as Harris have proved very effective at raising attainment... others achieve worse outcomes than comparable mainstream schools».

The plans for secure colleges are a leap into the unknown that have the potential to deliver worse outcomes for the very vulnerable young people who are placed into custody across the secure youth estate.

@lazarusL actually, people who play political game suffer negative outcomes too, they just usually are very bad at attributing the negative outcome to the cause, because the game is much more complex and there's a lot of vested interest in confusing the link between the cause and the effect.

Investigators of the medical consequences of the disaster must contend with both the very real effects of the tragedy and the desire to blame every bad medical outcome on Chernobyl.

«We know that being inactive for long periods of time is bad for you,» Benden said, «and this is an example of technology actually affecting the very furniture to prompt behavioral change and make good choices that over many years add up to good outcomes.»

I'm very optimistic, I prefer to view things as if they can also have a positive outcome no matter how bad things might seem.

When the action does unfold, we also have a vested interest in the outcome, as the character development makes us care about the very likeable duo, while also giving the actions of the bad guys a more nefarious edge necessary to make things truly harrowing once things get brutal.

«But students who use computers very frequently at school do a lot worse in most learning outcomes, even after accounting for social background and student demographics.»

The report found that students who use computers moderately at school tended to have better learning outcomes than students who rarely used them, but the worrying discovery was that students who use computers «very frequently» at school do much worse, even after accounting for social background and student demographics.

But students who use computers very frequently at school do a lot worse in most learning outcomes.

This is the very point we have argued against all the corporate reformers who say that poverty is not a factor, that only incompetent and inappropriately protected teachers result in bad educational outcomes.

And it seems, for whatever reason, very hard to get the public to understand that charter schools are not a single entity with one kind of culture or philosophy; they vary and, as with everything else in existence, produce both good and bad outcomes.

And yet, good and bad standards and all of those in between, along with all of the implementation tools currently known to policymakers, have produced outcomes that indicate one thing: Standards do not matter very much.»

When schools try to do experiential learning and active learning with students whose command of reading, writing, mathematics, science and technology is very shaky, the outcomes may be worse than if these pedagogical approaches were not tried at all, because, all too often, the result is shallow learning.

Despite the painfully bad educational outcomes in many public schools in ghettos across the country, there are also cases where charter schools in the very same ghettos turn out students whose test scores are not only far higher than those in other ghetto schools, but sometimes are comparable to the test scores in schools in upscale suburban communities, where children come from intact families with highly educated parents.

Aiming to avoid the worst case outcome from their perspective — in my example, finding no one willing to buy the 100 shares of the Select Dividend ETF the market maker bought from you at the price it paid to you — market makers guessed very low, you might say, at current ETF prices.

When the chances of a bad outcome approach around 10 %, mindfulness really helps you ignore those unlikely bad outcomes and proceed with a strategy that has a very good chance of success.

Fortunately, advances in techniques for fracture repair make successful outcomes possible for most pets with fractures, even those with very bad fractures.

The outcome is variable but has potential to be very bad.

Even assuming we are assigning probabilities correctly (very dubious in itself), the usual use of probabilities of outcomes in things like cost - benefit analysis assumes an aggregation of harms across many, many similar decisions, in some of which cases things turn out very badly, but in others of which things come out not so badly.

Thinking in terms of an unwelcome message, a partially understood problem where very out bad outcomes can not be ruled out, and universally flawed solutions seems to me a grown - up way of engaging the electorate.

And the only way to do that is with technical fixes that can be applied as quickly as possible — evolutionary changes in the way that human beings relate to the rest of the Earth's biosphere can not possibly have any impact in the very short time frame that is required to prevent the worst outcomes of global warming.

Thus in answer to your question of what ceiling would avoid «the worst outcomes» I'd suggest that given the application of Geo - E in 2025 by the collective decision of UN member states, after a decade of RD&D stringently supervised by a mandated UN scientific agency, we'd have a very good chance of peaking SAT warming at around 1.25 C, and bring it to zero before 2030.

To be very clear, current bad climate outcomes are occurring under just 1 C above 1880s level warming.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

I submit that nothing is a very bad choice given the likely outcomes even if there is no casual link.