A showcase collection of nearly 200 outstanding sample resumes and 12 cover letters representing
the very best creations of professional resume writes.
With these practices, we can begin to embrace the gift of God's
very good creation — our bodies and the Earth.
I must say these pancakes turned out to be
my very best creation.
Not exact matches
Also, notwithstanding a silly fiscal policy and the ongoing political impasse, the U.S. economy has some
very good things going for it now, as even king of doom, Nouriel Roubini, couldn't help but note: the Fed is going to stick to its asset - buying regime for the foreseeable future, providing a monetary protein shake the recovery still
very much needs; the housing rebound is
well on its way, which is helping Americans rebuild their wealth and is boosting employment in many states with high jobless rates; and the shale oil and gas revolution continues to power investment, job
creation and revenue growth.
Join Bourbon enthusiasts from all over the world, along with master distillers and brand ambassadors, to enjoy Bluegrass - inspired culinary
creations, live music and entertainment — including a headline performance by Sundy
Best on Saturday, September 16 — and, of course, the very best of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, Kentu
Best on Saturday, September 16 — and, of course, the
very best of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, Kentu
best of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, Kentucky.
The government's job
creation record since the recessionis is not
very good, no matter how hard they try to spin it.
Another reason for the outperformance could
very well be that over a longer time frame, giving
good management teams the ability to run a business without concerns over meeting short - term expectations may lead to long - term shareholder value
creation.
As far as I can ascertain, it would not have been in the first six days, for at the end of the
creation week, God proclaimed that all of
creation was
very good.
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the
Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one t
Creation Research people.They have in fact proven
creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one t
creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a
very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.
God is not wrong and
creation is
very good.
The Biblical accounts of God - to - human relationship and affairs going from the
very obvious to the
very mysterious, starting with
creation and going through a multitude of stages, the fall, the expulsion and curse, trials and covenants, rebellion and Law, culminating with God's «Ultimate Provision» for Salvation, the «
Good News» of the Lord Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, the «New Covenant,» the «Millennial Kingdom» to come, the end of time, and the afterlife, are the basis for the Christian Theology on «Time Dispensations.»
The evil they accomplished soon became so great, it threatened the
very existence of God's
good creation.
Similarly, Kekes (a nonbeliever) claims, religious theories that posit the goodness of
creation run aground: The «
very existence of evil... constitutes a reason against believing in a morally
good order.»
Their characterization of the world as God's
creation is marked by the reiterated verdict, «It is
good, it is
good, it is
good, it is
very good.»
This «one magnificent sweep of
creation», to use Holloway's words, re-founds and renews the Church's theology of
creation as
well as filling out our insight into the
very identity of Jesus Christ.
Once we establish the idea that Eden was perfect, rather than it being
Good and at
best,
Very Good, we begin a frantic journey of a restoration of perfection and salvation is finding a way to forgive fallen broken
creation for its lapse from perfection so we can be loved by «God» again.
apparently you don't take the Word (logos)
very seriously, however your definitely on the right course in Daniel and
creation mathematics might give you a
better clue here the 70 weeks are matched to the ministry, death and martyr of steven to start the church age 7 year long week.
The
creation is
good, it is
very good, but it is not divine.
So we have first the
creation, which was
very good and lasted for 7 days.
Well shoot... I guess we
better get busy telling all the
creation believing scientists that they can go home.They're employer's are going to be
very disappointed.
You can not be a
good Physicist and be a Creationist becasue then you would be denying the
very physics that explains the
creation of stars and the conclusion that it is a process that takes millions of years.
Hence, if we situate the call of Abraham, as
well as other special revelatory moments of the history of religion, within the wider context of cosmic evolution, this may help soften the «scandal of particularity» associated with any unique or distinctive summoning by God of a particular people to bear witness in a novel way to the divine promise and mystery that come to expression first in the
very creation of the world.
God created his world to be «
very good,» but we corrupted his
creation by attempting to be our own gods and goddesses and by trying to shape...
And we have already emphasized again and again that what God is «up to» in the
creation, as
well as in human life, is the bringing to actual realization of the potentialities which are given to both in the
very fact of their being created.
Creation is
good: «God saw all that he (Sic) had made, and it was
very good» Gen. 1:31.
a
very thin skinned religious person who basically focuses all of his energy on worshiping on himself... What do you call it when the President disregards the definition of radical islamic muslims... wolf in sheep clothing... The bigger issue at hand is the economy, job
creation, national debt, and maintaining a
good middle class... all of which over the last 4 years has been failing..
Even if you believe in
creation, let the light of «It is
very good!»
Before a «
very good»
creation, there was a formless emptiness.
The finished work is reviewed by Moses and the conclusion of the matter is set in language strongly reminiscent of the account of
Creation, where «God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was
very good» (Gen. 1:31).
Here's a quote from William Stringfellow's book, An Ethic for Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land: ``... the basic conflict among all principalities remains, though it be subdued or concealed for awhile, because the only morality governing each principality is its own survival as over against
very other principality, as
well as over against human beings and, indeed, the rest of
Creation.
Now Eve, being more easily deceived because she was a woman (even though everything in
creation was «
very good»), was tricked by the Serpent (Satan embodied) into eating from this tree because the Serpent told her that if she ate from it she would be like God.
This canopy of water kept the bad rays from the sun (even though all
creation was «
very good») from attacking man's sensitive skin and causing them to age faster.
Here's an example, linked to the connection between
creation and forgiveness: the claim of the Bible is that God created a world that is
very good.
Our Godly father of all things created is awesomely grand and He may
well have had too many first born sons when in the
very beginnings of Creationism, God had to do away with many of them in order for their survival of the most fittest sons to begin building all these celestial
creations we know of as suns, and stars and moons and planets,,,
These two are meant to be
good for each other, the
very crown of the goodness of
creation, for they are the animal that has logos, capable of speaking and hearing, and therefore of teaching and learning the word of God.
They describe the archbishop as «a brilliant scholar who had
very good reasons for his conclusions concerning the date of
creation.»
That God transcends
creation — He is a thing apart; He wanted His
creation and made it a gradual process, and He made it
good; we're made in His image and likeness and we're
very good; on the seventh day, God rests and
creation basks in His delight.
It is not at all inappropriate to see God's hesed as underlying the
very act of initial as
well as continuing
creation.
I especially love the moment in the second
creation account that matches the culmination of the first
creation account, when God sees everything he has made and «behold, it was
very good» (Gen. 1:31).
So just as the «not
good» in Genesis 2 matches the silence about the goodness of
creation on day two in Genesis 1, I think we should be looking for the moment in Genesis 2 that matches that culminating «
very good» in Genesis 1.
Surely he would have known that it would have been
better for those humans to never have been born (in fact, the Bible says this
very thing), and surely this all - compassionate deity would have foregone the
creation of a universe destined to imperfection in which many of the humans were doomed to eternal suffering.
Reading the first
creation account in light of the second, we see that the
creation is not called «
very good» until we have the human male and female.
These are all expressions of what God created that was
very good and after
creation rested.
But in that quick moment in the pine trees, I knew deeply that
creation was
very good.
Of all the «goods» stated by God throughout his process of
creation, none equaled the «
very good»
creation of man together with woman.
We say that Christ is «the key, the centre and the purpose of the whole of human history» (Vatican II, Gaudium et Spes, n. 10), as
well as unlocking the
very meaning of all
creation.
And as part of that offering, we would share in his love and compassion and concern for each other in that communion which is the Church, and in God's love for all that he made, especially for humanity - which, at the dawn of
creation, God saw as
very good.
Even more importantly, when we work for
creation's
well - being, we also work for the health, dignity and wellbeing of the 70 percent of the world's poorest people who depend on it for their
very survival.
The view of humankind is high — humans are the crown of a
creation that God calls
good every step along the way and, finally,
very good.
God created his world to be «
very good,» but we corrupted his
creation by attempting to be our own gods and goddesses and by trying to shape our own futures apart from him.