Sentences with phrase «very biased claims»

Bettina, this is such a great, clear and cogent explanation of the many very biased claims this piece makes, which are not supported by facts, just anecdotes and wishful thinking.

Not exact matches

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

Colin's claims may seem biased to you, but when it comes to the truth of religion or the existence of any god, he is very able to back up his claims with fact.

It also reiterates Paladino's claim that Dicker is somehow working on behalf of Andrew Cuomo, or, at the very least, biased in favor of his candidacy.

Kane's research was, of course, used to support the claim that bad teachers are causing the disparities that he cited, regardless of the fact the inverse could be also, equally, or even more true — that the value - added measures used to measure teacher effectiveness in these schools are biased by the very nature of the students in these schools that are contributing their low test scores to such estimates.

The very first response on a popular news aggregation site pointed an accusing finger directly at us, claiming all sorts, such as bias of click - bait.

All in all it is a very biased site that only claims to seek truth.

There have been 9 sets of studies which claim to have proved that urbanization bias is a negligible (or very minor) problem:

There was plenty of very favourable discussion of the papers which claimed that urbanization bias was negligible.

That suggests the bias from estimating TCR from 1930 — 50 to 1995 — 2015 using HadCRUT4v4 data is very minor, and that observation based estimates of TCR of ~ 1.33 °C need to be revised up by, at most, a small fraction of the 24 % claimed in REA16.

Few papers claim to confirm independently the evolution of temperatures in the twentieth century, to my knowledge, there could have been: — Gergis 2012 (the paper is withdrawn due to a significant error discovered on ClimateAudit), — Marcott 2013 (very poor resolution and various tricks), — Tingley and Huybers 2013 (temperature of stations dominate the reconstruction in the twentieth century), — Briffa 2013 (selection bias and lack of standardization).