Sentences with phrase «very big space»

That is a sort of measure of its «legginess», or the result of its «legginess», that you have this very big space under it that you don't have in «Greedy Granadilla» and I think there is a problem with that space.

Not exact matches

And some of the players to watch out for are the same big guys from 10 or 20 years ago (Microsoft, Oracle, AT&T, etc.) who are the long - entrenched stakeholders and «powers - who - be» in your space — not because they're great innovators or disruptors, but because: (a) they're increasingly well - informed about who's doing what very well (damn those demo days); (b) they're fairly fast followers with great gobs of money; and (c) they have the people, resources, and patience to hang around and keep buying and trying until they eventually get things right in the long run.
Analyst Bryan Kraft said that its leadership in the space had made it «very difficult for the traditional media companies, or even other big tech companies, to catch up.»
«Through trial and error, we developed a very good way to ship a very big piece of glass that also wouldn't take up too much space in the truck,» he says.
«I find it very difficult to imagine how Amazon will enter the space without making big acquisitions.»
Especially in the bigger coworking spaces where not all members know each other very well, it's a great way to get your expertise and services in front of the community.
She carried a very complex narrative that addresses common humanity and big ideas about how and why we communicate, while also exploring space travel and even an apocalyptic world in some ways.
In explaining the scientific theory that the universe originated in a big bang, Paul Davies remarked: «The conditions at the big bang imply an infinite distortion of time, so that the very concept of time (and space) can not be extended back beyond the big bang» (24).
Of course our language does not capture the theoretical physical ideas very well, but it allows for something like «sheets» of «energy» rippling and contacting each other between higher dimensions of reality that we are blind to from our perspective in this ongoing «big bang» of energy / time / space.
The big chain supermarkets in central London are very small so usually do not have the space -LSB-...]
The big chain supermarkets in central London are very small so usually do not have the space for a «free from» aisle», so Whole Foods Market is your saviour!
Hi Bintu, strangely my other half is similar not a big dessert man but he loves this and eats the lot in a very short space of time!
... but between your lines: ``... Click on the ▶︎ play button below and you can watch my very hands make the batter, and cook the pancakes...» and ``... Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: > 15 minutes Yield: 10 to 12 pancakes...», there's a BIG BLANK SPACE with the same back - ground - color there??
Another advantage of the one - way mirror is that it makes the very small space feel a little bigger.
The only reason I can attach to this arrogance is that once not so very long ago we shared top - dog status with another big club and managed to cobble together 3 PL titles and some FA cups in a short space of time.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
«He's a very quick player but his biggest strength is not being quick, it's his decision - making in small spaces,» the German told the Liverpool Echo.
Many deals take over a year to complete, very rarely does a big player move in the space of days or weeks.
I'm of the opinion that Juventus need to be almost flawlessly clinical against Real in the final, and that certainly wasn't the case on Tuesday night: Gonzalo Higuain missed a golden opportunity in the first half, and then completely flubbed a volley attempt in the second half; right before the Dani Alves goal, Paulo Dybala had a chance to put the icing on the cake and failed; Mario Mandžukić, before he stuffed in his own rebound — which I don't want to take away from, because the window of space with which he had to work was not very big, and he tapped it home with a fair bit of dexterity — missed a golden opportunity, with credit to the keeper.
I planted everything way too close together because I was working with a very limited amount of space and totally underestimated how big everything would get.
To help them get «realistically» excited about their new neighborhood, Dr. Lori Woodring, a psychologist and author of «My Very Exciting, Sorta Scary, Big Move,» suggests gaining familiarity with the new space.
Its very easy to push, has a big space for shopping and diaper bag, easy to fold as well.
We are lucky enough to have a big space, but it's not very well organised and is generally quite messy.
This humidifier comfortably covers 200 square feet of space, making it ideal for nurseries which are usually not very big.
It does nt fold very flat either so you need to have a big space in your car boot to store this.
Because newborns have such tiny, delicate nasal passages (only about 2 to 3 millimeters, or one tenth of one inch, on each side), it takes very little change in that small space to cause big symptoms.
As numbers get bigger, primes become more rare; you might then expect the spacing between them to grow consistently larger, too, so that very large twin primes would never occur.
During a talk at Harvard, he presented a proof of the related, general conjecture that as prime numbers increase toward infinity, the spaces between them — counterintuitively — do not always do the same: No matter how big prime numbers get, you'll always find pairs of them that differ by, at the very most, 70 million.
It is very difficult to do verifiable and repeatable science under these conditions and this explains why it takes so long to make big discoveries in space.
These ripples were thought to be caused by gravitational waves, ripples in the very fabric of space - time, created a tiny fraction of a second after the big bang.
«To take the next really big leaps in lunar science is going to take landing on the ground and getting at it with instruments in a way very similar to what we've done for Mars,» says Barbara Cohen, a planetary scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who has developed methods for dating planetary samples on the surface of other worlds1.
Standard cosmology — that is, the Big Bang Theory with its early period of exponential growth known as inflation — is the prevailing scientific model for our universe, in which the entirety of space and time ballooned out from a very hot, very dense point into a homogeneous and ever - expanding vastness.
This quantum gravity theory would take over from general relativity in the extraordinarily tight quarters — the very core of a black hole, the very instant of the Big Bang — where relativity now predicts, absurdly, that space - time is infinitely curved.
Standing at the threshold, adjusting now is much easier before society embraces big business (the very control freaks putting labor and market ahead of citizens) in space.
But if you look at the very biggest picture, our place in the universe is defined by the Big Bang, an equal expansion of space in all directions.
«The abundance of organics and their role in getting life started may make a big, big difference between a giant universe with a lot of life, and one with very little,» says Scott Sandford of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, who studies organic molecules from space.
They have already been big successes in niches including very long - lasting space batteries developed by NASA and DOE.
«We have exciting days ahead with a return to deep space and a journey to Mars, and this test is a very big step in that direction.»
GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, MD — The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is NASA's top priority science mission launching in this decade and will have the capability to «look back towards the very first objects that formed after the Big Bang,» said Dr. -LSBSPACE FLIGHT CENTER, MD — The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is NASA's top priority science mission launching in this decade and will have the capability to «look back towards the very first objects that formed after the Big Bang,» said Dr. -LSBSpace Telescope (JWST) is NASA's top priority science mission launching in this decade and will have the capability to «look back towards the very first objects that formed after the Big Bang,» said Dr. -LSB-...]
«It is very striking that when we compare the size and shape of the Big Bird beaks with the beak morphologies of the other three species inhabiting Daphne Major, the Big Birds occupy their own niche in the beak morphology space,» said Sangeet Lamichhaney, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and the first author on the study.
And then private industry, Peter's idea, going back to this particular space prize, was that where NASA had a left off NASA had gotten very big.
«The chameleon field is light in empty space but as soon as it enters an object it becomes very heavy and so couples only to the outermost layer of a big object, and not to the internal parts,» Holger Muller, an assistant professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, and a faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said in a statement Thursday.
However, now that adaptive optics is beginning to give very good results, then there are some wavelength regions where things can be done from the ground probably with a much cheaper experiment than you would be able to do from space or for the same amount of money with much bigger telescopes.
«Irene did about what was expected from the forecasts,» said atmospheric scientist Eugene McCaul, of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. «The rainfall was probably the biggest threat, partly because most ofthe East and New England have had a very wet August even before Irene's onslaught.»
Space telescopes like Planck that observe the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation have mapped the light from the very early Universe, just after the moment of the Big Bang.
And it's not very big, so it doesn't use a lot of space.
I'm offering workshops in several new places, returning to one big and exciting event, booking some awesome vendor engagements, and starting relationships with some very special new studios as well as continuing onward at the amazing Stamford Yoga Center and Tangerine Hot Power Yoga, both of these spaces have treated me incredibly well this year.
My husband and I both use it and it's so much better than any big bulky equipment and takes up very little space.
They take up about the same amount of space as a microwave, so they aren't very big at all!
I love our little space, and it's so very us, but I never ever thought it was truly worthy of a «home feature» on any major publication, let alone, one of the biggest: Style Me Pretty.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z