Sentences with phrase «very clear point»

Recode reports that Mosseri stated that Facebook plans to take a «very clear point of view» on a number of topics on their platform such as «hate speech» and «sensationalist news,» but did not define what these terms mean exactly.

It's like they ran out of time, because at a very clear point, the CG effects team also stopped working so hard on the Manhattan backdrop.

Giroud made a very clear point, he's better than many suggest but nowhere near good enough to be top striker at Arsenal.

It was a very clear point of difference and delivered the group a sustainable competitive advantage.

Chuckled made a very clear point that yours is an opinion about Jesus just as Fred has an opinion about Jesus.

We have a very clear point of view.

Use very clear pointing as the signal / prompt to go (or just bringing him with you).

How anyone could possibly conclude that I was against self - publishers (because yes, I can see how I could hate myself because I am in that category too) after reading all of those VERY CLEAR POINTS.

We also make very clear points about the importance of empathizing with those who are different — and that being different is not synonymous with being bad or sinful or evil.

Not exact matches

And in a tense meeting with flipping «Odd Couple» Mark and Bryan, he makes that point very clear, telling the duo to give up the schtick and take things seriously.

However, «the written communication, by its very nature, suggests that things are more serious at this point and also suggests that maybe [the supervisor's] prior communication wasn't clear enough,» says Steve Kane, a human resources consultant based in Hillsborough, California.

«But Ryan's employers are having him there because he's been cleared and you have to remember, Ryan has relationships with a lot of people personally,» he said, pointing to Oscars host Jimmy Kimmel's recent announcement that he will let Seacrest interview him: «Listen, you know, we should at the very least afford people the opportunity for truth, what the facts of the story are before hanging them out to dry,» Kimmel told Variety.

And, as Jason Del Ray pointed out three years ago in a post about Amazon's refusal to release its Prime figures, while Bezos himself has made it clear that he doesn't care much about what Wall Street thinks, many of his employees care very much about the company's stock price.

Q: But to be very clear, the end point is no more too - big - to - fail?

But it was very clear from the very beginning on the part of the actual Congressmen that they weren't going to support it because they had already come out on the floor with such vehement opposition to the bill and pointing out exactly what was wrong with the bill, that it didn't have to be done in a hurry.

At some point in time none other than Satoshi (of Bitcoin fame) talked to Larimer in very clear terms «If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.»

I'll look for my entry point a little later on,» and frequently, you'll find securities that are showing that type of a trend, a very clear uptrend, sell off after earnings, giving you a nice, tight window, maybe a month or two where you have another opportunity to step in and trade it in advance of earnings.

June will be very interesting as the half way point of the year and will give me a clearer picture of my total 2017 passive income potential.

Since almost everyone has felt guilty about it at some point, it's very clear that masturbation is a sin.

Jesus» teaching about the basileia of God leaves many questions unanswered, but it nevertheless makes some points very clear.

In considering the Providence of God alongside the workings of the JULY / AUGUST 2006 natural laws he goes on to explain: «It is crystal clear that the Christian faith presupposes that God's providence is not just general but is very concrete, reaching down to the smallest and most unlikely details, even to the point that «all the hairs of our head» are numbered.

I felt I made the point very clear.

When we add the obvious point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to claim that the real and significant differences between the use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.

It is not clear, therefore, why Jenson chides me as «subtly sectarian» for making this very point in my own writings.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

One could point out, quite accurately, that Whitehead talks about God and the world in such a way that it is very clear that while God proffers a subjective aim which, if accepted, would result in the greatest good possible under the circumstances, actual entities sophisticated enough to entertain complex contrasts of feeling also thereby have genuine freedom of choice with the result that they are free to reject the aim proffered by God, free to turn their backs on God's lure toward the best possible tomorrow.

It should be very clear now that to speak of the enduring object which constitutes the life of an electron is not by any stretch of the imagination to identify electrons as enduring objects, as Cobb claims, which is the sole point that needs to be made about this passage.

The Bible makes this point very clear, we are living epistles / witnesses read and seen of all men / women!!!

This new confidence was first prompted, unless memory at this point is all wrong, by two very hard facts: the invincibility of a clear - headed medical student dying of cancer, and the impassive bulk of the Rockies above timber line, which I saw for the first time four months later.

The bible is very clear that once you reach the point of no return in relation to the unforgivable sin, the Holy Spirit that is within all of us will withdraw from you completely; you will never feel convicted about your sin and you will be incapable of repenting.

In Luke 7:44 - 48, Jesus turns to the woman and makes the point of this whole passage very clear.

As Robert Wright (an agnostic, with connections to the JTF) pointed it out very clear: «New Atheists» main short - term goal wasn't to turn believers into atheists, it was to turn atheists into New Atheists — fellow fire - breathing preachers of the anti-gospel.

My point is very clear: Reno has not been interested in helping its compulsive gamblers.

«It is clear that both sides have chosen the path of war, open conflict, and the space for political dialogue and cessation of hostilities and mediation is very, very reduced at this point,» deputy U.N. peacekeeping chief Edmond Mulet said.

To make my point clear, I venture now to speak very personally.

From our discussion so far one thing is clear: the crucial point and the very essence of Marx's critique of religion is not its denial of God, but the affirmation and acknowledgment of human autonomy.

I am grateful for the opportunity to do two things in response: first, to clear up a misunderstanding that my article may have suggested; and second, to reemphasize one of the main points of the piece — namely, that pacifists have a very difficult time trying to think in just war terms.

I hope that if / when the book comes out, my point will be more clear — Doctrinal Statements are good when used in their proper place, but just as with anything, they can be very dangerous if used improperly.

This is a point on which Jesus was very clear.

Whitehead is not very clear on this point.

I was a little nervous about some of the parables but every not so clear verse should be looked at in the light of very clear verse and those point to your / my new belief.

And if that's the case, isn't it odd that God could not write a book that was more clear on its very most important point?

(A point which I have attempted to argue in The Gospel of the Kingdom [1940]-RRB- Their interests are very largely centered upon the apostles, but at the same time the surviving tradition within them makes it clear that Jesus» influence upon the populace of Galilee resulted in «multitudes» following him about and hanging upon his words.

a rather pointed open letter implicitly, but very clearly, characterizing Catholic teaching on sexual morality and marriage (and, perhaps, on abortion as well, though that is a little less clear) as «repression,» and implicitly characterizing the Archbishop himself, who is a strong defender of marriage, chastity, and the sanctity of human life, as an oppressor.

Secondly, Paul made it very clear to young Timothy, who was an elder / pastor who was directing the church affairs well, and so was worthy of double honour, that is, honour and respect, as well as being paid wages, which he so clearly pointed out in the context.

But one thing is clear: though the website gives the Church's immemorial teachings about marriage (and does it, it seems to me, mostly rather well) the point is that this is very clearly - as the Church's constant restatement of its unchanging beliefs for each new generation always is - a response to our current situation.

First, it would be very rare, indeed, for a couple to want to stay with the purpose of trying to as you say in a past post: ``... at one point be a witness in that broader group,» the church, when it was sooooo clear that the church and pastor were firm in their stance that the couple were living in sin.

The precise nature of this acting we shall presently turn to, but it should be clear at this point that Leclerc's opinion that a composite substance literally consists of the acting of the minima that compose it, is a very novel view of substance, to say the least, and one which, intuitively, seems fraught with difficulties, since the traditional view of substance is that it is that which acts, not activity or action itself

The point is even if we didn't have end time prophecy and all we had were the examples of how God judged sin in the past, it would be more than enough to make it very clear, God judges sin.

The main points are very clear however.