Sentences with phrase «very dangerous levels»

The second is the urgency of the need for hard - to - imagine action to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions at all scales, that is globally, nationally, and locally, but particularly in high - emitting nations such as the United States in light of the limited amount of ghgs that can be emitted by the entire world before raising atmospheric ghg concentrations to very dangerous levels and in light of the need to fairly allocate ghg emissions reductions obligations around the world.

Sometimes this occurs way down deep, and with others it can occur before parallel and they reach very dangerous levels.

Because the capacity for realizing positive values and the capacity for freedom or self - determination are correlative, rising in proportion with each other, creatures capable of the kinds of values we can enjoy are necessarily creatures with a very dangerous level of freedom.

Not exact matches

at risk of not helping, the AR4 WG3 carbon price range of 30 - 50 USD is based on stabilizing CO2 at 450ppm, a level more recent work has determined to be very dangerous.

Maybe we are just tired of their bullsh.t — and for very good reason — the result of centuries of religious persecution and the result of the dangerous level of political power religion has today.

«A very strong technical level and his combination of technique and power makes him a very dangerous player.

I've been watching Jose Aldo since he destroyed Cub Swanson in the WEC, he was always a dangerous and explosive fighter, technically very sound everywhere, but Max's whole game is on a completely different level and I believe we would've seen the same result if they were both 26 and in the prime of their careers.

Although many rate Pelle as a striker he is unproven at the very top level, he has looked dangerous in qualifying scoring three important goals.

«But at the end of the second half, Johor showed that they are very dangerous, and almost levelled the match.»

According to Gates, laying hen facilities are recognized as a very dusty environment; a dairy facility is a very open, airy environment with lots of fresh air; and a swine - finishing building, although not considered to be terribly dusty, is actually the worst overall in dust level, especially at the most dangerous particulate matter (PM) level.

Though it's clear that there is some level of biochemical noise, «blaming noise every time you see differences among cells is a very dangerous thing,» he said.

Well the virus is a very dangerous virus but we do operate at the highest level of biocontainment, which is Biosafety Levlevel of biocontainment, which is Biosafety LevelLevel 4.

IGF1 levels does not necessarily means that you're gonna get cancer.IGF1 is a metabolic pathway for growth, yes growth in general from muscle tissue, bones, even organs BUT.There is a huge difference from ingecting into yourself, artificial IGF1 HGH etc and causing you body to secrete it naturall.When i say naturally i'm not talking about animal products (i am a vegan btw except some use of honey and bee pollen) animal product consumption is linked to a numerous deseases due to saturated fats, trans fats, high concentrations of sulfuring aminos even heme iron http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23983135.Blaming soy protein (which btw has some great health benefits, general the soy bean) is at least wrong.Ok consuming every day 1 kg of soy probably is not good, as NOTHING is at very high quantities.Nothing wrong with natto, tempeh, tofu, soymilk, soybean, ans SPI.Asian people have been consuming soy for thousands of years without negative effects.Soy and especially SPI for people who are doing serious natural bodybuilding without use of AAS and artificial growth factors, and are also vegans believe me is a pain in the a $ $ and soy protein is maybe the ONLY type of protein that has sufficient ratios of amino acids, from bcaas to even sulfur aminos (but in normal levels not the dangerous levels linked to the homocysteine rise in the blood).

It's very important that type 1 diabetics don't get into a dangerous state called ketoacidosis (very high levels of ketones and glucose).

Those with diabetes can get too high of a level of ketones in their blood, which is very dangerous.

Drinking lots of water during a very long race in the heat, for example — this can even lead to a dangerous condition called hyponatremia, where blood sodium levels drop too low.

«Bananas have shown by studies to possibly regulate blood sugar as they are very moderate in the glycemic index, meaning they don't cause dangerous spikes to your blood sugar levels,» says Dr. Calapai «Having a good banana smoothie for breakfast or as an afternoon snack, as opposed to high - sugar options make sure you are balanced throughout the day.»

To put that number in perspective, even the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says lead levels in water exceeding 15 ppb are very dangerous and must be acted upon.

Cholesterol levels below 180 cause an increased risk of mortality and levels below 150 may be very dangerous.

The odds of 200 carb calories with a glycemic index of 30 generating blood sugar levels that are dangerous — 140 mg / dl or higher — in healthy people is very low.

He states that triglycerides over 100 are very dangerous and are a result of higher post Prangial sugar levels.

Ketoacidosis is a very dangerous condition that makes it difficult for your body to be able to produce a good level of insulin.

Other studies have found that NSAID use during long events, such as a marathon or triathlon, actually decreases kidney function, which can lead to very dangerous issues during exercise, including a decreased ability to properly regulate your sodium and electrolyte status and your hydration levels (27).

While high blood sugar levels may not sound like a big deal, they can actually be very dangerous — even fatal.

If your dog has ingested lots of apple seeds, then you need to take immediate action as the toxicity levels can become dangerous very quickly.

This can be a tricky situation since an unregulated diabetic cat is starving internally — at the cellular level — and restricting calories, in some cases, can be very dangerous.

If the humidity is too high, they are unable to cool themselves, and their temperature will skyrocket to dangerous levels — very quickly.»

\» -iReviewT.com (scored A --RRB- \» Dangerous is without a doubt (no, seriously) the most robust space adventure available... \» -148apps.com \» Dangerous is well worth the money... \» -spacesimcentral.com (5 stars) \» For people who want a really engaging, in - depth experience... Very cool and very fun... \» -TheDaily.com \» Another interesting feature was the \» Romance \» option \» -unboundgamer.com \» An astounding level of depth takes Dangerous where few space sims have gone before... offering factional allegiance and NPC partner systems that are sure to whet the genre fan's appetVery cool and very fun... \» -TheDaily.com \» Another interesting feature was the \» Romance \» option \» -unboundgamer.com \» An astounding level of depth takes Dangerous where few space sims have gone before... offering factional allegiance and NPC partner systems that are sure to whet the genre fan's appetvery fun... \» -TheDaily.com \» Another interesting feature was the \» Romance \» option \» -unboundgamer.com \» An astounding level of depth takes Dangerous where few space sims have gone before... offering factional allegiance and NPC partner systems that are sure to whet the genre fan's appetite.

A Level 1 Uzi is just an Uzi, while a Level 3 could have an extended magazine and a 2x scope, while a Level 4 adds a silencer into the mix, making it a very dangerous weapon in the hands of professionals.

The smallest warming / sea level rise in TAR figure 5 will place a wide range of human and natural systems under very considerable pressure (and based on estimates of the melt - down point for greenland place us teetering on the edge of dangerous climate change).

To make sure I've understood your 2006 article correctly, Dr. Hansen's 10 years to a tipping point is an educated (very educated) estimate of how long we have to stop increasing CO2 ppm (to prevent it going over the dangerous 400ppm level) as opposed to the result of calculations from a computer model.

Dorothy Atwood, one of the course participants, notes that «the reality of increasingly dangerous climate change — the rising temperatures and sea levels; the droughts, floods and stronger storms; the acidic oceans; the increasing forest fires; the expanding health dangers; the economic costs of floods, drought, hurricanes and sunken coastal cities — are very real to us and demand our personal and group response because it makes both environmental and economic sense to change the way we live and solve these problems.»

Tsunamis are much more dangerous than a very small and gradual increase in average sea level.

That said, a quarter century of largely ignoring scientific warnings has left the world unable to stop a number of very dangerous impacts, including sea level rise, ocean acidification, extreme weather, and Dust - Bowlification.

Averages are very dangerous things as it disguises the places where sea level is dropping, as well as rsing.

But billions in US investment to help India move ahead on ambitious targets for expanding its use of wind and solar power, as well as initiatives to clean up the dangerous levels of soot and smog, are very much on the cards.

Although there is considerable scientific evidence that limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C is necessary to prevent very dangerous warming, a fact implicit in the recent Paris Agreement in which nations agreed to work to keep warming as close as possible from exceeding 1.5 degrees C additional warming, if the international community seeks to limit warming to 2 degrees C it must assure that global emissions do not exceed the number of tons of CO2 emissions that will raise atmospheric concentrations to levels that will cause warming of 2 degrees C.

Where the believers in dangerous global warming are so ignorant of the very basics of life and of science at any level they can not even give the atmospheric component they want banned its correct name but use the name of the element which is the basis of ALL life on this planet that of «Carbon» as the item that is to be eliminated from the planet..

As we have seen above, the commitments made according to the Copenhagen Accord and Cancun agreements that have been ratified by the Cancun agreements leave at the very minimum a 5Gt gap between emissions levels that will be achieved if there is full compliance with the voluntary emissions reductions and what is necessary to prevent 2 °C rise, a warming amount that most scientists believe could cause very dangerous climate change.

Heiko, I think that their assumption is that most people have no clue of what the natural or anthropogenic atmospheric levels of CO2 are (note the general tone of the article) but are constantly bombarded with the idea that we are pumping tremendous amounts of a very dangerous gas into it.

There has also been a fairly wide - spread understanding that the international community will not avoid very dangerous climate change unless nations increase their national commitments to levels required of them based upon equity while working with other nations to keep atmospheric concentrations of ghg from exceeding dangerous levels.

This has been going on for 20 years — I remember Greenpeace's very first press release about Golden Rice and how it was dangerous because people (who were dying from VAD) might overdose on vitamin A. Then, when they realized the vitamin levels were low, they turned things around and started saying it wouldn't work at all (as if VAD is a binary problem — lack of vitamin A is a distribution of concentration so any increase will help some people).

In summary, so little is known abut the deeper 50 % of the oceans and their floors that it is dangerous science to state very much at all about mechanisms affecting sea level change.

We are close to the low level at which green things can; t grow and very far from a high level that is dangerous.

But musk xylene is classified as very persistant and very bioaccumulative, so a little bit builds up continuously to potentially dangerous levels.

Keep in mind that medical conditions or a dangerous occupation can increase the cost of your life insurance from just a very small amount to an extreme level depending on what the condition actually is.