Sentences with phrase «very deep need»

She's trying to communicate a very deep need for time and space to learn about the world, to play and grow, and to just «be.»

You had another very deep need to pin our failures on God didn't you?

The search for meaning and identity has always been and always will be a very deep need.

Not exact matches

I think the psychological blocks to thinking about aging run very deep, and we need to think about it in order to really fight it,» he said in a Reddit AMA.

«You need planning to play this complicated game, and these algorithms, deep nets, are not very suited to it.»

The process of diving deep is the very thing that may trigger a broader understanding of what you need to do.

Instead the objective was to assess their capital needs under a deeper and longer recession than was the consensus in early 2009, and then require them to meet these capital needs in the very near term, before the adverse scenario developed.

It is not something that merely celebrates and seals a deep human emotion — although it does echo to the very core of our emotional and psychological needs.

Aristotle and Aquinas know of this need but believe the deeper justification of authority lies in the need to order toward a common good the very superabundance of particular goods possible for human beings.

A third area in which we need very much more of theological preaching is the deeper and more serious aspect of the problem of evil, namely, sin.

Such a poet may have a very deep religious need, and the conception of God is included in his despair.

Can we lose that salvation i believe so if we totally turn away from him by rejecting the conviction of the holy spirit in our lives.I say that because as a new christian i accepted Christ into my life and the holy spirit was convicting me to surrender my heart to him as Lord and i was resisting him i would not surrender to him fully and so he gave me a choice to either accept him or reject him.I believe he gives everyone the chance to make that commitment as Lord of there life.When we make that deeper commitment and follow him he will continue to perfect us through his holy spirit so that we conform to his image.By the way i knew that if i rejected him at that point that was it he would never bother me again i would have been eternally lost the thought was terrifying at the time.There was definitely a spiritual battle being fought over me i was very aware i needed to decide which side i was on.Thankfully i chose the winning one.brentnz

To send a minister forth from seminary without his having confronted himself and human need at a deep level is to graduate him without the very insights which can allow him to make his message relevant to live human beings.

Christ becomes truly universal to the full extent of Christian needs, and in conformity with the deepest aspirations of our age the Cross becomes the Symbol, the Way, the very Act of progress.

«What we discovered was that the local church had a culture of its own and that seminary graduates needed to be prepared to cope with the congregation as a very complex social reality with deep structures and metaphors by which it lives and moves, a social reality which is affected by forces and dynamics of which we know almost nothing.»

Thus the «solution» to the problem of self - deception requires a restructuring of our relations to those social situations and their implied heroics and criteria of worth that may have pressured us into concealing aspects of ourselves in order to gain the approval we seem to need at a very deep level of our being.

But given our very pluralistic environment, in which you're likely to come up against five different worldviews in the course of a day's encounters with the media, you need a way of thinking, imagining and acting that makes deep sense, and that allows you to adapt and improvise in relation to these diverse views.

We learn of the importance he attached to daily Mass, his fidelity to prayer, the rosary, promoting Eucharistic adoration, weekly confession of sins, his attention to the needs of others as though he or she were the only one he'd ever met, his self - sacrifice in imitation of Maximillian Kolbe whom he had canonised; most importantly, we learn of his very deep understanding of how life is transformed through chastity for married and single alike.

Pat: Every pioneer needs our prayers, but people like Rob Bell have no illusions that what they are saying will not only stir the waters of religiosity, but dredge up some very deep seated monsters while they're at it.

You need to realize, like I painfully did, that the very one who is always claiming to be loyal actually may be desperately fighting their deeper urges to betray you.

She also emphasizes the importance to give enough space in between tomato plants for best flavor and juicy tomatoes, and pointed that leggy tomato plants need to be transplanted deeper among many other details that have been very valuable to apply on my little, garden.

Thank you for those meaningful and deep words, Sasha - they're very much needed, especially right now as I continue to struggle / journey through this life of mine and try to figure out who I am, who I want to be, who I can be, what I want to do, what I want to stand for, and so forth < 3 Now, on a different note, I'm curious to hear more about your projects soon, and, as far as breakfast goes, my go - to is good ol' oatmeal with a little bit of oat milk, flaxseeds and an apple (tea on the side, of course!)

We would have a deep and very strong squad as we will need it as Utd, City, Chelsea, Spurs & Liverpool will all have great squads with a great manager at the helm (Mourinho to Utd, Conte to Chelsea, Pep to City, Klopp at Liverpool & Poch at Spurs).

One of these is our great defender and key player Laurent Koscielny, who Wenger plucked from relative obscurity and helped to make one of the very best around, so The Mirror has reported our centre back declaring his deep gratitude and the sense that he needs to repay that faith.

We are looking very thin carzola wont be back elneny is out until at least the end of February we need to bluster our midfield our attacking midfield yes we can shuffle around with elexis and ozil and iwobi but is it the long term answer no I do nt think so as the attacking midfield is the place where most injuries occur along the side of the defense so if any one else gets injured we will very short and in deep trouble maybe after all we should call upon fabergas if no one else is available on a personal preference I would prefer veratie

I am very upset... We can't score a team fighting for relegation... We definitely need one striker and a winger... We can't play santi in deeper position... We require schniderlin, Pedro and cavani or jovetic.

He's a bit overrated I must say.I also don't get those who are asking him to tackle well.The fact is he's not a good tackler.I fear Wenger has made him untouchable in our team such that even if he plays badly he still starts.I mean if people are saying he's not a DM in the first place then is he also a CM?If he's a CM does he have the quality to play along side a DM?These are the questions we need to ask ourselves.If he's a CM then he's good at distributing from deep and also up top but he can't hold thd ball in tight spaces or dribble which is very important.If he's a DM then he simply can't defend.That's why for us to be successful in the long term with him we need a hybrid midfielder or what I call a defensive box to box midfielder.

They're not very deep and they've been holding out hope that Solomon Hill can help fill provide some much - needed wing support when he returns from injury sometime in the next month or so.

«We've had some practise [against teams who sit back at the Emirates] but we also don't forget the ingredients that are needed to play against a team who is very deep.

So wait a minute.Are Arsenal looking for a defensive midfielder or a box to box player.I'm really disappointed in Xhaka's defending.He's very good with his long passing but I don't think he's the best option when it comes to box to box.In Arsenal he's normally used as the defensive midfielder particular deep lying playmaker and this actually means that we need someone who is fantastic at attacking and can also do very well defensively so as to compliment for Xhaka's defensive short comings.Ludo Goretzka is very good defensively from the little I've seen but I don't really know much about his attacking qualities.But I also hope Arsenal does not forget about Mario Lemina.He's a complete midfielder and to me has the capabilities to be one of Europe's best if given the chance.He can defend very well and attack very well.He's a player Juventus would regret selling.As for Goretzka I know he's very good defensively but have» t seen much of him in terms of attack.If he's as good as in attack I'd sign him.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

He needs to work harder defensively, think pass - first and stop taking contested and very deep three's.

He could be very effective in some games that we need to defend deep and head loads of balls out.

Some of Liverpool's pervading issues are obvious: we need both competent centre - backs and a coherent defensive structure; we need to reorganise and solidify our midfield; we aren't pressing very well; the squad isn't deep...

The depth chart, as it stands today, only makes that clear, especially in midfield and attack where there is very little depth of the kind Liverpool will surely need if they are to make a deep run in Europe and hold on to a top four spot in the league.

All 3 of them were available when I expected them to be but overall I felt it was a very deep draft in the positions we needed, which is why we didn't need much in Free Agency.

There is no doubt that an A-League club needs a guaranteed level of capital behind them, but to pile a license fee on top of it makes it difficult for anyone for anyone without very deep pockets such as the Bakries, the Ledman Group and the City Football Group.

In that case, the club needs to replace the 2013 - 14 version of Verlander, who has recently been somewhere behind Max Scherzer and Price on a very deep rotation.

Spartak will need to defend deep in numbers, with a compact line of four and five very difficult to break down in theory.

It's very easy to keep one of these carriers clean without having to worry about taking it apart, dealing with the loss of important buckles or snaps, trying to spot - clean when you really need to do a deep clean, or trying to manage a carrier that keeps shrinking in the dryer.

I never ventured into other types of comics as they seemed to have tiny writing which looked cramped, yeah not very sophisticated reason to not read them, but give me a break, I was young and did not need deep reasons to like or not like something.

I mean, we're mammals, too, so regardless of the countless ways in which we're nothing like our pets, the biological event of birth reaches deep to reveal that our needs are ultimately very similar.

The bowl of these spoons is not very deep, so older babies and toddlers may need to upgrade to larger spoons later on.

Slings are very discreet — you have to dig deep into them to see the baby, which most strangers won't do, so your baby can nurse through your whole trip to the grocery store if need be.

I talked about racial harmony and got very, very earnest about the need for white people to realize the deep racial fissures in American society.

While actually engaging in the methods of sleep training, I experienced a deep sense of what each of them needed as individuals in a very focused and intense way.

Some women experience symptoms of a bipolar depression, which is a cyclical, deep depression with periods of very high energy, decreased need for sleep, and changing moods (mania).

This is very useful if your baby is sick in bed or has a leaky nappy and you need to deep clean.

The very fact that we need such a definition, the very fact that social scientists need to work so hard to be included in policy discussions to the same extent as, say, economists (held in high esteem as being infallible, such as they are these days, naturally...), could be symptomatic of something deeper than social scientists being bad lobbyists.

Very good question and I am surprised that I as German needed to dig deeper into the stuff than anticipated.