Sentences with phrase «very different arguments»

There are two very different arguments when it comes to training your abs.

In any case, Booker's views on 21st century temperature trends have no bearing on his very different argument regarding group think, which I find convincing.

Not exact matches

One argument with superficial attractiveness is that the old regimes failed these countries, and therefore something else — preferably very different from the old regime — will solve the problem.

That is very different than the argument I hear repeated on this site that one can not prove something does not necessarily exist.

That's not an argument for God, but it does tell a very different story about Him from the one told by Fry.

But of course that is a confusion; it confuses an argument that P and Q are consistent with the very different enterprise of explaining Q, given the truth of P.

It is a very nice summary of different kinds of arguments.

Conceived as we now conceive them, as so many fortunate escapes from almost limitless processes of destruction, the benevolent adaptations which we find in Nature suggest a deity very different from the one who figured in the earlier versions of the argument.

As this summary brings out, Kim's argument involves treating two very different kinds of «observability» as if the difference between them were irrelevant.

Prof. Novak may surely disagree with my arguments, but that is very different from suggesting that I have deliberately tried to mislead people» a charge that is both untrue and defamatory.

We have no idea that there might be other types of life in other parts of the universe or through a black hole into another universe that have very different narrow constrictions for environment that this argument says is prime for us.

But if our argument in this book is correct, the real situation is very different.

Despite their very obvious christian undertones, I though that the last book contained an argument against religion (more - so organized religion, which is a bit different), where the donkey and the monkey pretend to respectively be and be acting for Aslan (the Jesus symbol) and their actions result in widespread chaos, and the eventual collapse of Narnia.

But it is question - begging to use that argument to defend the very existence of such a deity against the appearances (which is very different from Whiteheadians using their principles to illuminate the appearances).

«8 He even echoed the argument that some of the Southern apologists used for very different purposes; namely that the slave is in some degree better off than the factory worker since he never faces the uncertainties of unemployment or the pangs of actual physical want that afflict the latter.

some of it not so good however, because we wanted our relationship to be different from our parents, we wrote our own service and that process was incredibly valuable we had massive arguments and really thrashed out what commitment meant to us and that I think has served us through harder times we are very happy and have two wonderful sons they are musicians Ben and Alfie I'd put a link but I don't know how you can just google them though I think you'd like them:)

Each of these players has compelling — albeit very different — arguments as to why they should win this award.

The arguments are very promising, and they are supported with an intelligent and in - depth analysis in the different chapters.

Special relationship After the Bush years, after Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and Iraq, this post-Suez argument may well resonate tonight, though Mr Clegg may not sound very different from David Cameron on it.

My argument is: that the spending cuts might look very different in four years» time; that David Cameron has an incentive to give the Lib Dems something to show for their partnership; and that hung parliaments are likely to continue to be the norm.

These arguments underpin two very different books, Cat Wars by Peter Marra, director of the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, and writer Chris Santella; and The Trainable Cat by biologist John Bradshaw and animal psychologist Sarah Ellis.

The desert Southwest; it is a lot of area and it sounds like a huge amount of area, but actually there is a map in the article that shows five or six — if you divide it up just for argument sake — into five or six massive installations, they would fit very nicely in few different parts of the desert Southwest, where of course the solar radiation is highest all year long.

The Republican Party in particular has changed, and the moral arguments made in this Republican convention were very different.

In effect the argument is that if you've been a soldier, and you have some of these kinds of symptoms, that you are very likely to be labeled as having PTSD; and in fact, maybe you're suffering from a completely different problem or something that's not even a really deep - seeded problem at all.

Yet what is observed in a dozen of these bodies is quite different: the values of the semi-major axis are very disperse (between 150 AU and 525 AU), the average inclination of their orbit is around 20 ° and argument of Perihelion -31 °, without appearing in any case close to 180 °.

If part of the argument is that the meat people eat today is very different from the meat paleolithic humans ate, can't the same be said about the plants we eat today?

But I can't see how the argument that the ratio of amino acids is different can hold much validity - I don't think the ratio is very different for vegans and omnivores when you take into account our natural protein combining behavior over a period of a few meals.

Three very different, unrealistic, artificial scenarios or course, but I just toss them out to show that there seems to be a point at which one's emotional response overrides most logical utilitarian arguments.

And it's one of several cockamamie arguments advanced by viewers given a platform for their unconventional theories in Room 237, an odd duck of a documentary about the conclusions reached by five different Kubrick fans upon very close analysis of The Shining.

My argument here is that a «diverse provider» environment (where an area has an array of operators running an array of schools) allows for a very different kind of accountability system.

But the debate in Britain over school choice is very different from that in the United States and is mired — as sooner or later everything is in Britain — in arguments over class and privilege.

«The job of, say, taking on a school in special measures in a very challenging community is very different to that of running a grammar school, and the DNA argument, that there's something about grammar schools that you can just transplant into a failing school, does not stack up,» he said.

There are different parts of your thesis and it is very essential that before anything else, you must collect decent amount of data to ensure proper basis on making arguments and opinions of your thesis.

It could very well be argued that being able to join all these different guilds as just odd, but I have a logical, well thought out argument to that: shut up, minion.

I think that that argument, that line, might very well have led to Wade and lots of other smart artists who are making paintings for reasons that are really quite different than the artists of my generation.

There could be no better argument for this distinction than Fred Sandback: Vertical Constructions, the radiant exhibition currently on display at David Zwirner's West 20th Street location, where the gallery's three large rooms perfectly encapsulate three very different aspects of Sandback's art.

It's not that Gavin's argument is wrong, but rather that it omits separate, independent evidence that reinforces the same conclusion from a very different angle.

The physics argument seems simply that (1) past climates have been very different from today (true); (2) the changes are large compared to what we see from global warming, or expect to see, anytime soon (true).

Of course, Judith» sviews have shifted since 2009 as she has more and often very different data and arguments available.

What does happen, has happened, in the past with articles like the one Science published is not so very different in a number of ways from what Rud Istvan, Steve McIntyre and others have done in blogs — bluntly point out deficits, tactlessly remark on flaws and fault, explore unreservedly whether any facet associated with an article or paper weakens its arguments.

This analysis should be conducted now, before we spend vast sums trying to mitigate global warming (and even then, one can make a very good argument that adapting to warming is cheaper than preventing it, but again that's a different post).

'' trying to come up with or re-post every possible argument under the sun to all but argue against the basic concept that radically altering the atmosphere on a multi million year basis is going to affect the net energy balance of earth, which over time is going to translate into a very different climate (and ocean level) than the one we've comfortably come to rely on.

While actual scientists are trying to piece together every little part of an otherwise almost un-piecable long term chaotic and variable system in response now to a massive increase in net lower atmospheric energy absorption and re radiation, Curry is busy — much like most of the comments on this site most of the time — trying to come up with or re-post every possible argument under the sun to all but argue against the basic concept that radically altering the atmosphere on a multi million year basis is going to affect the net energy balance of earth, which over time is going to translate into a very different climate (and ocean level) than the one we've comfortably come to rely on.

In fact the argument is complex so there are a number of very different questions that we are trying to answer.

The obvious answer is because, if you take the uncertain risks of rapidly accellerating CO2 - concentrations and warming seriously, actions follow that are very different than those you would take based only on resilience arguments or reducing air toxins.

«This entire process has been an exercise in re-educating myself about the climate debate and, in the process, I can honestly say that I have heard very convincing arguments from all the different sides, and I think I'm actually more neutral on the issue now than I was before I started this project.

In that case, there is no ITC - specific argument: Motorola can just say that a district court decision from a different circuit (7th Circuit) shouldn't matter in Seattle (9th Circuit)-- but Judge Posner's FRAND thinking will be taken very seriously there, I'm sure.

I like to see employees who are confident in displaying their personal viewpoints and setting out their arguments intelligently, but this is very different to saying something which you know could cause offence.

The very argument highlighted above, that people can't agree as to whether the word, and its associated meaning, exist in different languages, reminds me of how people can't agree in English as to what is or is not «fair.»

«It's a very extraordinary animal in legal culture to have two different proceedings addressing the same question that lead to different results,» Chief Justice John Roberts noted during Monday's oral arguments.