Sentences with phrase «very different books»

Both bodies of work highlight the poignant conjunctions between image and text in these found cultural artifacts, culling material from two very different books that each appear to be one thing but end up revealing quite another.

These are two very different books.

This April, we reviewed two very different books by best - selling authors... with the exact same title.

«I'm intrigued by the contrasts and resonances that are set up when you put seven very different books and authors together.

People borrow very different books from the book they buy,» she said.

My biggest mistake as an author was trying to imitate authors who are very different people and who write very different books from my own.

These are two very different books on the role of religion in schooling.

Reviewed by Nathan Glazer These are two very different books on the role -LSB-...]

Despite that, they have written very different books.

These arguments underpin two very different books, Cat Wars by Peter Marra, director of the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, and writer Chris Santella; and The Trainable Cat by biologist John Bradshaw and animal psychologist Sarah Ellis.

Nonetheless, even without this movement we can begin to work on helping our students to develop a Catholic imagination, as several very different books have recently suggested.

Like two other albeit very different books — Michael Novak's Tell Me Why and George Weigel's Letters to a Young Catholic — this one opens a conversation that more and more people will want to have, given the world they've grown up in and the unbidden desire of so many to know a different one.

Bible Road is a very different book from Church Signs Across America, in large part because the Paulsons stood in front of a lot of signs and took snapshots of them, whereas Fentress is a gifted artist whose photographs embrace the varying moods and textures of the many distinctly American scenes he portrays.

The Bible would have been «a very different book and may have produced a very different history for mankind,» had it drawn on the work of philosophers and writers as opposed to prophets and apostles, says Grayling, a philosopher and professor at Birkbeck College, University of London, who is an atheist.

When She Woke is, to say the least, a very different book from your debut novel, Mudbound.

Not exact matches

For example, if your goal for the book is to help you book keynote speeches at major HR conferences, then the requirements for your book are very different than if your goal is to write a book that establishes your credibility and authority in a specific field so you can build a consulting business.

Now, we've always had a small number of very powerful players — what we're saying in the book is there's a very high likelihood that it could be a different set of players if the traditional industry folks don't move quickly.

This is a book that does ask a similar kind of question, but in a very different way.

If you start disrupting books, especially about what little girls can be when they grow up, and if you start putting different characters in those stories, you're able to disrupt power in a very important way.

Still, most literature has focused on each country in isolation — there have been reports on UK equity crowdfunding, articles on Canadian equity crowdfunding, and books on US equity crowdfunding — but very little on equity crowdfunding in totality, and nothing at all on what campaigns from different parts of the world can learn from each other.

The two ideas should be kept locked in boxes very separately from one another — like I say, two different rule books.

Certainly the book world of today is very different from the book world of just a few years ago.

Well, if it comes down to holy books, the oldest of the scriptures — the Rigveda of India has a take which is very different and much more in accordance with what science is finding:

king has written 70 books and some are VERY different from others.

Old Testament = Judiasm, add New Testament = Christian, add Koran = Islam but add Book of Mormon and it's Mormonism with a whole different view of the very nature of Deity.

I'm a better person when I'm not weighed down by a book of mythology written by relatively ignorant people who lived in a very specific culture which is utterly different than our own.

But the end - times of the first Christians, on which Bible - believing Christians of today fasten their attention, are very different from our current end - times, described in Part I of this book.

First, it is trying to articulate how contemporary rock seems to be in a pattern of Perpetual Repetition, but how that mode is different from the Retro Rock and Roll stance that arose in the late 70s / early 80s — this is very much a response to, or a working out of my own thinking in the light of, Simon Reynolds» fine book Retromania.

Because I have myself been met by the love of God in Jesus and seek to follow him, the book will be colored by my own experience of and reflections upon the Christian faith, but I hope I shall be fair to those whose way of being Christian is very different to my own.

In my book Jewish Renewal: A Path to Healing and Transformation, I point out that in the original Hebrew version the word for «the Lord» that calls Abraham to sacrifice his son is very different than the word for the angel of God (YHVH) who tells Abraham to NOT GO THROUGH WITH IT, and that the reason we Jews celebrate Abraham as the father of our people is NOT because of his faith in being willing to carry out this violent and bloody act, but rather because he was able to hear the voice of God as a voice that allowed him (and through him all subsequent Jewish and Muslim believers) to NOT FOLLOW THE VOICE OF CRUETLY AS SOMEHOW THE VOICE OF GOD.

Oddly enough, Augustine was writing about the mysteries found within the book of Genesis, when he said, «in matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received.

At the other end of ideology, another new book suggests a very different path.

And just for the record, although I would agree with Marcussen that the Sabbath command is still relevant for Christians, there is a lot in his book that I personally disagree with, or at the least, that I understand in a very different way than Marcussen does.

Had Paul been put in his place at Antioch, and Gentiles been required to accept the Law in order to be Christian, then the Church Fathers would have selected different books, ones supporting that view, when they canonized the Bible hundreds of years later, and you would very likely be arguing the other side now, right?

Neal Donald Walsch's three volumes of Conversations with God and his other books, including, most recently The New Revelation., emerged out of a very different personal situation.

But I am convinced that this is a matter not of personal taste — I love drama as much as epic, in the abstract, and I probably enjoy Dostoevsky's books as much as Tolstoy's, if in a very different way — but simply of good taste.

The Book of Ecclesiastes is in a very different vein.

Contemporary study of the early Christian movement presents a very different, much more diverse and complicated picture of it than that summarized by Martin in this book.

Yes, Christians claim that their bible is «very clear» on sin and other things... but yet for some reason there are now thousands of different denominations all interpreting the same book differently.

Those religions which refer back to Abraham — Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — are in their different ways, and they are often very different ways, religions of the book.

Theists think they already have all the answers in their 2,000 year old book written via hearsay from a couple dozen different people covering a span of time of something like 5,000 years and conveniently geographically focused on one very small area of the Earth.

But if our argument in this book is correct, the real situation is very different.

Despite their very obvious christian undertones, I though that the last book contained an argument against religion (more - so organized religion, which is a bit different), where the donkey and the monkey pretend to respectively be and be acting for Aslan (the Jesus symbol) and their actions result in widespread chaos, and the eventual collapse of Narnia.

In the end, both books, in very different ways, debunk the notion that homeschooling families or strategies are easy to pigeonhole, or that they are flawless.

This lady is on the right track but she should take the next step and realize that the bible is what it is — a book of fairy tales written by a very diverse group of people, but each one with a somewhat different idea of what their fabricated god might expect of them.

A bit about my book «Religious Literacy» (Americans are very religious, but know almost nothing about their own religions), a bit about my newest project, «God is Not One» (no, religions are not different paths up the same mountain) and some humor thrown in here and there.

You make a lot of assertions, but can not provide any support beyond a book of ancient tribal superstitions, one of many such books (that all say very different things about Gods and morals).

These diverse writers each had very different target audiences, disparate life circumstances and specific agendas for their work; so we don't approach each book the same way — for the same reason you wouldn't read a poem about leaves the same way you read a botany textbook.

Scripture has been very important in your theological work, but your approach is different from those who treat the Bible as a rule book or a guidepost.

(ENTIRE BOOK) For Kelsey, «Athens» (based on the Greek paideia, «culturing,» «character formation,») and «Berlin» (based on the German Wissenschaft, «orderly,» «disciplined critical research,» «professional») represent two very different — and ultimately irreconcilable — models of excellent education.