People think
our very early ancestors were carnivores, but the work of Perry & Dominy on the amylase gene suggests otherwise.
Not exact matches
It's also really illuminating, I think, to realize that
very early on our
ancestors, meaning the people who created scripture, metaphorized their history, and we have often then historicized their metaphors.
Indeed, a
very early remnant of the witnessing tradition posited a striking contrast, as we have had occasion to notice before in Chapter Two: «The God of our
ancestors raised up Jesus, whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree» (Acts 5:30, emphasis mine).
To survive, our
early ancestors had to do several things repeatedly and
very well: locate food, escape predators, mate and protect offspring.
«The papaya Y might well resemble the
ancestor of the human Y at a
very early stage of evolution,» Ming says.
Accessing Ancient Genomes — New techniques and
very old bones pushed back the limits of genome sequencing for our
early ancestors.
New techniques and
very old bones overcome the limits of genome sequencing for prehistoric horses, ancient cave bears, and even our own
early ancestors.
«The tiny size and
very basal evolutionary position of Archicebus support the idea that the
earliest primates, as well as the common
ancestor of tarsiers and anthropoids, was miniscule.
Some of those fossils have been passed down from
very early human
ancestors.
Dr. Daniel Gebo, an expert on the evolution of body anatomy in primates, said that, «The tiny size and
very basal evolutionary position of Archicebus support the idea that the
earliest primates, as well as the common
ancestor of tarsiers and anthropoids, were miniscule.
Very recently, scientists have been able to detect pigment - containing granules, called melanosomes, in some very early bird fossils, as well as in their immediate ancestors, the dinosa
Very recently, scientists have been able to detect pigment - containing granules, called melanosomes, in some
very early bird fossils, as well as in their immediate ancestors, the dinosa
very early bird fossils, as well as in their immediate
ancestors, the dinosaurs.
The dating of this species is significant, in that a date
earlier than habilis makes this species the first habiline, and with its
very large brain, a candidate for being a direct human
ancestor.
They didn't have any knowledge of nutrition, they weren't able to eat nutritious, calorie dense food whenever they wanted due to the absence of agriculture, and their immune systems were likely weaker than ours (living together in large numbers placed enormous selective pressure on our
early agricultural
ancestors to develop strong immune systems, keep in mind that
early human civilizations did not have indoor plumbing... so they were sometimes exposed to fecal matter both from fellow humans and from livestock and they didn't have the kinds of disinfectants and anti-biotics we have today,) so for them to have serious health complications makes perfect sense, nature can be
very harsh and doesn't care how long its been since your last meal or what your calorie and micro nutrient needs are... a lot of people died at
very young ages back then simply because they got sick and didn't have proper medical treatment or due to malnutrition or starvation.
James Siena's paintings are compact, intricate, finely crafted and geometric but at the same time
very idiosyncratic abstractions, distantly related to
early American modernists (he invokes Arthur Dove, Marsden Hartley and Georgia O'Keefe as cherished
ancestors).
I suggest look at the fossil sequences of human
ancestors from
early apes to australopithicus, homo erectus and homo habilis to homo sapiens, and notice how they morph one into the other quite smoothly, all explained by Darwinian evolution, while with respect the old testament verision is clearly a creation myth like you find in
early greek and roman culture etc, an imaginative guess, and
very implausible in light of our current understanding of things.