yeah this is
a very flawed argument.
This is common,
very flawed argument made by atheist.»
Not exact matches
This feeling was shared by many who pointed out
flaws in Dawkins»
arguments or, at the
very least, questioned the certainty the scientist holds that all religion is a load of rubbish.
The watchmaker
argument is
flawed in that equates something that does not occur in nature, and applies the logic of design and purpose onto nature in a
very arbitrary way.
Gunnerman, all
very true but there is a
flaw in your
argument relating top performance to winning the league.
Those things might be a pointer to their capabilities, but it is
very often
flawed as an
argument, since it completely arbitrary.
«population about the size of the state of Massachusets» is a
flawed variation of the homogeneity
argument which is discarded by the
very / more diverse examples of France, England, Denmark, Holland, Belgium
There is a
very clear sense in which I am being unfair to The Congress as I am writing about a dramatic film rather than a philosophical essay but Folman's decision to critique dramatic artifice whilst engaging in dramatic artifice means that The Congress draws your attention away from the drama and towards the film's
flawed philosophical
argument.
In this regard, the diversification
argument suffers from some
flaws, as the variance - covariance characteristics of asset classes is dynamic over time, so a portfolio may
very well be more volatile than would be expected from historical data.
But Claymore was
very vocal about why cap - weighted indexes are
flawed, and iShares would counter with
arguments saying that other strategies were questionable.
To keep Chris V happy, I'm going to pick you up on this and point out that if consensus AGW theory had such an obvious
flaw, we wouldn't all be sitting around here having this
argument, as it would have been spotted a
very long time ago.
What does happen, has happened, in the past with articles like the one Science published is not so
very different in a number of ways from what Rud Istvan, Steve McIntyre and others have done in blogs — bluntly point out deficits, tactlessly remark on
flaws and fault, explore unreservedly whether any facet associated with an article or paper weakens its
arguments.