Sentences with phrase «very flawed research»
Ill - informed commentators opposed to overnights for infants and toddlers have been relying on misleading interpretations of very flawed research to argue that young children need to spend most of their time, and every night, in the care of one parent.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ Not exact matches
Most of the parrioted studdies are very flawed, to be honest out of the ones I looked into they were flawed I have not yet researched all of them.
If you look into the science, you begin to see patterns of behavior that are strikingly similar to the what is being discussed in climate science: manipulation of research, improperly conducted studies, political machinations and influence, and so on, to the point that I read in a recent article in the Altlantic that a very highly regarded researcher in this field claims that up to 90 % of these studies are either flawed or totally inaccurate.
While I have read of accounts by skeptical scientists of how they are selectively funneled out of the funding process, the level of coordination it would take to virtually eliminate any funding for good research scientists who might reach findings that diverge with what we are calling «consensus» here seems far too complicated logistically to be doable — particularly when you consider those very same scientists are frequently characterized by the the folks who make such claims about inequities in research funding as being so incompetent they are unable to see «obvious» flaws in their scientific reasoning.
If somebody were to believe that scientific AGW was «significantly flawed» they would require very substantial evidence to overturn thousands of peer reviewed research papers from the world's top experts.
Indeed, we have very good reason to believe the data that were attacked the most, that collected by the Hadley Center and Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, (unintentionally) lowballed the rate of recent warming (see The deniers were half right: The Met Office Hadley Centre had flawed data — but it led them to UNDERestimate the rate of recent global warming).
They suggested that some of the less favorable findings for their position might have some methodological flaws and that the research supporting their view was very important and well done.