Sentences with phrase «very good creation»

With these practices, we can begin to embrace the gift of God's very good creation — our bodies and the Earth.

I must say these pancakes turned out to be my very best creation.

A showcase collection of nearly 200 outstanding sample resumes and 12 cover letters representing the very best creations of professional resume writes.

Not exact matches

Also, notwithstanding a silly fiscal policy and the ongoing political impasse, the U.S. economy has some very good things going for it now, as even king of doom, Nouriel Roubini, couldn't help but note: the Fed is going to stick to its asset - buying regime for the foreseeable future, providing a monetary protein shake the recovery still very much needs; the housing rebound is well on its way, which is helping Americans rebuild their wealth and is boosting employment in many states with high jobless rates; and the shale oil and gas revolution continues to power investment, job creation and revenue growth.

Join Bourbon enthusiasts from all over the world, along with master distillers and brand ambassadors, to enjoy Bluegrass - inspired culinary creations, live music and entertainment — including a headline performance by Sundy Best on Saturday, September 16 — and, of course, the very best of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, KentuBest on Saturday, September 16 — and, of course, the very best of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, Kentubest of Bourbon in the Bourbon Capital of the World ®, Bardstown, Kentucky.

The government's job creation record since the recessionis is not very good, no matter how hard they try to spin it.

Another reason for the outperformance could very well be that over a longer time frame, giving good management teams the ability to run a business without concerns over meeting short - term expectations may lead to long - term shareholder value creation.

As far as I can ascertain, it would not have been in the first six days, for at the end of the creation week, God proclaimed that all of creation was very good.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one tCreation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one tcreation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

God is not wrong and creation is very good.

The Biblical accounts of God - to - human relationship and affairs going from the very obvious to the very mysterious, starting with creation and going through a multitude of stages, the fall, the expulsion and curse, trials and covenants, rebellion and Law, culminating with God's «Ultimate Provision» for Salvation, the «Good News» of the Lord Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, the «New Covenant,» the «Millennial Kingdom» to come, the end of time, and the afterlife, are the basis for the Christian Theology on «Time Dispensations.»

The evil they accomplished soon became so great, it threatened the very existence of God's good creation.

Similarly, Kekes (a nonbeliever) claims, religious theories that posit the goodness of creation run aground: The «very existence of evil... constitutes a reason against believing in a morally good order.»

Their characterization of the world as God's creation is marked by the reiterated verdict, «It is good, it is good, it is good, it is very good.»

This «one magnificent sweep of creation», to use Holloway's words, re-founds and renews the Church's theology of creation as well as filling out our insight into the very identity of Jesus Christ.

Once we establish the idea that Eden was perfect, rather than it being Good and at best, Very Good, we begin a frantic journey of a restoration of perfection and salvation is finding a way to forgive fallen broken creation for its lapse from perfection so we can be loved by «God» again.

apparently you don't take the Word (logos) very seriously, however your definitely on the right course in Daniel and creation mathematics might give you a better clue here the 70 weeks are matched to the ministry, death and martyr of steven to start the church age 7 year long week.

The creation is good, it is very good, but it is not divine.

So we have first the creation, which was very good and lasted for 7 days.

Well shoot... I guess we better get busy telling all the creation believing scientists that they can go home.They're employer's are going to be very disappointed.

You can not be a good Physicist and be a Creationist becasue then you would be denying the very physics that explains the creation of stars and the conclusion that it is a process that takes millions of years.

Hence, if we situate the call of Abraham, as well as other special revelatory moments of the history of religion, within the wider context of cosmic evolution, this may help soften the «scandal of particularity» associated with any unique or distinctive summoning by God of a particular people to bear witness in a novel way to the divine promise and mystery that come to expression first in the very creation of the world.

God created his world to be «very good,» but we corrupted his creation by attempting to be our own gods and goddesses and by trying to shape...

And we have already emphasized again and again that what God is «up to» in the creation, as well as in human life, is the bringing to actual realization of the potentialities which are given to both in the very fact of their being created.

Creation is good: «God saw all that he (Sic) had made, and it was very good» Gen. 1:31.

a very thin skinned religious person who basically focuses all of his energy on worshiping on himself... What do you call it when the President disregards the definition of radical islamic muslims... wolf in sheep clothing... The bigger issue at hand is the economy, job creation, national debt, and maintaining a good middle class... all of which over the last 4 years has been failing..

Even if you believe in creation, let the light of «It is very good!»

Before a «very good» creation, there was a formless emptiness.

The finished work is reviewed by Moses and the conclusion of the matter is set in language strongly reminiscent of the account of Creation, where «God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good» (Gen. 1:31).

Here's a quote from William Stringfellow's book, An Ethic for Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land: ``... the basic conflict among all principalities remains, though it be subdued or concealed for awhile, because the only morality governing each principality is its own survival as over against very other principality, as well as over against human beings and, indeed, the rest of Creation.

Now Eve, being more easily deceived because she was a woman (even though everything in creation was «very good»), was tricked by the Serpent (Satan embodied) into eating from this tree because the Serpent told her that if she ate from it she would be like God.

This canopy of water kept the bad rays from the sun (even though all creation was «very good») from attacking man's sensitive skin and causing them to age faster.

Here's an example, linked to the connection between creation and forgiveness: the claim of the Bible is that God created a world that is very good.

Our Godly father of all things created is awesomely grand and He may well have had too many first born sons when in the very beginnings of Creationism, God had to do away with many of them in order for their survival of the most fittest sons to begin building all these celestial creations we know of as suns, and stars and moons and planets,,,

These two are meant to be good for each other, the very crown of the goodness of creation, for they are the animal that has logos, capable of speaking and hearing, and therefore of teaching and learning the word of God.

They describe the archbishop as «a brilliant scholar who had very good reasons for his conclusions concerning the date of creation.»

That God transcends creation — He is a thing apart; He wanted His creation and made it a gradual process, and He made it good; we're made in His image and likeness and we're very good; on the seventh day, God rests and creation basks in His delight.

It is not at all inappropriate to see God's hesed as underlying the very act of initial as well as continuing creation.

I especially love the moment in the second creation account that matches the culmination of the first creation account, when God sees everything he has made and «behold, it was very good» (Gen. 1:31).

So just as the «not good» in Genesis 2 matches the silence about the goodness of creation on day two in Genesis 1, I think we should be looking for the moment in Genesis 2 that matches that culminating «very good» in Genesis 1.

Surely he would have known that it would have been better for those humans to never have been born (in fact, the Bible says this very thing), and surely this all - compassionate deity would have foregone the creation of a universe destined to imperfection in which many of the humans were doomed to eternal suffering.

Reading the first creation account in light of the second, we see that the creation is not called «very good» until we have the human male and female.

These are all expressions of what God created that was very good and after creation rested.

But in that quick moment in the pine trees, I knew deeply that creation was very good.

Of all the «goods» stated by God throughout his process of creation, none equaled the «very good» creation of man together with woman.

We say that Christ is «the key, the centre and the purpose of the whole of human history» (Vatican II, Gaudium et Spes, n. 10), as well as unlocking the very meaning of all creation.

And as part of that offering, we would share in his love and compassion and concern for each other in that communion which is the Church, and in God's love for all that he made, especially for humanity - which, at the dawn of creation, God saw as very good.

Even more importantly, when we work for creation's well - being, we also work for the health, dignity and wellbeing of the 70 percent of the world's poorest people who depend on it for their very survival.

The view of humankind is high — humans are the crown of a creation that God calls good every step along the way and, finally, very good.

God created his world to be «very good,» but we corrupted his creation by attempting to be our own gods and goddesses and by trying to shape our own futures apart from him.