Whilst there's
a very good narrative and story to Call of Juarez, it's spoilt by some badly implemented mechanics and, at times, ugly texturing and slowdown.
The story is very sweet and has
a very good narrative structure.
Of course, choosing the very best films out of Martin Scorsese's filmography is a near impossible task, but these ten, in chronological order, are considered among
his very best narrative films.
Not exact matches
Content marketing is all about presenting yourself in the
very best light — you control the
narrative and let people see what you want them to.
Human brains are
very good at processing information put in a
narrative form, whereas we find it difficult to process abstract concepts and vague ideas.
I think the
narrative would be «of course you sell data» and now we all know across America that you don't sell data, I think that's
very good for you a
very good clarification.
The most expensive and technically ambitious film ever made, James Cameron's long - gestating epic pitting Earthly despoilers against a forest - dwelling alien race delivers unique spectacle, breathtaking sights,
narrative excitement and an overarching anti-imperialist, back - to - nature theme that will play
very well around the world, and yet is rather ironic coming from such a technology - driven picture.
Some of the
best conditions for a meaningful rally are present: significant undervaluation coupled with
very negative sentiment and media
narratives.
So when I told you to stick your platitudes where the sun don't shine, what I was saying was that I reject your shamy concern trolling and refuse to allow you to control this
narrative... like you tried to control MY statement by calling it «silencing» (the
very word we've all been using to accuse TJ's EV crowd...
very clever), and you tried to control JULIE»S story by diminishing it to «
well there are two sides», and how you tried to control this entire conversation by saying what we think about it isn't important or relevant unless we're having face - to - face convos (and yet you're commenting here?
Inasmuch as many have taken in hand to set in order a
narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed
good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the
very first, to write to you an orderly account, most excellent Theophilus, that you may know the certainty of those things in which you were instructed.
Although Muslims and Christians do not share identical scriptures, the traditional Islamic view of the biblical
narrative is nuanced and often
very well informed.
Linafelt attributes to the mutual benefits of the two genres the «
very best of ancient Hebrew
narrative technique: a lengthy, artful and coherent story, with complicated and conflicted characters who grow and change and who... are capable of surprising the reader» (p. 72).
And I assure you that my knowledge of biblical controversies is miniscule, but the one were discussing I have spent some time looking into, it's
very intriguing to me that these things exist alongside each other... as I said earlier, John's gospel is a
good example of historical detail (with respect to the synoptics) seemingly playing second fiddle to a developing
narrative (the Johanine tradition).
I think Jüngel's dual role as theologian and biblical scholar stood him
very well in calling attention to the importance of this insight in the biblical
narrative.
We note in any case, and emphatically, that it is, like so much in the patriarchal
narratives, a
very good story indeed especially in the graphic portrayal of Tamar, in its deft integration of plot, and in its fine suspense.
There's been a
narrative that's starting to be dispelled that the Panthers are the worst 13 - 0 team in the history of the NFL, which is a pretty hilarious thing to say, but the underlying point is that they have some
very real and
well - documented weaknesses that get covered up by Cam Newton on offense, and All - Pro linebacker play on defense.
Although I've found it
very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get
better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral
narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now
A lengthy,
well - researched, and powerful article in the Spring 2015 issue of the NCAA's Champion magazine, not only reports the belief of many top concussion experts that the media
narrative about sports - related concussion trace has been dominated by media reports on the work of Dr. Ann McKee, which was the centerpiece of PBS Frontline's League of Denial, but Dr. McKee's, however belated, mea culpa that «There's no question [that her autopsies finding evidence of CTE in the brains of most of the former athletes were] a
very biased study,» that they involved «a certain level of... sensationalism», that there were «times when it's overblown» and went «a little too far.»
She also recommends a
very late beginning for original writing, building towards it with
narrative, reading quality books, and dictation, all of which she seems to think will naturally promote
good writing.
On the whole, across party, it tends to be
very good as a space for internal party politics (especially party organisation issues like all women shortlists or primaries), for broad political
narrative and argument (what should Labour), personalities and reactive left - right politics around major headline news events, and for some other specific political issues (challenging the far right is a
good example).
The tory message is
very well established, their
narrative on the roots of the crisis, on labour's profligacy and mismanagement, and their habit of tying Ed Balls in with that have been pretty successful, to put it mildly.
Thus far, I haven't heard of a comprehensive
narrative which explains this
very well.
When a major publisher expressed interest in re-releasing Deep Nutrition, that was
very exciting because it gave me an opportunity to put all the science around nutrition that's come out since the original was published into the context of that larger story, to grow the story into an even bigger and
better narrative.
In the end, it's a
very well crafted more of the same, where the change in the setting delivers some interesting landscapes and cultural aspects in the
narrative.
It's a lot of fun to play in the open world and the gameplay mechanics are fantastic, but the story kidnaps you and railroads you into a
very strange
narrative which doesn't really fit all that
well with the rest of the gameplay experience.
Instead it suffers slightly from the need and the hunger for aggressive long - lead marketing (a massive amount of the
narrative is revealed in the trailers), and a comicbook - savvy audience who understand the rules of the genre so
well that it's
very difficult for anything to feel truly surprising or truly in jeopardy.
It won't be long before this movie's late - game success has journos pushing the
narrative that it's a great film year for women, and thanks to Bigelow, it may
very well be.
The Sweet Hereafter is a
very good film that is both emotionally engaging and unique in the way it tells its story through parallel
narratives / time manipulation.
The direction is pedestrian at
best and the
narrative seems
very uneven and confused.
I've had some
very good luck with documentaries thus far but not with
narratives.
After following an uplifting, spirited, feminist
narrative, In a World... finishes on a distinctly feel
good note, with all the main characters, presumably,
very happy — we're not quite sure because the story doesn't close.
Anthony Russo: It's certainly grounded in the
narrative that we have been following throughout the MCU —
very well grounded...
The performances of the young cast are
very natural, and Sloma is perhaps the standout: she is given the opening and closing sequences as
well as at least her share of the interwoven
narrative, but the film couldn't work without her confident portrayal of a young woman on the verge of maturity.
These random acts of strangeness are literred throughout the extremely dark
narrative which eventually takes a turn for the even darker plot - point 50 minutes in which steers the movie into a completely different direction,
very much for the
better.
It's more of a slice of life sort of movie than one with a clear and easy - to - summarize
narrative, but it's essentially a
very good film concentrating on loss of innocence, scattered with moments of greatness usually brought to the surface by its strong technical aspects (from its stylized editing to its sporadic shifts in tone).
And while the subsequent three episodes are still
very good, there are some signs of
narrative loosening.
It's
very fair to point a finger at Chef for being an overdone attempt at sending a personal message and there are
very few surprises in the
narrative, but what's wrong with that when the film works so
well?
«The one thing we've always really admired about Kevin Feige and Marvel is they have a
very, even though they're building an interconnected
narrative through many, many films over many years, they have a
very disciplined one movie at a time attitude, as
well, which I think is
very very helpful to the creative process of fashioning the individual film,» he continued.
Which is the truly maddening part of Kurtzman and Orci and Pinker's work — the individual scenes are frequently
very well thought out, they just do not work together to form a competent
narrative.
IFMCA member James Southall said that War for the Planet of the Apes was «not just the
best film music [Giacchino has] ever written» but that «the manner of the score, the construction of the dramatic
narrative, [and] the
very deliberate emotional prods... make it stand out as a special achievement».
His surprise at winning it was almost as great as mine; Last Ride «s a
good film, but far from a great one, and the downward spiral traced by Hugo Weaving's character in the film is not done justice by a soundtrack that hits an elegiac pitch at the
very outset but never modulates it in concert with the
narrative.
Besides having a
good narrative, the game also had
good graphics,
very smart enemies, and an incredible multiplayer for the time.
Any
narrative momentum is completely absent, so we're left with a movie that looks really
good, but does
very little.
This year, that story
very well may be the Anti-Harvey
Narrative.
Granik, who made her debut in 2004 with the addiction saga Down to the Bone (the titles of her first two features give the amusing impression that she has taken the term «body of work»
very literally), skillfully sustains the atmosphere, climaxing with a viscerally eerie light - of - the - moon boat scene that more resembles the work of the French festival - circuit lightning rod Philippe Grandrieux than a thuddingly
well - intentioned American life - on - the - margins
narrative like Frozen River.
It's more of a «slice of life» sort of movie than one with a clear and easy - to - summarize
narrative, but it's essentially a
very good film concentrating on loss of innocence, scattered with moments of greatness that are usually brought to the surface by its strong technical aspects (from its stylized editing to its sporadic shifts in tone).
She comes across here as a
very unfussy stylist, with a rigorous concentration on her complex but stripped - down
narrative and on the
best way to dole out the specific information we need at any one time, and no more.
Sensing this, Scorsese gives Teddy a closing line that begs for a careful reassessment of all that's come before, but it's way too late by then to consider Shutter Island much more than a bad marriage between one of the
best, most innovative filmmakers in the history of the medium and a
narrative that's the
very definition of mundane.
Meanwhile, Mary J. Blige «s nomination in the same category for the song «Mighty River» from Mudbound currently stands as Netflix's
best chance at winning their
very first Oscar for a
narrative feature.
Linklater is
very aware that his film doesn't have a linear
narrative and the movie is structured with that knowledge, as
well as for a variety in tone and theme.