Sentences with phrase «very good rule»

For attorneys, that is a very good rule of thumb.

A: It is a very good rule of thumb to run any test booster for only 8 - 12 weeks, and to take an 8 - 12 week break after or switch to a supplement that works through a different mechanism of action.

But I might say that I think the 1946 rule was a very good rule.

According to T, leprechauns are not very good rule - followers.

That is a VERY good rule.

According to the judge Justice Edward Ekow Baiden he needed to study the arguments of both prosecution and defence lawyer to able to give a very good ruling.

These are five very good rules, that when followed, will keep you out of debt, but why else should a person have credit cards?

Not exact matches

They should remain something that complements your existing strategy or indeed allows growth, but you should not be reliant upon them as they have the power to change the very rules you live by... They could increase commission or block sellers in your category and even undercut you on your best - selling product.

If not, it might be best to stick with the rules or, at the very least, avoid complimenting Castro in Miami.

Instead, he got down to sharing some concrete and very specific advice for startups as well as some concise rules of thumb he uses to handicap a newbie's success.

You might very well be that exception to the rule.

There may very well be a quid pro quo going on, where Verizon is saying it will salvage the government's desire to have four strong wireless carriers if Ottawa in turn loosens up the broadcasting rules.

Likewise, he has no interest in going public — «We think we're the best stewards of our journey» — and, while he says he'd never categorically rule out selling the company, it's clear the price would have to be very, very right.

Duty of care, good reason triggers, co-employment risk — it's immediately clear these attorneys are very concerned with playing by the rules.

«We are being very cautious interpreting the regulations as well as waiting for the final rulings before making our own determination as to if this is ultimately going to be a good thing or a bad thing for people.»

«We are very pleased that the Supreme Court denied defendants» petition, leaving firmly in place the Second Circuit's precedential rulings regarding the necessity of utilizing event studies to prove market efficiency as well as the burden of proof required to rebut the presumption of reliance, both of which were highly favorable to investors,» the shareholders» attorney Jeremy A. Lieberman of Pomerantz LLP told Law360 on Monday.

For all other sales, the proposal would require licensees to apply a standard very similar to the DOL's «best interests» standard, as well as the ERISA «prudent person» rule.

From next month, holding onto personal data without a very good reason to do so will be far more risky — because GDPR is also backed up with a regime of supersized fines that are intended to make privacy rules much harder to ignore.

«It's good legislation which would give the province the right to regulate hazardous substances, and they have some punitive measures attached if rules were broken, so we're very pleased,» he said.

Donovan points out that many women are very good at following rules, which is why girls consistently outperform boys in school.

«As long as the rules are reasonable, the impact will be very good.»

«The company is in very good shape, and I certainly wouldn't rule out the idea of even better returns next year,» he said.

Roper: If approved as proposed, the delay of the second phase of the DOL rule's implementation could have a very damaging effect on retirement savers, who have been led to expect best interest advice but may not receive it without the full protections of the rule.

Newly appointed head of the Department of Education Betsy DeVos appears very unlikely to pursue further regulation of for - profit colleges, and I think there's a good chance that the gainful employment regulation and the 90/10 rule are both rolled back.

I would rather cultivate a strong intuitive sence of judgment and understand the root of morals from within that to live by a very limited and conflicted set of rules such as in the KUran or Bible and never cultivate a good sense of judjment or a moral sense.

I know, it's very ironic for a lie to protect liars, but «a house divided against itself can not stand», so that's how Satan (who rules the world) is protected by the Church as well.

Yes Christ may well have been the very 1st son born before the earth was made as it now is and yes Christ came to this world to prove to his father that he (Christ Jesus) was who he was by dying and going into his dead body to where his father did reign to show to his father that his very first mission to establish all the ways and means needed to keep the nasty from ever anymore to be but only the ruled over within the confining constraints of all celestial cosmologies everywhere to be so known by God Almighty!

When you strip the conformist requirement, suppression of the individual, arbitrary and anachronistic rules, and ritual observances, it is very easy for a group of otherwise good people to become an unthinking mob.

The rule of law, I think, does not admit very well of the irony of doubt, or any therapeutic gnosticism.

The fact is that when you remove the invented deities who some claim have made rules as to our s e x ual activity, the stigma and guilt and shame drop away and we can get on to the very rewarding job of living and being good to one another.

The First Amendment of the Const itution is very clear as well as rulings from the Supreme Court.

As for the scenario with the 15 year old girl, well, that is the very picture of «minimal grace» and the very sort of thing that would be ruled out by my view of optimal grace.

The corner stone of ALL religions is also the ONLY religious principle that I was taught in the «business ethics» class I took in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to follow the «the golden rule» (i.e. due unto others as you would have them do unto you) in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION OF ANY KIND.

It's interesting to think about morals and how we are such moral creatures.There are very few conversations, especially when the subject is about a particular behavior in ourselves or others, that don't involve a value judgement.We're even willing to bend the rules as to what is right / wrong... sometimes stealing and lying can be good things....

I will continue to not steal, not kill, respect other people, and live by the golden rule... and I wlll sleep very well at night without your official blessings.

Another preacher preaching what ever goes is ok with Christianity... If your going to preach Christianity based on the Bible, then you might as well forget gay marriages are ok... If you want to twist it around then thats up to you... Paul said, «The Berens were of noble charachter because they didn't believe what they heard, but they took what they heard and confirmed it with the Bible... So its like the Yen or Yang... Its either Gods church or Satans Church... Can't be any other way... Do I hate gays, no... I have some very close friends that I have had for over 30 years that are gay, but I think they will be accountable for their life styles... Thats the thing about Christianity, we are held accountable, its not an everything goes belief... Its rules we have to follow... And rules we will be held accountable... So maybe this preacher needs to start a dfferent faith or religion... One where there are no rules and where its people are not accountable for their actions...

This is not a rule... it's an INTERPRETATION of a rule that could very well be wrong.

very well put, no one can know, anything is possible, applying rules and ideas to such a thought is pointless.

In such a world the validity of prayer may very well be granted, although magical notions about prayer's working must certainly be ruled out.

It stood before us; as much as we would let it, as a teacher and guide and as a reminder and rule, indicating when our lives together were at their very best and where they needed to change and improve.

All these comments go to show that we are very far away from what is suppose to SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE... all you religious zealots get a clue... if your god is so powerful why doesn't he put your man in office... I'll tell you... he could care less about the piddly human contest to rule the world... really, please, use some logic in determination of who is best for this country...

So while a nondescript god may not be ruled out completely, one that has specific traits may very well.

Finally, observe the two remarkable passages, 9:2 - 7 and 11:1 - 9 (which very well may be Isaianic, despite considerable adverse critical judgment), looking forward to the ultimate fulfillment of the David - Zion covenant (for Isaiah, the covenant) in a Messiah, an «anointed one,» in and through whose rule «the zeal of Yahweh of hosts» (9:7) will effect justice and righteousness (in the theologically dependent sense) not only in Israel but in all the earth (11:4 - 9).

I only break that rule in countries where the coffee is very good, in Italy of course, but also in Japan because I love their milk coffee.

This book rules and I'm not just saying that because she's been very good to me.

It looks like Danny Welbeck is ruled out so maybe the boss wants to keep one striking option on the bench but if he is struggling to decide between the two very different players, would it not be better to start both of them, with Walcott on the right, Giroud in the middle and Alexis on the left?

I cant imagine he will leave for the same type of money that they bought him for as with ffp rules and his scoring these days being very good for a winger but not so much for main striker and also people will be looking at Falcaos case.

Ozil is a play maker in arsenal, as far as arsenal type of playbis concern, Ozil can't be ruled out please, Yes I like Sanchez, he is a very good player, a husttling type, so to speak, but if he insust, I think he can go.

this do nt rule out a new defender... and for the dm issue we have chambers, he has played very well and his best position is dm, in defence we have debuchy and bellerin and the pair koscielny and mertesacker on the middle, where will chambers have game time if not as a dm?

Chelsea have brought in some very good additions and have clearly funded such deals with sales of those Mourinho didn't rate (Luiz and Lukaku) so don't rule out another signing or two before the summer's out.