Sentences with phrase «very good starting point»

The position also offers a very good starting point if you want to build a career in other industries.

After using it for a couple of weeks, the Google Home Mini seems like a very good starting point for a smart speaker.

The range of incidents covered by these three insurance types make them a very good starting point for a «full» coverage package; however, the security of your auto insurance depends on many factors, including your policy limits and the deductible amounts you decide on.

While the aim of providing genuine fairness for cohabiting couples is laudable, in my view, a very good starting point would be simple legislation providing long term cohabitants and those who have children with equality of division of any home acquired for joint use in a family relationship.

So obviously a website's going to be a very good starting point.

And an aggregation of those suggestions can be a very good starting point for the next assessment.

For casual gamers, or those looking for something more «modern», I think Ys VIII is a very good starting point as it doesn't share a lot of lore that's heavily connected in the earlier games.

This blog post is a very good starting point for anyone who wants to get into travel blogging.

So if you're going to go active, looking at lower - cost active relative to a higher - cost active counterpart is a very, very good starting point to do that.

While this rule is never absolute, and it is possible to find many examples of good essay writing when there is more than one idea per paragraph, the «one paragraph, one idea» rule is a very good starting point.

Forgot to say, the price I think is a very good starting point.

Powered by an economical 1.5 - liter engine and a 4 - speed automatic, the 2015 Yaris SE starts at $ 17,620, which is a very good starting point for a nicely - equipped commuter car.

These jumping weights are a very good starting point for investigating the role of athletics in Greek society and the similarities and differences between ancient and modern athletic competitions.

Not exact matches

But at very least, it seems to me that a rough assessment of the economic impact of a vacation is a pretty good starting point.

You start to build up those data points and you can very accurately say «Well, I don't know this person's party political affiliation, but I do know they have a Barber and a Land Rover and a dog and they like shooting and work in merchant banking, therefore, they're likely to be a Tory.

Well, bearing in mind that we start our analysis with a projection that Canada's economic potential is likely to grow by only around 1.5 per cent, which is not very inspiring, we need to take every decimal point of potential growth more seriously than we have in the past.

Very often, an unplanned pregnancy is not the best starting point to raising a child.

Id add my own: If a god, any god, Christian,,, doesn't matter created the whole works, why is this Power very regional... with our «immortal souls» at risk — you would think that this God would have had a better press corp, a better travel agency... to the point that he could have gone gobal from the start.

is a good starting point for a conversation with anyone, including those of very conservative bent.

The starting - point, though gone beyond, can very well be an indication of the goal of the advance, and of how far the latter directly.

And, if I'm to be honest, at this point of my reflections my tolerance wears very thin indeed: in a world of mass murder and mass starvation, of unprecedented terror, odious tyrannies, and the threat of nuclear holocausts — in such a world there is something obscene about an order of priorities that starts off with bigger and better orgasms.

These would be a good starting point if you are new to making sushi as they really are very easy with pretty standard flavours.

For its part, Estrella Damm brewery's Xavier Sitgas calls the study «very good starting material for looking into the gluten analysis from a different point of view.»

He said that we started better, had more of the ball, that we were a very good Arsenal and crucially, for me, was that Mourinho identified that the first goal was the turning point.

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

In all honesty Arsenal played well we had very good position with loads of chances and 13 corner kicks how come we are so crappy at scoring corners???? We need to start scoring the chances we get from corners we could have easily beat southhampton by 4 goals but forster was good he got the 3 points off us MR wenger should go back to the drawing board as he has some options one of witch could the calling of welington silva or a reshuffle bring iwobi in elneny or new methods in tactics as in picking players and rehearse attacks strategy As for the referee I to felt done by him there was on particular foul on sanches that was not giving at the end we need to register our efforts and be clinical

There's been a narrative that's starting to be dispelled that the Panthers are the worst 13 - 0 team in the history of the NFL, which is a pretty hilarious thing to say, but the underlying point is that they have some very real and well - documented weaknesses that get covered up by Cam Newton on offense, and All - Pro linebacker play on defense.

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

The Gunners are nine points behind Mourinho's men after a tough start to the season, but just as our injury crisis is easing off and we are going into a nice looking run of fixtures, losing Costa would be a real blow and they face an away trip to a Crystal Palace side that had a good win in their last game and who Neil Warnock will have very well organised.

Even when Sanogo doesn't score he is better, we start defending from up top when he is on and attack is more fluid; I know ppl will point to d palace game but they sat very deep not affording him any space and Giroud wasn't exactly better when he came on.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Its all very well stating that there are positives and «do nt worry» ect ect but if this is the state of play at the START of the season then how will things be in mid december when its the hardest point in the season and titles are won or lost??

I am looking forward to seeing the youngsters and others getting a game, and I am sure everyone will be playing at some point, but who would you pick as your very best starting line - up?

It's very, very hard to win the PL, but Chelsea did not have the best start in history of the league for instance, at this stage man city did not have the same quantity of points as last season, I believe they had 2 points less, and they crowned themselves champions.

If City lose the derby — and at this point we must remind ourselves that while form points towards United, City still have some very good players and Tony Valencia will start at right back — then Liverpool and Tottenham, level in fifth and sixth, will have an opportunity to cut the gap to four points with six games to go.

I am slowly starting to resign to the point that the commentator made in extra team - «Arsenal is Arsenal - very good to watch but also very easy to play against.

Someone i read earlier pointed out that why is only now that our team has grown up why hasnt this happened three to four years ago when we had a very good starting eleven also.

With Arsenal desperately needing some kind of confidence boost as well as all three Premier League points from this evening's away game at Middlesborough, Arsene Wenger will have been very relieved to welcome our best centre back Laurent Koscielny and the first choice keeper Petr Cech back into training this week, and it is no surprise that both are in the starting line - up tonight.

Arsene Wenger made an illusion about the temperature that water boils at and compared it to the almost very good performances that Arsenal had been putting in at the start of the season, suggesting that the Gunners just needed a few extra degrees of temperature before we hit our own boiling point.

So here's part three of the answer to that very good question, and the starting point is something I heard John Madden say long ago when he was coaching the Raiders: «I only have three rules,» he said.

Just hope wenger starts him Campbell and elmeny... Despite their position need our strongest side out... 3 points from last 9 would be a very poor haul for an aspiring champion... Would leave us 3 above spurs who are way better than people on this sight want to credit and still only 8 points above one of the most haplessly managed man utd sides in a long time....

If we can now carry on from this and start picking up plenty of points on the road to add to the very good home record then an assault on the league summit is possible.

Been a very good week for us, starting with the win over Citeh, ending with the rentboys dropping 2 points yesterday.

For starters, in the PB Book of Coaching Ideals, his starting point is, overall, less than ideal.1 And specifically, its various manifestations have cost Texas in the win column at times - in particular, as HornBrain notes, against the very best competition.

This season has seen Crystal Palace's best ever start to a Premier League season, earning nineteen points from their first thirteen games and sit in a very respectable 10th place.

One other point from the above article is definitely worth mentioning here: the Champions in the Premier League for the previous seven seasons averaged 66 % on this front (though Leicester went onto win the title with only 56 %, putting a slight dent in this), so Klopp's team have started 2016/17 very well indeed.

To conclude, Klopp need not surrender his philosophies to accommodate Liverpool's best players into one starting XI, he only needs to put them in positions they are fairly comfortable with, and that way the team as a unit can succeed; with Benteke as the focal point of the attack, but Sturridge and Firmino also expected to chip in with a decent goal contribution, whilst Coutinho, Henderson (when fit) and Firmino can all provide a creative aspect to outweigh any creative spark lost by not having Coutinho at the very middle of the attacking midfielders.

After a very topsy - turvy 2014 year that had the lowest of lows at some points with a few select very good moments and a year which did end well, Spurs will be aiming to start 2015 the best way possible as they host Premier League leaders Chelsea.

@Medeski; i must say you made some very good points and i do like the lineup, but if i remember correctly Arsene said Kolo doesn't have the «engine» to play DM!Which i personally think is a pity!I doubt Arshavin will start the match, but hopefully the boys starting will do a good job (read 2,3 goals to the good), so he can come in say after 60 - 65 mins.

after being in this kind of relationship for all this years you start to question everything about yourself you think you must be too fat or too ugly for a few years I thought what was the point in leaving him if my own husband doesn't want who else is going to want me I must of had the conversation about how our situation was affecting me over 1000 times when he did bother to come near me like once every 5 - 8 months he'd say it wasn't enjoyable for him because I was very awkward but he never understood the reason I was uncomfortable how are you supposed to feel good about yourself when you know your husband would rather look at other women online