Not exact matches
The
very small rock was speaking to humanity and I am
human, so I used the
words «we» and «our» in the previous post in a reference to me and all other
humans.
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early
humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods
word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the
very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
There's Arkansas, bounty hunters, snakes real,
human, and symbolic, being rescued from a snake pit by a
very errant knight, a display of the gratuitous slaughter that comes when you take the law in your own hands, a deep commentary on place, displacement, the state of nature, and the techno - forces of the modern world and modern government, solidly American thoughts on law, property, justice, and keeping your
word, and so forth and so on.
In your
very own
words you support that which christians believe, that being
humans are broken.
Sometimes the
words of the sacred text are thought to be the
very words of God himself, ipsissima verba, the
human element in the situation being merely instrumental.
The argument of this sermon was open to criticism on the ground that the preacher seemed to take for granted a highly debatable view of the redemptive value of
human suffering; yet he was calling attention to something
very important, namely, that if we quote Baxter's
words as Professor Lampe has done, we must not forget that the scope of Christ's suffering is limited.
If it is true, as Holloway argues, that the
very foundations of matter and the identity of
human nature are aligned upon the coming of the
Word made flesh, then a society which is uncertain about the existence of God and whether Man has any meaning or purpose must be subject to crisis, alienation and chaos even more inevitably than CiV is able to show.
If we recall Kitchner's hortatory
words spoken just five minutes before, we can go to our dreams knowing that this is what our
very own culture does better than any other — it defines the ultimate
human quest.
The beauty of the inspired
Word is that none of the characters except one is
very human and susceptible to poor choices.
The answer is that theology is a
very human, and
very important, enterprise; that grasping and assimilating what God has done and continues to do is not something that can be engaged in passively but is a challenge to everything any of us possesses; that the separation of theologizing from what the minister and the church try, fallibly but authentically, to hear of the
Word of God in specific situations from some alleged and remote theology is bound to be blasphemous as well as mistaken; and that the one way to hear the
Word of God, if it contains the Protestant principle, is to submit our functions to concrete self - criticism.
So the
very deepest insights about
human existence that came to her, Israel described as the
Word of YHWH.
(For instance, on the
very day on which I write this page, the post brings me some aphorisms from a worldly-wise old friend in Heidelberg which may serve as a good contemporaneous expression of Epicureanism: «By the
word «happiness» every
human being understands something different.
In fairness to Girard, I must say that he realizes
very clearly that the key to the whole problem is found in the Prologue of John, but he writes in the genre of sociological theory rather than the genre of theology, which prevents him from speaking as freely as he might of the Incarnation of the
Word of God in
human history.
We may prepare for our next section, then, by affirming that, for Christian faith, by the prevenient Action of God a
human life was taken and made into the instrument for the gracious divine operation; in more traditional idiom, the eternal
Word, Self - Expression of
very God, was clothed with a true humanity, crowning the rest of God's work in and for God's
human children.
Though the
Word breaks out into the daylight of consciousness only with the birth of persons and
human history, faith allows us to discern a great promise even in the
very earliest moments of the cosmic adventure.
Brunner's alternative is that we should recognize that in the Bible we have God's
Word in a
very human medium.
The
words are at best a
very rough translation and they convey a sense which is in tension with Church Tradition concerning the uniquely spiritual (non-physical)
human soul.
In the
words of an ancient prayer, it is the visible expression of «that wonderful and sacred mystery» which speaks to us and works on us, through the
very imperfection, weakness, error, and even the sin of the empirical institution, to manifest in the world of time and space the abiding reality of God's operation in the event of Christ for
human wholeness.
This «outfront» role, enacted «before the congregation,» is of course
very public: administering the sacraments, preaching the
word, and being of service to other
human beings within and without the congregation.
(shamar)(Gen 2:15) A lot has been written on the implications of that verse and the meanings of those Hebrew
words, but one of the amazing things to me is the fact that from the
very beginning God was involving
humans in what he was doing in the world.
Kennedy's judgment was a far cry from the
words of the great legal scholar William Blackstone, who referred to sodomy in his magisterial Commentaries (1769) as «an offence so dark in nature, the
very mention of which is a disgrace to
human nature, a crime not fit to be named.»
All natural entities are seen as subjects with some degree of self - determination or freedom and with some degree of sentience or feeling, though the meaning of these
words is
very different at the level of the
human as compared to that of a DNA molecule or an electron.
The real substance of this Commandment, the whole area of perjury, the truth, the integrity, the validity of one's
word — that is important, for the
very matrix of society is built upon the assumption that a man's
word is good and truth can be expected in
human interchange.
That doesn't seem to be
very God like from my perspective, but more on the lines of protecting the
human ego of those that wrote the original
words.
And the sermon — which we may hope will be no series of moral platitudes or pious phrases, but a real proclamation of the gospel of God in Christ — can be for us, as it is meant always to be, the
very Word of God brought to bear upon our
human lives.
If the Christ of Israel was in
very fact the
Word who is God in Person, then we must be able to show the continuity in this Church of the life, the action, the authority of
very God, ever living to make intercession for us, ever operating with divine efficacy, ever teaching with divine infallibility: otherwise the Incarnation is an irrelevance of
human history.
However, in other places Balthasar used «hope» in a
very different, much stronger sense, akin to theological hope; in these instances the
word was used to denote a supernatural reality which assures us that, even if
human beings appear to reject God, he will nevertheless find a way to save them in the end (even in Hell).
These are Gods
very own
words to the whole
human race for all time.
To our ears such
words sound
very like the most blatant
human imperialism toward the rest of nature, as does the divine commission to man in Genesis 1:28; and in modern times they may have fostered such an attitude and been used as a divine «exploiters» charter» to justify it.
It reflects an intensely bitter hatred for the Amalekites, a
human kind of hatred which is imputed to God (17:14), so that it is the
very Word which speaks the fierce judgment of annihilation upon Amalek.
He moved from believing that the Bible is the inerrant
word of God to seeing it as «a
very human book.»
The
human race, in other
words, is possibly
very early in its development and is by no means clearly the climax of cosmic emergence.
The Jesus mania of the crowd is juxtaposed with the
very human, even pathetic self - understanding of Jesus: «There is not a man among you who knows or cares if I come or go,» and the poignant rephrasing of the
words of institution, «For all you care this wine could be my blood; / For all you care this bread could be my body.»
IN PLURIMIS (On the Abolition of Slavery) Pope Leo XIII Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on 5 May 1888 The
words of St. Gregory the Great are
very applicable here: «Since our Redeemer, the Author of all life, deigned to take
human flesh, that by the power of His Godhood the chains by which we were held in bondage being broken, He might restore us to our first state of liberty, it is most fitting that men by the concession of manumission should restore to the freedom in which they were born those whom nature sent free into the world, but who have been condemned to the yoke of slavery by the law of nations.»
In today's
human rights discourse, people use the same
words but mean
very different things.
Just by reading your
words one can tell you are a
very beautiful
human being full of love and I think some of us out there are looking also to make what we love without constraints and at the same time being true to oneself.
The only way to reach a
human is to confuse the hell out of the telephone robots, by speaking
very quickly and saying
words in a random order.
This message is the most important one because it counterbalances those
very human moments when I am not the most patient mom, they know how I really feel so that when I apologise for being angry or disappointing them or for making
very human mistakes they believe it because they have seen through my
words and most of my actions that I mean it.
So Mr. President must be told in
very clear
words that there is no option to respecting the civil liberties and fundamental
human rights of Nigerians.»
In other
words, antibiotic resistance coming from Africa or Saudi Arabia is still a
very minor threat compared to that caused and spread by
human activity, especially animal husbandry.
Killer whales can (sort of) imitate
human words and other
very unwhalelike sounds, says a tough test of mimicry.
«We think of
words as being unique to
humans but, in fact, dogs can process the meaning and tone of
words — and they do it in a
very similar way to
humans,» says lead researcher Atilla Andics, a neuroscientist at Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest.
Another thing
humans can do
very well but machines can not is find the edges of
words.
The
word «Cardio» actually comes from the ancient Greek
word «Kardia» which meant «Heart» so naturally, as you may expect, cardiovascular exercise and activity is
very beneficial for the
human heart, which is, without question, one of the most vital organs in our bodies.
Human brain cloud is a
very simple massively multiplayer
word association game.
i have to say personal experience i love the game graphic wise it is an astonishing game i liked how the game is compost of 40 % movie cinemas that are gorgeous and 60 % actual game i like this game mode fixes my needs and play style why the cinema is running i get to enjoy my beer and watch and mind blowing graphical short clip i cant ask for more i do have to get real when it come to the game play normal mode is so simple the AI of the robots and
human is
very poor, when you turn it up to
very hard get a bit better make the game play better, when it comes to open
word it feels really liked Far Cry Primal a game that i expend liked 200 + hrs for that main reason i may feel some repetition to this game but overall the graphics makes me keep my mind off of it.
Read all the books you like, but
words can not adequately describe the mix of joy and terror you feel when a doctor says congratulations and hands over your
very own tiny
human being.
«When I was a child, it was impossible for a man ever to walk on the moon, impossible to cut out a
human heart and put it in another man's chest... the
word «impossible» has proven to be a
very stupid
word!»
Now, unless two
very smart
humans are being stupid beyond
words, I am going to assume they are not doing what I (and others I have talked to) fear, so now to the meat of what they did release.
but it's pretty good at catching mechanical things, like repeating phrases, excessive adverbs, filler
words,... Take its recommendations with a grain of salt, but it could be
very helpful in cleaning up copy before a
human editor gets to see it, so (s) he can focus on the meat and potatoes rather than on petty annoyances.