Not exact matches
, but they have only
very hazy
ideas about what the
Church really says on human dignity, the value
of each one
of us, the beauty
of human love, the value
of authentic family life, the mutual companionship
of men and women.
Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims
very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations
of the
churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions /
ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.
When the American Revolution was completed, not only had the Established
Church of England been rejected, but, more important, the
very idea of Establishment had been discarded in principle by the new Constitution.
There a plenty
of non-trinitarian Christian denominations like the Christadelphians, Christian Scientists, Dawn Bible Students, Friends General Conference, Iglesia ni Cristo, Members
Church of God International, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, La Luz del Mundo, Living
Church of God, Oneness Pentecostals, Unitarian Universalist Christians and the United
Church of God... The
very idea of the Trinity didn't become Christian dogma until some 300 years after Christ's death, and even then it was quite a debate at the Council
of Nicea...
When, for example, at first in the 19th century down to Pius XII the
Church adopted a
very reserved attitude to any inclusion
of the human bios in the
idea of evolution, that was motivated, and rightly so, by a fundamental conception
of the nature
of man which for good reasons required to be defended.
I am convinced that most
of us Christians and many
of our
churches have a
very skewed
idea of who Jesus was, so while we think we are living like Jesus, we may actually be living like Judas.
In the 17th century, the
ideas of the Reformation were spreading throughout the world and the
Church did not accept
very graciously the new scientific
ideas that mixed themselves with God and religion.
Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend
church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the
idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because
of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part
of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another
church i attend multiple
churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a
very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz
The Pastor
of the last Pentecostal
church I attended had a
very reasonable
idea: It's okay to drink, but getting drunk is a sin.
In the first place, the leaders
of the
church have been induced to listen
very closely to the social scientists and sociologists, and thus they have adopted programs and
ideas of social planning which, worthy as they may be, can often be recognized only with difficulty as the real concern
of the
church.
But the
very nature
of the division
of spiritual formation
of Christians between lay leaders in the Sunday School and pastoral leaders in the
church leaves people with the
idea that Christian faith can be learned by attending classes.
There can, they profoundly believe, be no survival without collaboration: and the
idea that if we are to thrive in a predominantly secular culture we should informally come to a kind
of concordat with it, rather on the model
of the Anglican Establishment, has become
very powerful in the English Catholic
Church.
Didn't read the article, so I have no
idea how President Obama's faith has been labeled, but as a person who began attending a Christina
Church during adolescence, I know that it is
very hard to accept a number
of tenets
of the faith, so I find myself doubting that a person who was raised for a number
of years in a Muslim household and whose mother does not appear to have been
of a Christian denomination, is likely to have adopted the tenets
of the Christian faith.
I believe a lot
of questionable doctrinal
ideas also slipped in — with
very little scriptural open - ness on the questions — you accept the doctrines or you leave the
church.
For many in our group
of friends, whose homes were broken or filled with abuse and sadness, who had not grown up in the
Church, the
very idea of a loving Father was an absurdity.
The
churches I grew up in had and taught
very strict and well - defined
ideas of what a man and a woman was and should be, and what a biblical man and a biblical woman should be.
So, we ought not abandon such an
idea because some have taken it to its illogical conclusion — and we should be
very careful
of saying that uses
of the word «missional» today are endorsing the
ideas that led to such deep missiological problems in the World Council
of Churches.
«I suppose that's always interested me, the
idea of people in the same side
of the political spectrum who have
very different
ideas about what the movement should be doing, what the party should be doing, and this
idea of a broad
church with everybody welcome.
Blasphemy laws are, by their
very design, contrary to the
idea of secularism — the separation
of church and religion from the state and laws which govern people.