Sentences with phrase «very idea of climate change»

Of course, those opposed to the very idea of climate change science are jumping all over these comments as proof of «crazy global warming zealots».

Notice, also, that Mitrovica equates Smith's statement that she is watching the debate to a rejection of the very idea of climate change.

Not exact matches

«Tomorrowland» is singularly unafraid of weighty concepts, tackling climate change, our ongoing fascination with the apocalypse and the very Disney - ish idea of being «special».

How I reason is, «if even I can think of basic information that casts doubt on the idea of man - made climate change, then either the data for the idea is not very strong, or the scientists reporting it are not making a very articulate argument.

This idea of «two climate changes» is a very useful heuristic.

Although there is no evidence that manmade CO2 emissions play any detectable role in climate change, the very idea that Mother Nature may cool the planet despite humanityâ $ ™ s furious output of greenhouse gases should be even worse for the climate alarmistsâ $ ™ way of thinking.

Climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically selected factor (CO2) is as misguided as it gets.Climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically selected factor (CO2) is as misguided as it gets.climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically selected factor (CO2) is as misguided as it gets.»

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change — agreed in Rio in 1992 and ratified by 195 countries, including the United States — was premised from its very first words on the idea that «change in the earth's climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind.Climate Change — agreed in Rio in 1992 and ratified by 195 countries, including the United States — was premised from its very first words on the idea that «change in the earth's climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind.&Change — agreed in Rio in 1992 and ratified by 195 countries, including the United States — was premised from its very first words on the idea that «change in the earth's climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind.&change in the earth's climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind.climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind.»

The idea that the science of climate change is «settled» is an absurdity, contrary to the very spirit of scientific enquiry.

In fact that there is wide spread cross-cultural acceptance of the idea that one should not engage in very risky behavior that could cause great harm to things which people attach great value to is a conclusion that is clear from the acceptance of the «precautionary principle» in a growing number of international treaties including the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN, 1992, Article 3).

I have a very short piece over at the Institute of Ideas (IOI) website, outlining the reasons for repealing the Climate Change Act.

The main obstacles to meeting the challenge of a changing climate are the policymakers» lack of imagination and commitment to the very idea of progress.

This conference will bring together representatives of local government, state agencies and concerned citizens to shares ideas on how to address very real issues, such as increased flooding and sea level rise, and safeguard our state from future climate change.

Instead of recognising climate change as a problem which has clear and wide - ranging Individualist solutions, the very idea that thee could be a problem at all is being denied.

It is Leif Svalgaard's contribution that has led me away from the idea that TSI changes have a major effect except on very long timescales of maybe 100,000 years or so and even then the internal system checks and balances seem to adjust enough to prevent a direct climate impact from TSI changes alone.

What with national newspapers talking about survivalism and community resillience, and radio soaps joining the Transition Towns initiative, it really seems like the mainstream media in the UK are embracing the idea that peak oil, fossil fuels and climate change are very real, and very immediate, threats to our way of life.

As Media Matters is pointing out, Matt Drudge (as well as plenty of other media outlets) seems to have not gotten that memo: It May Not Be Unanimous... But It's Pretty Close Despite conclusions by the IPCC that global climate change is actually occurring and humans are very likely the cause of it, somehow the idea has entered the mainstream media that every time it snows it's further evidence that those kooky, socialist, hair - shirt - wearing environmentalists have gotten it all wrong.

Any substantial revision to the carbon budget would have major implications, changing our ideas of how rapidly countries will need to ratchet down their greenhouse gas emissions in coming years and, thus, the very workings of global climate policymaking.

First of all, I don't have any symphaty for them to call the U.S. for help, they know what they in for and it's very stupid to go to a communist country and risk your freedom and family life for a story that people know what is going on, AL GORE HAVE NO BALLS to support his current workers for the life - threatening jobs, HE DOESN» T HAVE ANY IDEA IN CLIMATE CHANGES, I don't know who is his ADVISOR is but all they want is your sympathy and MONEY, to this TWO JOURNALIST who is asking for forgiveness and admitting the stupid action that they did, hope will end in happy ending i'm just saying this because of your family especially your kids.