This just goes to show that constructing a real portfolio and a hypothetical portfolio are very different things, especially when dealing with
very illiquid securities like I do.
Pretty limited investment set in general, but especially so today with only a couple
very illiquid securities I am trying to buy.
Private equity funds are also
very illiquid, and are therefore only viable for investors who can afford to tie up large amounts of money for extended periods of time.
-- Shares could be
very illiquid, with far less information flow — you may see little trading, and brokers will have little incentive to support a market in shares.
The big advantage with MM is that they will provide a market even when the underlying is
very illiquid and only might have a few trades each day.
So if a stock for example has last sale price of $ 0.50, has a highest bid price of $ 0.40 and a lowest offer price of $ 0.60, and an average daily volume of 10000 share, it is likely to be
very illiquid.
The first is that the market for municipal bonds is
very illiquid.
There are various reasons why an ETF might not be able to replicate an index perfectly, for example it might be too costly to correctly replicate
very illiquid securities that are part of an index.
Interesting and sometimes compelling idea that may be
very illiquid, may be a probability bet with a favourable asymmetrical reward to risk ratio, or may simply be a low quality business that is very cheap relative on a net - net working capital or price / tangible book value basis.
A small business or rental property is
very illiquid.
Because the over-the-counter bond market can be
very illiquid.
Those ranged from moderately liquid to
very illiquid.
Real estate and small businesses are
very illiquid; months may pass between the owner's decision to sell and his or her receipt of cash for the property or business.
Also, keep in mind that trading penny stocks means dealing with assets that can be
very illiquid.
But some rich people make the mistake of tying the bulk of their assets up in one place, such as their own business or in real estate — two
very illiquid investments.
The first thing is that it is
a very illiquid investment, so it has to be an investor with a long time frame.
Not exact matches
Ten years ago, if you look at emerging market bonds, corporates, that was a
very small and
illiquid market.
Specifically, a sudden expansion of financial liquidity in the world's leading banking centers — whether an increase in British gold reserves in the 1820s or the massive transformation in the 1980s of
illiquid mortgage loans into
very liquid mortgage securities, or some other structural change in the financial markets — has been the catalyst behind every period of globalization.
In the quest to compensate for low fixed income returns, pension funds have plowed money into stocks, private equity funds and
illiquid and
very risky investments, like subprime auto loan securities and commercial real estate.
In some ways, my rookie errors with small cap stocks helped me become a
very good
illiquid bond trader.
The OFR looked at leverage levels, risk modeling and quantity of
illiquid assets to reach its «
very tentative» conclusion.
In some ways, my rookie errors with small cap stocks helped me become a
very good
illiquid bond trader.
The problem with being an investor in net net stocks is that they are
very small and
illiquid.
CYB is
illiquid, so your comment about it being «hit» applied to a
very few number of shares.
You might also find that insolvency becomes a
very personal matter, as prior capital providers who know the business better than others, are invited to «prepackaged reorganizations» when the business is
illiquid or insolvent.
If I own one - third of Florida, that's an extremely
illiquid asset and exactly how much of it I can develop at what value, the name escapes me, but the company I'm thinking about ended up being a
very good short thesis by David Einhorn.
If using a market order - yes you will buy or sell, but in an
illiquid stock with a large spread you will get a
very bad price for it, likely more than 10 % away from the last traded price.
Mr. Cotter controls Reading through the
very small
illiquid Class B voting shares, but also has a much larger shareholding and economic stake in the more liquid RDI nonvoting shares, which are the same share class we now hold in size.
But it's not a
very good scalable strategy as they are small,
illiquid and not always prevalent.
Busts are
very infrequent, and if an equity were
illiquid enough to be affected, the bust cost would be enormous.
Taking on
illiquid investments is a bet the the future will be
very good; there will be no reason to liquidate funds.
12 % return, less 2 % fees, followed by taxes as ordinary income suddenly become a
very ordinary 6 %, and a pretty
illiquid investment at that.