Sentences with phrase «very language used»

Third, the very language used in schools, such as «team teaching,» imply that only teachers who share a classroom are a team — everyone else is autonomous.

Christ came among men with a simple ministry of teaching whose main purpose was to confirm that the kinds of ways in which God had been understood in Natural religion, and the very language used to express those insights, were broadly right.

Getting it right is more than just a tech fix, success extends to the very language you use.

Today women are challenging understandings of the right to life, our definitions of priestly authority and the nature of the church, and even the very language we use to share our faith.

Not only has it changed football — for good and ill — but it's altered the very language we use.

I know because I co-authored a book about it — the adverts, the TV programmes, the toy promotions, even the very language we use and the way we interact with our own children differs depending on their gender.

Everything about Teach for America is being subjected to internal debate, from the length of the five - week training and two - year placements to the very language it uses to describe its mission and impact.

Not exact matches

He was very careful in the language he used when he spoke.

Say you speak another language (which does not use the standard Roman alphabet), but you can't write it very well.

The use of sexist language in the public sphere is poised to become a very big — and long overdue — issue in coming months.

«It's very important to use very clear compelling language that leads with your customer's best interest,» Gill says.

It's very easy to fail in VR if you use the old language.

Use language like: «In addition to being very busy, is there any other reason?»

«Xi Jinping has used very strong language in favor of globalization, in favor of freer trade.

Supporting both iOS and Android platforms, the platform is very similar to the web - based testing that Rainforest does, letting you set direct tasks and workflows using natural language testing to direct an available 24/7 group of testers to make sure things do what they're meant to.

In one part of the deposition, White uses language we are familiar hearing from politicians, characterizing Berger as «a very aggressive enforcement lawyer.»

Apple has a very in - depth privacy page that uses plain language to tell visitors how the company uses data.

I've started to use your ideas, themes and language within professional development sessions for leaders in schools and social services in our quiet corner of very rural England.

Tell Me What to Do: In Pure Barre, you become a «trained listener» for instructions: «lift your leg, turn out to open your hip, tuck your hips under...» It is so helpful when teachers use the same familiar language in very specific ways to direct what they want.

But Facebook claims it can already process 10,000 posts every second in 20 different languages using Deep Text, and it's starting to deploy the technology to its user base, albeit for a very small number of use cases.

Second, it is very easy for a vendor to claim, «We use natural language processing», and you will never know whether it really works, or is better than another vendor's NLP.

And I wrote with using a very simple plain language because a personal pet peeve of mine is that finances intentionally kept kind of opaque and confusing because I think it's meant to keep most people ignorant of how the system actually works.

Plan providers don't make this easy by providing fee disclosures that are 15 to 45 pages long and use very opaque language in how this information is relayed.

I am kind of with Wzrd1 on this, even if you don't know he difference between hebrew and arabic (pretty different languages, but not everyone can tell) orthodox jews dress in a very specific and unique way, not anything traditional arabic garb or the western clothing that we wear and most terrorists use to blend in on planes etc..

God using evolution to create shows way more time and dedication to the emergence of humans, but of course the fundamentalists know best and claim to KNOW that genesis was meant to be 100 % literal despite gaps and missing pieces translating from a very simplistic language into English.

it is very obvious who the people are who have the problems by their use of a very basic style of language that normal healthy people don't use.

I would even say that «goal - setting and vision - casting language» can be a very positive thing — until somebody uses it as a weapon to beat others over the head with.

Your comments are very uninformed and your poor use of language makes it even more obvious.

Should not the very language of their dismissiveness give these defenders pause for asking whether, if it is the conservatives who are unhappy, it may be because the liberals are getting their way in using the ecclesiastical machinery to promote their ends?

So either you you're claiming that the very first bible created an uproar, or you misspoke on using Latin to describe the original language.

The language we use of «encounter» is very deliberately chosen, because in an encounter there's no pressure, but you are offering something.»

(I apologize to those that dislike metaphors, but I almost can't communicate if I don't get to use them, and as insufficient as they at times are, they are very close to the language of what I believe, because you can't really explain or define someone into believing... you can only live out your beliefs in a way that you share with others, and when given the opportunity shine a light, or point a direction, or walk along with someone for a bit).

In my everyday use of language, neither I nor my hearer posit the meaning of what I say in a very explicit way.

At times the two seem to speak separate languages — perhaps most strikingly when they use the very same words.

The communicative enterprise would become a vast inductive project — a complex exercise in theory - building, leading tentatively and provisionally toward something which, in fact, the imputational groundwork of our language enables us to presuppose from the very outset.1 Only by using the resources of thought to free our communicative resources from the spatio - temporal processes of their employment can we manage to communicate with one another across the reaches of space and time.

This would be unsettling enough if language were simply a tool we use rather than the very medium in which we live.

«They are using very emotive language and it doesn't help us have a calm conversation about assisted dying.

The use of biblical language to express a Victorian worldview makes it very difficult for most Protestants to remember that the books of the Bible address questions posed in another time in terms of the worldviews of ancient cultures.

Suddenly a word came into my mind Cuumara it kept repeating itself to me, I mouthed the strange word, suddenly before I knew it I uttered it out loud, Very Loud, then I said another word like buunara, I carried on for 30 minutes speaking not only the words the Angels use, the heavenly language, but German, Russian, Chinese everything I did not want it to stop, I have never felt so good in my whole life and it has never repeated itself.

It would be a very unnatural use of language and I think that's one of the ways in which language is wise.

«It's the language some preachers would use that conservative Catholics would be very comfortable with.

There is the further psychological insight that the person who uses religious language very freely, and who appears completely dependent on pious feelings and sentiments, may be concealing a profound disbelief in the very doctrines he aggressively affirms.

When you give everything a subjective aim, and make this apply right down the scale, you are using language which is very difficult to make intelligible, except in the case of what Whitehead calls «high grade organisms.»

In her very complex but well - argued essay, she shows how the claim for epistemic knowledge - which, in the context of this article, would link it to the efforts to «politicise identity» or to use identity «strategically» - assumes a single centre of authority and also assumes making use of the language and tools of this authority.

Hartshorne has expressed a similar philosophy very much in traditional Aristotelian terms, for example in his use of the language of perceptual relatedness for Whitehead's prehension.

But what do you do with passages in which Jesus uses very particularist language?

Any congregation that is committed to Christian action in its community needs to have at its center or very close to it, a group of men and women prepared to be — to use military language — the reconnaissance and intelligence force of the main body.

In the sort of language we have used in these pages, man knows that he should be on the road to love, but he finds himself frustrated on that road; while at the same time he knows very well (once he is honest with himself) that he has so decided, often against his better judgement and in contradiction to his deep desires and purpose, to reject the opportunities to love and to receive love, that he is a failure.

That is much stronger language than you used in your letter — very much stronger.

It is not so difficult to get it accepted for private use, but it is extremely difficult to substitute its newer language in the liturgies, for these things acquire a near sanctity which resists innovation very strongly.