Not exact matches
I am
very liberal about religion, and understand and agree with the
point you are trying to make with irony here, but the statement above is also, I think, sadly, a
legitimate way to interpret the gospels.
Even when the
point is
legitimate (and plenty of
very smart people can make
very smart cases for Oklahoma State and / or a one - loss LSU team), it just blends in with the sentiments of people who root for chaos and mess at all costs.
Connolley
points out that the
legitimate scientists made
very guarded statements, as indeed they did.
Thank you for your
very well thought - out and researched response... it was a great read and you bring up a lot of
legitimate points.
Both of the prior comments are
very accurate and
point out
very legitimate issues with this article.
Connolley
points out that the
legitimate scientists made
very guarded statements, as indeed they did.
And indeed given the state of science and technology now and in 40 years time, the remark about» political will», in other words the cost people are prepared to bear (an entirely
legitimate point) does not sound like such a
very big call.
Generally speaking, aside from
very specific types of cases involving contracts, or specific types of statutory relief, a Plaintiff typically includes counts for things like NIED (negligent infliction of emotional distress), pain and suffering, loss of consortium, loss of future earning capacity — these are a few of the types of counts whereby there is no specific value a defendant could ever
point to being «fully satisfied» — the reason being, a jury needs to determine the
legitimate value of these claims unless the Plaintiff accepts a settlement award whereby he / she / it feels as if it's fully satisfied.