Sentences with phrase «very less carbohydrates»

Flattened rice is rich in vitamin B and contains very less carbohydrates.

Not exact matches

It contains very little fat (typically less than 3 %), carbohydrates or lactose and can be used as a daily supplement for those who do not consume the recommended amount of protein in their diet or those who are lactose intolerant.

For 2 million years of our evolution, we ate much less carbohydrate than we do now, and no refined or processed carbohydrates, and therefore, our systems are simply not designed to handle the big swings in blood sugar levels caused by the Western diet, which is very high in carbohydrates of all kinds.

The Paleo food list is deprived of carbohydrates, so the chances of insulin spike are very less.

That means that you're eating a relatively high fat diet with not too much protein, and very low amount carbohydrates, 50 grams or less.

In my VERY humble opinion, when referring to the Standard American Diet, or SAD, anything less than 100 grams of carbohydrate per day is pretty low carb.

Some Paleo diets are very low carbohydrate, others are not — while you will get less carbohydrates on Paleo, the goal is not necessarily «low carb.»

The brain, a glucose sucker, will burn approximately 100 - 125 grams of carbohydrates daily and a typical 1 hour of weights with 24 - 35 sets total can burn anywhere from 40 - 70 grams of carbohydrates for a 170 lb person So, your muscle glycogen levels would be at very low levels if you typically consume less than 140 - 170 carbohydrate grams daily.

In fact, you could easily make the case that vitamin B1 plays the most critical role of all, acting as the gate keeper between the less efficient step of early carbohydrate breakdown and the very energy - rich Krebs» cycle and electron transport chain.

Unlike their very close relatives in the dried bean category (including navy, pinto, and black beans), green beans are lighter weight and less densely packed with carbohydrates.

The «ideal» level of carbohydrates is very individual but I eat 30 - 50 g net carbs and I haven't found any additional benefits of following an extremely low - carb diet (such as 20g or less).

It's very likely that all the control groups who ate less carbohydrates just ate less calories altogether.

The windows of concentrated carbohydrates restriction are much wider compared to high intensity sports, but, once fat - adapted, this actually becomes very easy for athletes to achieve because the risk of being thrown out of metabolic fat - adaptation back into carbohydrate dependency are significantly less.

Although at this time there isn't universal agreement on the term, a few years ago leading researchers in the field of carbohydrate restriction proposed the definition of very - low - carbohydrate ketogenic diets as those containing less than 50 grams of total carbohydrate per day.

Unlike other beans, soybean carbohydrate contains very little starch (which humans can digest)-- less than 1 percent.10, 11

I will spend a bit of time going over this and the next study cited by CarbSane and presented here, as they are excellent examples of really bad science (if that word should even be used at all) that are very misleading, and they in no way support the position that increasing carbohydrate intake is healthy... at best perhaps only somewhat less unhealthy than worse diets.

Adhering to these traditional concepts the US Department of Agriculture has concluded that diets, which reduce calories, will result in effective weight loss independent of the macronutrient composition, which is considered less important, even irrelevant.14 In contrast with these views, the majority of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosis.

Regarding carbohydrate source, a diet with a low versus high glycemic index can be used to reduce HbA1c moderately (by ∼ 0.5 %).13 Case series and pilot studies reveal more substantial improvements in HbA1c and other benefits (less hypoglycemia and reduced glycemic variability) with a very low — carbohydrate diet (VLCD).14 — 21 Although varying to some degree among studies, a VLCD is typically defined as ≤ 20 to 50 g per day of carbohydrates or ≤ 5 % to 10 % carbohydrates as a proportion of calories.22 — 24 In T1DM, small sample sizes and methodological issues limit the significance of VLCD benefits, and little is known about prevalence, practice, and sustainability.

It is thus, very important to choose cat food that has significantly less carbohydrate content.

I think the Ziwipeak one will have slightly less carbohydrates — which is a very good thing!

It does contain a lot of grains but the overall carbohydrate percentage is less than 40 percent and that's very low for a popular dog food.