Sentences with phrase «very little history»

Therapists have very little history in talking about civic commitments, Doherty says.
Puppy «millers» usually can not answer questions about the dogs they sell, have no idea what proper dog care is about and do not have any med certificates (to them it's cost) or health guarantees and have no or very little history of breeding a particular breed.

Not exact matches

And so when I read Ben Graham, sort of a light bulb went off just this little article and I started reading everything I could about what he had written, both security analysis and the intelligent investor, and eventually led my way to Warren Buffett and you know, sort of the rest is history, it's a very good age, you know I was younger than 21 at the time you know junior year of college to recognize that this was what I was going to be doing the rest my life.
updated april 30, 2018 — If you have a bad credit history or very little (or no) credit history, banks may approve you for a secured credit card that requires a refundable security deposit but otherwise works just like any other credit card (meaning you pay your balance each month, payments are NOT taken from your deposit).
Let's talk very little about real estate, and a lot about people's behaviour and the anatomy of bubbles throughout history.
Typical anti-Semitic rant from someone who has never been to Israel or Gaza or the West Bank, but likes to fake sympathy for Palestinians; and from someone who obviously knows very little about history in general and Jewish history more specifically.
I advice you to read a little more history of Pope Pius XII the pope which has very much been maligned by folks like yourself.
Thus university theology is characteristically in search of the very possibility of theology as such and tends, on the one hand, rarely to advance beyond prolegomena, programmatic probings, or an apologetic natural theology — unless it turns, on the other hand, with no little relief, to the very respectable study of the history of theology (as demonstrated, for instance, by the Bonhoeffer Society, the 19th Century Working Group of the AAR, the Tillich Working Group, or even the recently founded Karl Barth Society).
To say the church is non-transitory shows that you know very little about the history of your own religion.
Because there are others who believe the same way I do, and we have the best Bible scholars, and the best seminaries, and the biggest churches, and the most authors, and our missionaries are very active overseas, and we agree with most of the teachings of the church throughout history... at least since the Reformation anyway... and I believe that with time, and a little education of how to really study the Bible, people will eventually see that what I believe is the right way to believe.
Very little of the history has been verified, etc. etc..
They've even told him the «thinking has been done», so there is very little chance he / she actually did a thorough study of the church, it's history and it's prophets before deciding it was «the true church.»
The point is, succinctly made by John Jay Chapman, that «mere financial dishonesty is of very little Importance in the history of civilization.
I could go on, but the fact of the matter is, if you use just the bible to map out a timeline it's a little wonky but doable because for over 2000 years its had revisions and edits so that it would make more sense, if you want to really look the history of the world through geology, ice core samples and what not, it'll paint a very different picture.
I've found that most Christians know very little about the history of the church.
Their prior history counts for very little compared to the transforming power of the Spirit available to the Christian community.
Very little in the bible is supported by science or history.
While I can read church history and come to the conclusion that for a very long time the church has been about lots of things that had little or nothing to do with Jesus, in my own time I can see it with my own eyes.
As you know, David, I agree very little with the christian church when it comes to history or theology.
If, for example, evil has been defeated from the very outset, and human history has already been secured by God in election, does this not render history a mere process by which God can effect the inevitable triumph of his grace, with human beings little more than the passive beneficiaries of his boundless and irresistible good will and grace?
Most of them were well versed in Scriptures, religious history, liturgy, church law, and other tools of their trade, but they knew very little about the human beings with whom they had to deal.
Evil is blind to its own weakness and possesses little imagination — Sauron's inability to see the Hobbits wandering into the heart of his lands, because of their very insignificance — it takes Gandalf in his goodness to see the important part the hobbits will play in world history.
We know very little about the first epoch of human history, that four million years or so when humans lived in an oral mode, because during that period they left almost no records of their existence.
First of all, there is very little theology in America today: dogmatic theology has virtually disappeared, biblical scholarship is largely archeological and philological, church history barely maintains its existence as a discipline; and, in terms of German influences, Bultmann has replaced Barth as the guiding light of the younger theologians.
To say that «society causes» x or y, or to appeal to impersonal «social forces» that have a blind necessity to them, tells us very little as to why people act the way they do and history develops the way it does.
If we were to apply this as standard in judging the Islamic world then there would be very little argument that this is a hideous cancer and retrograde belief system that should be relegated to the trash bin of history.
I was very judgemental in my youth, but without i would have gain little unless thru p@ssing grades... granted then i might have been what i wanted to be — History professor, with a degree in geo, bio, and bot — for those who can't follow that....
Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, Descartes, Locke, Hume, Kant, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein: all knew something of the history of philosophy (although Wittgenstein evidently very little); none were historians of philosophy.
«Because of my family's own immigration story — having started out very small with very little resources and growing into this giant in Asian foods — we've decided to let people in on the history and the story behind our company, and the fact that in the United States, you really can achieve your dream,» Quesada says.
We're resurrecting a little slice of American cake history with this very vintage homemade pumpkin spice layer cake recipe slathered with fresh pumpkin butter custard frosting, oh way.
«A mixture of sliced cucumbers, shallots, or onions, cut very small, a little lime juice, and Madeira wine, with a few pods of bird pepper well mashed, and mixed with the liquor, is reckoned an unfailing stimulant to the appetite in the West Indies, and is called man - dram,» wrote William Rhind in A History of the Vegetable Kingdom (London: Blackie & Son, 1868).
a few of my grandchildren deciced they wanted to spend the weekend and while doing so decided to look for something they themselve could make for themand grandma for lunch while i was out doing things in the garden, so to make a long story short when asked if they could make lunch i said sure but no cooking on the stove.thinking that would save them geyying hurt in any way.i half exoecte beanut butter and jelly or ham and chesse sandwiches and chips or something but what got was This wonderful Taco Pizza., I always keep taco meat made up i the freezer along with all the other things in which to make easy fast dishes for them needless to say i was delighted and surprized., when i askes how they did it I was told thats for us to know and you to enjoy.well I did and i think that if a 14,10 and very very smart 3 yr old can make this its simply wonderful.thank you and it took some work but i bribed the 10 yr old into telling my where he found it thank goodness the computer has history, lol, and bookmarking.its something every mother or grandmother should try to make with their little taco lovers.thank you From a grandmother
There is history a little bit because of what happened and overall it was always very difficult for us.
Our majority share holder holds very little passion for the football club with the history that comes with it, the guy who owns walmart isn't exaclty known for doing the right thing over profit.
There is history a little bit because of what happened and overall lit was always very difficult for us.
A cursory glance at the table might suggest that this final day has very little to offer, and a quick glance back through the history books confirms that there hasn't been a final day so apparently lacking in drama since... oh, hang on.
The role of the fans at this juncture it our club's history appears lost of most individuals who frequent this site following a victory... I'll explain further, but first I must state that I have cared for this club dearly for the better part of 35 years, so my critique is both measured and carefully considered... there is certainly nothing wrong with celebrating a victory, regardless of the circumstances, but making wild predictions or fawning over players after a lacklustre win solves very little, if anything it enables those in charge to continue down the road too frequently traveled
So next time you talk about what we «deserve» be sure to know our history and understand that this 2015 discussion would in all probability be something very low - key and uninspirational if history had been different and Dein had not signed up a little known French manager in September 1996.
Fulham, on the other hand, have had very little to cheer about when on their travels, which is a problem that has plagued their Premier League history.
Left back maybe, but I seriously doubt it given our history in the January transfer window and Poch's comments suggest very little will be done.
My kids, who know very little of it, were enthralled with the history!
I am not, as you claim, absolving everyone else from all responsibility (my appearance on the hate list of so many local school admins is testament to my history of holding people here responsible), but the PRIMARY responsibility for the mess this country is in when it comes to food, nutrition, obesity and health, has very little to do with what goes on in school cafeterias.
If past is prologue, campaigns have very little concrete history to work with when it comes to individual voters — which is one reason that canvassing and phone - banking are so important, since each one has the potential to yield significantly more information about a voter's beliefs and intentions than a campaign will otherwise have access to.
A brief history lesson into how Daniel Arap Moi won the 1992 and ’97 elections, after reluctantly introducing multipartism in 1991, tells us there was very little new about violence around an election.
Let's wrap up a tumultuous few days with something a little more enlightening than the average blog post — a Very Serious Look at the secret Pentagon history of using cats in warfare.
«Anyone who wants to revise history and airbrush out the immigrants is going to find very little left in America and we need to have that conversation,» he said.
Despite the two nations having common sunni populations, they have had a rough history and the Saudi's have little influence within Turkey and very often, Turkey opposes Saudi efforts.
Nana Addo has tried to occupy the Flagstaff House and failed on two earlier occassions, but he (and many others) believe that the third time is the charm whereas Donald Trump is looking upset the system as a businessman with very little political history taking on the quest to gain the White House.
If history is any guide we might expect the Conservatives to do a little better as most of the battleground seats have new Conservative incumbents, but only by a very small amount — the reality is that Con - Lab marginals do tend to behave in pretty much the same way as the nation as a whole does.
Organ donors with a history of certain types of cancers who are excluded from transplantation in fact pose very little risk of cancer transmission to their recipients,» said Dr. Desai.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z