Sentences with phrase «very live questions»
In the meantime, we return to some very live questions.
http://www.religion-online.org/ Not exact matches
No matter where I was, or who I was talking to, the questions were all very similar — people wanted to know how to navigate the changes technology was influencing in their every day lives.
One question / concern I always have with these charts is that even at 2 - 3 million you are not looking at a very «comfortable» life post retirement.
Investing In Firearms And Ammo Companies There's no question we live in a very dangerous world.
«The kind of departments are very similar to our members, the average age is 30 to 35 years old, everyone wants to create life's work... We're saying we're keeping a close eye on it, there's definitely a cap — no question there's a cap.»
One of my audience members asked this very question on a recent Facebook Live broadcast on my Page.
Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.
When we used live chat they made themselves available online very quickly and answered our questions and concerns easily and in a satisfactory manner.
This is one of the questions I can't answer because it is so ingrained (worked into the very fiber of our being) in all of us who have been sitting in a pew for all or most of our lives.
«He was simply asking the question «how do we express ourselves in the 20th century in ways that communicate with people living in the modern world, and a very secular world?»»
Very interesting fairy tale like the rest of Christianity in particular and religion in general providing answers for the unanswerable question of life after death.
It is a very helpful guide to the formation of conscience with respect to questions raised in voting and other political activity if, in fidelity to the Church's teaching, one recognizes the «intrinsic evil» of taking innocent human life in abortion.
I think our lives should make a difference for how our work is received, [so] John's behaviour presents a very serious question about the use of his work.
All of this is to say that to see the story as conveying an experience of believing or «belief in action» is to see it as very close indeed to the parable form, for, as we noted in our comments on the parable of the Wedding Feast, the implied question was, On what logic — that of merit or of grace — do you actually live your life?
A lot of pro-choice folks like to say that «no one is pro-abortion,» but when celebratory concert series and festivals are organized around the anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, I can't help but question the degree to which we have desensitized ourselves to the reality that abortion means the termination of, at the very least, a potential life, something that should never be celebrated with balloons and rock concerts.
The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?
Yet as inconceivable as it may seem, the question of his messianic consciousness is a very live one in scholarly circles.
This, of course, raises the very difficult question of what happens to the saint's excess merit if that saint is brought back to life.
If the non-believer who is proud, fully desiring, and un-receptive of practicing their sin of homosexuality and they love being around the believer then that would make me question what's wrong with that believer because the scripture says; «Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted — 2 Timothy 3:12, No proudly practicing sinner of any kind will stay with a believer very long just ask Liz
They will not of course explicitly contest that even the pious Christian who holds fast unconditionally to the instructions of the Gospel and of the Church can still raise innumerable questions regarding public and private life, of very considerable importance, yet can not expect to get answers to them directly from the Church.
When my father died, shortly after I was ordained a priest, I discovered that I had many more questions than answers and that some very safe assumptions about the goodness and permanence of life had been shattered.
After eight years of doing this and now dealing with two teenagers living under my very own roof who ask the same question, I've got the answers down pat and can dismiss my students at the bell confident that they have at least a hazy sense that maybe going to church next Sunday wouldn't be a complete waste of their time.
Thus both history and the very nature of the sexual question have guaranteed that the church will be more involved in this area than in most other areas of human life.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.
Your question about those who live the best lives they can but are unable to believe God is real is a very good question.
These serious, excellent, upright, deeply sensitive people who are still Christian from the very heart: they owe it to themselves to try for once the experiment of living for some length of time without Christianity; they owe it to their faith in this way for once to sojourn «in the wilderness» — if only to win for themselves the right to a voice on the question whether Christianity is necessary.»
The question is very simple, i'm asking for Atheists to give us some collaborating evidences that you have a better way of life and better solutions to make this world a better place to live.
I agree that tyhose who lived two thousand years may have come up with some far out ways to address the big questions we still can not answer such as how something came from nothing - George Gamow and his big bang 1500 years from now may very well seem just as stupid.
I was happy to see fellow bloggers raise some good questions: Was this list simply a manifestation of inequities inherent to American church culture, or did it fail to reflect the very real influence women and minorities have, both online and in the everyday life of the church?
We live in an age when the very idea of truth is often called into question.
The issue of divine temporal valuation transcends these theodical questions, for it concerns the very nature of God as a living God.
Thunder, with that mentality — the determination to never question or seek objective answers — you will have a very hard time learning anything solid in this life.
Yes, this teaching can be used in very abusive ways, to control people, and keep them from questioning what the man up front is teaching or doing, or even how he is living in his personal life.
So long as Israel lived a reasonably secure existence, unthreatened by external disasters, the hope for the future was not a question which loomed very large.
These words and the concepts associated with them were very useful for intellectual purposes, but they made no contribution to life, and Levin suddenly felt he was in the position of a man who had exchanged a warm fur coat for a muslin blouse, and who the first time he finds himself in the frost is persuaded beyond question, not by arguments but by the whole of his being, that he's no better than naked and is inevitably bound to perish miserably.16
And that is the greatest irony: for the spirit of criticism that among so many academics has fossilized into a pose has its origins nowhere but among the Greeks, who were the first to question critically everything from the gods to political power to their very selves, the first to live what Socrates called «the examined life.»
For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
Jesus may very well be the answer, but if you want a good conversation, you may need to clarify what the question is, because the first question is not about eternal life, but about the nature of reality itself.
Others were restored by Rabbi Akiba.35 Besides the manifest intent of providing a rationalization for the exegetical program of the rabbinic scholars, this tradition also reflects awareness of the problem of forgetfulness of those very questions and their answers on which full human life depends, and the continual need, by means of exegesis, to seek their recovery for contemporary life.
It follows in the footsteps of the very best of the science fiction genre in forcing us to ask uncomfortable questions about the world we live in.
That this question is not formulated is by no means under all circumstances a sign of undeveloped thinking or of an immature, childish understanding of human existence; it can also be the sign of a very different interpretation of human life which is the reverse of childish.
Some would insist that each life is valuable, others might question whether some children with very severe brain damage are in any real sense capable of human life.
I learnt very quickly that if I had a question or a problem with the church or theology then it would be my problem not theirs, they would turn it around so that I would have to work thru something in my life — I would be at fault and I got to thinking (rather plaintively I might add) «why cant I be right for once?»
Admittedly, these questions reflect a very limited spiritual aptitude; but they also suggest that whether or not there is some spiritual existence after death, it will have absolutely nothing to do with life as we know it here and now.
The question of when human life begins is indisputably and very publicly settled by science.
Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»
I was a very spiritually sensitive person; always asking the deeper questions of life.
He has, to be sure, answered this question, not only in his Scripture but in the very constitution of our natures: to choose life, to be fruitful and multiply, and to walk in his ways, which means among other things to understand that life makes sense and that human fulfillment resides in resisting the ever - present temptation to return to tohu vavohu — the primordial chaos and void.
The question that Christians (or other religious people) should ask themselves here is philosophical rather than sociological: Granting (as I think we must) that modern science has given us new and often penetrating insights into reality and that modern technology has enormously increased our control over our lives, is it not possible that in the process some very precious things have been lost?
I found that while most students had not given this question much thought, they found it very helpful in articulating their life orientation and providing an opportunity to learn about themselves.