I think the resumes of the future will continue to show people who don't have
very long tenure at their various companies due to the traits of generations and more.
Another common mistake while buying online term insurance is taking a cover for
a very long tenure, sometimes even extending to post retirement years.
While this is certainly
a very long tenure, has it produced outstanding results?
Not exact matches
The company has a love affair with their leadership team, evidenced by their employees
long tenure with the company and the
very high reviews of their CEO on Glassdoor.
«We're a
very people - oriented company,» he adds, noting that bd's employs many
long -
tenured staff members including those who have worked for the company for more than 10 years.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the
long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should
very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his
tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the
long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens
very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
As for Tagliabue, his waving off of the concussion issue in the»90s, and the league's turning a blind eye to head injuries for much of his
tenure, no doubt damaged his candidacy for joining in Canton the
very men at risk for
long - term impacts of brain trauma due to the sport.
The list is
very long, but a few brother combos that I had the privilege to coach during my
tenure at Livermore were the Matheson brothers (Pete and Sammy), Philbrick brothers (Kermit and Zach), Page brothers (Scott and Shane), Chavira brothers (Anthony, Daniel, and Elias), Le brothers (Minh Nhat, Noel, and Ferrier), Diaz brothers (Richard and Jesus), Iacono brothers (Joe and John), and Kavanagh brothers (Marc, Adam, and Donny).
«Despite his
long tenure in upstate politics, Faso was one of just 15 Republicans to win by single digits in 2016 — and he did so against
very liberal, carpet - bagging Democrat Zephyr Teachout,» Wasserman said.
For example somebody like me who was a director of elections for a
very long time, when I finished my
tenure and I was to take my pension, my pension was?
On the other side, during the
long tenure of Governor George Clinton,
very rarely an office holder was removed, and the Council only filled vacancies as they occurred by resignation, death, declination of re-appointment, or term limit.
If you were going to invent career education from scratch, you would never stick it inside a school with
tenured faculty, many of whom haven't been on the job for the skill they're teaching in a
very long time.
As for key - man risk, see my Owner - Operators paragraph above: Neil Record's already in a Chairman role (i.e. he's already stepped back from day - to - day management), senior execs have a
very long average
tenure, there are no star traders, the company specifically hires young & trains up its employees in the business / culture, and frankly they'd never win a pension mandate in the first place based solely on a single employee or two.
Considering the median millennial
tenure at a job is around 3 years, I think one should be
very wary of thinking that's going to be good for the
long haul.
The time period of cancer - related treatment is usually
very long; so, the
longer the
tenure of your policy, the more coverage you will get for cancer treatment.
your explanation about
tenure and riders is misleading the fact is that the
longer the period, the premiums rate gets reduced as one pays for a
longer period rider cost money no doubt, but it is a
very small fraction of the base premium and the benefits that one can derive from riders far exceed the premium charged
«Even if the premium may be lower, the
tenure is not
very long.
Facebook has a
very tight and
long -
tenured executive team, and while Stamos was not necessarily in CEO Mark Zuckerberg's most immediate circle, he had a significant role at a
very significant moment for the company.