You need to worry about people who may vote Lib / Dem not those who may vote for either of these two
very minor parties.
Not exact matches
Had London managed to finish just a bit more strongly, the GOP would have lost its ballot line and been relegated to
minor party status — an incident that haunts
party members (those with long memories, anyway) to this
very day.
By contrast, when the original ballot access lawsuit was filed in 2007 by three
minor parties, it got no publicity at all when it was filed, and even after it won in September 2010, it got
very little publicity.
Minor party activists are working
very hard to influence state legislators in at least four states, to either support bills for easier ballot access, or to oppose bills that make it worse.
There was a reason why
minor parties were
very reluctant to stand in that period, and it wasn't because of the different deposit requirements: check out the history of
minor parties from 1918 to 1945.
Rather it seems to be the «others» who are gaining support — though at around 8 % their total is still
very low compared to the 18 %
minor parties got at the last mayoral election, albeit, that was probably partially to do with the election falling on the same day as the European elections and the consequential boost for UKIP.
But a typical
minor party has a
very tough time polling 5 % in a presidential election year, when nothing statewide is up in Nebraska except President and, sometimes, U.S. Senate.
Most observers expect the
party will easily meet this threshold, but other
minor parties — like the Greens — could
very well surpass it in terms of overall votes, which would mean the WFP would lose its hard - won position on Row D.
This often causes mayhem as the political
parties with the most votes jockey for control by trying to convince
minor and often extreme
parties to join their coalition and agreeing to some
very extreme and
very self interest centered goals of the
minor parties.
Even with ending the waiver and its new prominence following the Smith arrest, Wilson - Pakula is still
very much inside baseball for politicos as the governor is essentially picking a fight with
minor party bosses that could have broader implications down the road.
With a typical car crash limitation period of two years, those claims are either
very,
very minor, or the defence insurer has brought out the
party hats for an unfairly low settlement.
Cs made their claim and in doing so, relied upon the commentary in Volume 38 (2) of the Encyclopaedia of Forms & Precedents that states the inclusion of a «call - in» clause should at least be considered in any case other than: «the
very simplest cases such as an application for change of use or for the carrying out of relatively
minor building operations where... it is unlikely that the grant of planning permission would be challenged by third
parties by way of judicial review....»