I have never found that atheists are
very moral people, actually most I have known have been liars and hostile individuals.
Not exact matches
«I've been of the opinion that we should have a
very big focus on developing alternatives, because alternatives would make it easier for
people — would facilitate — the
moral reasoning and the compassion.»
Since most
people rely on some kind of substance to help them escape pain, to relax, or to socialize, the
moral question is whether the immediate good outweighs the possible harm» something
very specific to each situation.
There are many songs written and played by
people against whom I have the most fundamental and passionate disagreements in the
moral and intellectual realms (which are the most important ones), yet hearing their songs can evoke ecstatic feelings that are
very much like feelings of worship and longing for God.
Ridicule and
moral opprobrium, and manifestations of sheer hatred for one's
very being, are not easy to bear, especially for conscientious and upright and morally sensitive
people.
I am
very impressed with the
moral person that he is and the leadership he has shown in all aspects of his life.
I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a
very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my
moral fiber... i don't judge
people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE...
people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...
If you wish to think that fighting over the basic rights of
people and not providing life sustaining medical care to all is
moral, then your definition of
moral is
very screwed up.
Very often this diversity is delineated entirely in terms of the sex, race, or ethnicity of the
person or group speaking rather than any substantive difference in
moral or political aims.
More prevalent and more insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere
people by the
very nature of its claim to base
moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible rational principles.
Also, isn't creating a nation that oppresses other
people based upon a restrictive set of «
morals»
very un-Christian like?
I realize it is
very difficult to believe, with the
morals that most
people grow up with that any religion can be so violent and extreme, but, there are those who have warped the Muslim faith and that is a tragedy.
While this programme makes a
very creditable contribution to the development of a sound Catholic
moral position for young
people, it has not yet used to best advantage what is available in the still largely unappreciated «theology of the body» of Pope John Paul II.
Well that's what you're doing all over this blog, attacking
people, if you can't see it you're ignorant, if you don't see anything wrong with it, you're not a
very good
person, and if you truly believe you don't need religion to be a good
person and have a
moral center than you should be able to see that what you're doing here is absolutely wrong and what you're doing is basically on the level with racism.
The liberal church's success in the future will depend
very much on whether liberal clergy have a vision to express; whether they will be able to appeal to
people's
moral imagination.
Lastly, I want to say to Dave — you are not a apostate — you are not a bad pastor — you are actually a
very good
person, with good
morals, and great communicator.
I generally put this down to
very religious
people (who have been raised with the concept that God is personally invested in them and is a central force in their life) experiencing the thought of a
person without a religious belief system as being close to someone soul-less: without
morals and without any fear of punishment (hell), so obviously less trustworthy than religious
people who have a spiritual Big Brother and religious community watching their every move.
In the encyclical Evangelium Vitae, the Pope expressed this relationship within the framework of the common good: «It is urgently necessary, for the future of society and the development of a sound democracy, to rediscover those essential and innate human and
moral values which flow from the
very truth of the human being and express and safeguard the dignity of the
person: values which no individual, no majority, and no State can ever create, modify, or destroy, but must only acknowledge, respect, and promote.»
Many of us who have written about Rawls» argument have noted that the
people behind his famous «veil of ignorance» are a peculiar kind of
people (i.e.,
people very much like John Rawls) and therefore can hardly serve as the normative deliberators producing universal
moral principles.
The
very term collateral damage reminds us that we often fail to maintain the
moral distinctions that decent
people try to draw.
I understand why Christians have
moral objections to abortion, and I know a lot of good Christian
people who have
very good reasons for voting Republican....
She was a
very righteous
person,
very moral.
However, the NY Magazine article highlights something
very important — the
people of God, who are called to hold to the highest standard of
morals and ethics, now rank as the highest group percentage-wise of those who say that these things don't necessarily matter.
We find ourselves thinking in strategic not
moral terms, and we are not
very realistic about the consequences of such a choice for the
people we might be defending.
While it is evidently not true to say that young
people are less
moral than their parents, it is quite true to say that what they understand morality to include or exclude is often
very different.
We are witnessing a
very major policy shift, with partisans on all sides making high - octane
moral noises, and yet with few
people fessing up to what is really happening.
I don't believe in the tenants of the faith or any religion for that matter, but I do know a lot of Mormons are generally
very good
people with high
moral standards.
On St. Thomas's view, freedom is in fact the great organizing principle of the
moral life — and since the
very possibility of a
moral life (the capacity to think and choose) is what distinguishes the human
person from the rest of the natural world, freedom is the great organizing principle of a life lived in a truly human way.
Nor does he impose his own
moral vision on the
very real lives of
people with a vision and morality of their own.
It is important as revealing also the character of the
people, of government to some extent, of their ancient religion, and
very revealing indeed as to their
moral ideals.
Of course it's
very stupid to feel that way, and that
moral victory is the reason why
people lose so much money on gambling in a nutshell.
But
very few
people have any historical context and just drink the free market capitalistic koolaid, so they say things like «It's their money» as if that sentence alone provides all the
moral context anyone could possibly need.
I think any and everyone would agree that John Terry is a
person with questionable
morals but he is still one of the best CBs in the world and looks to be usurped in that regard by Cahill
very soon.
New Ground, new Manager (against all
morals), New team (with
very little of the team ethic that we know and love), new backroom staff (again, the loyalty these
people showed us through the tough times and it gets thrown in their faces), throwing money around like we are a rich club, despite writing off millions that we owe to local businesses.
Voluntary groups are now in a
very dark
moral place, «imposing zero - hours contracts on staff, asking unpaid volunteers to take on additional obligations they feel morally unable to refuse, and in many cases, prioritising core services around a narrower spectrum of
people in need».
For me the
moral of the story is
very simple: we should never silence
people, we should never attack
people for who they are, we should always prefer to be offended and we should always allow
people we disagree with to speak.
«In fact, I become
very excited anytime I watch
persons of Indian origin speaking Twi... what really attracts me to watch the series is that the characters speak pure and unadulterated Twi and I can't really find words to describe the
moral lessons in the telenovela... I am
very grateful to Adom TV for this...,» Nana Kwasi Wadie said when he toured the studios of Adom TV.
«There is no
moral equivalency between the minimum wage, which effects hundreds of thousands of low paid workers in this state, and raising the wages of
very affluent
people,» Smith said.
Unions were linked with rioters: «Referring to the need to garner support for curbing trade union power, John Hoskyns, head of Mrs Thatcher's policy unit, proposed: «We should try — implicitly and subtly, not
very obviously — to link in
people's minds the
moral similarity between high pay claims demanded with menaces and other forms of anti-social behaviour, including rioting and looting.»
Mariette: You raise a fascinating area of what some
people have looked at the
moral responsibilities that we have as well, especially around emerging diseases or fast - moving diseases and the need to understand them scientifically, where we know for a fact, as you've said, we can mitigate some symptoms, but we're also trying to gather data so that we make sure our therapeutics are
very sound.
I can't imagine anyone throwing rocks at such a great
person who has worked in a
very competitive industry without losing his
moral compass or caving in to the constant pressure to lower standards in order to increase profits!
I am a
very honest guy, i have a great sense of humor, i am
very compassionate and sensual
person, I am romantic... (or at least try to be), I have old fasion values and
morals.
I am a
very kind, loving, caring
person with a great sense of humor.I am a christian with high
morals.
Being fun out going
morals great sense of humor good personality laid back caring down to earth
very calm
person
I am
very laid back, down to earth man, nonjudgmental, accept
people for who they are, I don't put on aires, and above all, I am honest, a
person with good
moral character and integrity and will always keep it real... 100 %.
I'm a hippy type
person,
very spiritual with strong
morals, and I don't believe in coincidence.
hello my name is margaret i live in Bartow fl i have been alone in 2015 lost my loving husband looking for my last soulmate i am a
very love
person and would love to care for you faithful and a woman of my word good
morals and old fashion values
I am a fun loving, God fearing, descent, with a good
moral attitude and a caring heart; i have never been married no kids I am a
very happy
person and am always friendly with everyone around me, I love Arts, Dining, Family, Movies, Listening to Music, Outdoor Activities, Photography, Reading, Travel...
I am funny,
very political, with high
morals when it comes to honesty and how
people in general should treat each other.
I'm a
very good girl with strong
morals, I respect myself and I respect other
people.