Sentences with phrase «very much a question»

Your partner of choice Accessing the many benefits of these clever materials is very much a question of engaging with the expert self - adhesive label printers who complement the labelstock suppliers as members of FINAT.

And it's very much a question of water in the exhibition «e» a» u»» by Jarbas Lopes.

Also at McGill, «you are surrounded by both teachers and their peers who are very much questioning the very work that they do... the structure in which the legal infrastructure is set up,» she says.

Furthermore, there is possibly a hint that she, as the Divisional Court below her did, may seek to approach the Article 50 case as very much a question of statutory interpretation — «rules of statutory interpretation which govern the way in which we read legislation and enable us to safeguard fundamental rights and the rule law.»

Not exact matches

Whether either man can shepherd a community of nations against the planet's most pressing threats is still very much an open question.

The question is whether over-using it is having a negative impact on the very thing you spent so much time creating an awesome PowerPoint presentation to accomplish.

And critics are also quick to point out that the promised benefits to Main Street of Trump - style tax cuts — faster job growth, higher wages and a boost to the middle class — are very much in question.

Vast wealth is a feature of the stories of both Hollywood and Wall Street, but the role of greed in generating such wealth is very much in question.

Based on his follow - up questions, it was clear that this was still very much my vacation.

«When it starts certifying fisheries that are very much in question, then you can ask yourself whether the MSC has lost its way,» he says.

Whether we're likely to see a temporary drop or another 2008 is very much open to question, though most experts believe the former is likelier than the latter.

How much risk drivers will bear, and what rewards they will enjoy, are very much open questions,» Brishen Rogers, Associate Professor of Law at Temple University, said in a June essay.

«The capacity of central bankers to do that, whether they plan to respond by varying some kind of capital requirement or whether they plan to respond by varying interest rates, seems to be to be very much in question,» Summers said.

[RedBull Journalist] «I don't recall ever being questioned about the work I produced, and was very much in the mindset of a freelance journalist.

There has been a failure to communicate with citizens from the very beginning, abysmal information release to questions — so much so that Alberta Connects refers all my health questions to the government of Alberta to some Bermuda Triangle at Alberta Health where these questions disappear.

Much of the questioning focused on Page's trip to Moscow in early July, while he was a Trump campaign adviser — because his description of that trip in emails sent at the time looks very different from his description of it now.

At the moment, however, the certainty of a strong rebound in the second quarter is very much open to question.

When it comes to answering the question of who should be interviewed, the «who» matters very much.

So, while I agree with much of what you are saying, and appreciate your thought - provoking questions, I feel I recoil a little at what seems to me like the very arrogance you claim to despise.

It is very much like a conversation with one of my children when I have answered them repeatedly only to have the question asked again.

I believe very much... and that question I asked was asked of me ten years ago, and it changed everything about my walk with God.

Born and raised a Christian, I attended Catholic School but saw too much hypocrisy at a very young age, questioning a lot of things and this continued for years until I found my own peace within Islam.

You didn't think about my question very much and I gave you two excellent hints.

the shortest answer to your question is the cross, where God tells us two things clearly: 1) we are much worse off than we want to admit (that's what I deserve)... but at the very same time... 2) we are much more loved than we ever dared hope (Jesus takes what I deserve)

I was told that there was but one path to salvation, and that to so much as ask the questions was to risk your very soul.

The development of a new philosophy of science which radically questions the earlier mechanical - materialistic world - view within which classical modern science worked and also the search for a new philosophy of technological development and struggle for social justice which takes seriously the concern for ecological justice, are very much part of the contemporary situation.

«He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much,» is made more specific by the question.

This broad, liberal creed supported by a set of idealistic categories that never questioned seriously the progressive revelation of the mind of God in the existing personal and social relationships of man has been too much at home in this prosperous world to need to call out a rebellious Danish religious prophet who challenged the very categories of its thought.

I asked a question of this poster that was very much like the one myweight posed to L4H and unshockingly got pretty much the same response... «oh, well, define murder and you have to put it in perspective».

I have no doubt the Pharisees responded in very much the same fashion when questioned as you do.

But, as Mr. Smith rightly observes, whether he is right to be so generous is very much an open question, and there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.

Pretty much the correct answer to any of his questions are ones that agree with his very biased opinion.

But that either / or decision depends very much on a matter - of - degree question, that of the balance between costs and benefits.

I soon realized after reading much of the science and research (I am a Computer Science Grad) that science theorizes and tries to disprove god but very intelligent people know that science does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the big bang.

So my original question very much speaks to what it is we SHOULD be learning from the story.

But now, after years of teaching, reading spiritual journals, and listening to their very real struggles to find God, I hear the question much differently.

One answer to your original question is very much rooted in the good of the populus.

After determining that I was not just another moralist who wanted to influence film content, but someone who was genuinely interested in film, Shurlock relaxed and asked me a question that was very much on his mind: «We are trying to determine what to do about a picture in which director Sidney Lumet wants to include a shot of a woman's bare breasts.

This is indeed a very important question and a very fertile one to bear much fruits in the near future.

Moreover, if God needed to intervene to influence three people to notice Peter and ask this question, that would obviously not be difficult for him to do — though, since Peter had been a very public figure, we have no reason to assume God needed to intervene even this much.

The answer to that question would be, not very much, but what it does say is unrelievedly negative.

I watched with only mild interest until Rick Warren, (who I like very much), asked John McCain an excellent question.

I can very much relate to your comments around questions.

I have told them that I will ask them some very tough questions so it would be a good idea for them to have as much information on the subject (whatever it is) as possible.

The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.

President Obama and the Republicans did not agree on very much over the last two years, but on the question of what this election was all about there was not an inch of daylight between them — at least when the campaign began.

Thank you very much for the discussion — I have further questions, but this isn't a particularly great forum for them.

To be concrete: I happen to belong to a denomination that has tackled this question openly, carefully, prayerfully, and I even venture to say (though I would not say this of very much in my denomination) wisely.

To answer your question, yes, I have struggled with anger, and although I always thought my anger was justified at the time (anger is a reaction to something) I now regret it very much.