Sentences with phrase «very much a reason»

I think our attractive football was very much a reason for this.

In my opinion, that alone is very much a reason to push back as hard as possible.

That ability to remain undetected is very much the reason cybercriminals trade in Bitcoin.

Not exact matches

The reason so many were caught off guard by Hummingbird is that very few paid that much attention when Conversational Search was rolled out nearly two years ago.

It's a very modern way of doing things, Routh says, and it's «part of the reason Lionsgate has grown so much.»

«And it's for the very obvious reason that the yields in the business cabin are much higher than in economy.»

In an interview with the Guardian last month, Cruz said his funding and outreach apparatus «is very much the Obama model — a data - driven, grassroots - driven campaign — and it is a reason why our campaign is steadily gathering strength».

Although I feel very much on track, I am afraid marriage and kids could upend all of this so that is one of the reasons I am have been wary about going down that road.

From next month, holding onto personal data without a very good reason to do so will be far more risky — because GDPR is also backed up with a regime of supersized fines that are intended to make privacy rules much harder to ignore.

So but the reason why they've come down I think is because the actors who really wanted to you know promote their hard for a solution they would benefit by having a lot of transactions on the on the blockchain and they would benefit by having high transaction fees because they would you know strengthen their narrative that things are very urgent but now that SEGUI has been merged even though in practice right now it doesn't make that much difference because in reality the network is not really congested.

This way, the ROI is very much low, so there's no reason for spending so much money.

Academics write about things they know so much about that they no longer have any passion for the subject or any sense of its intrinsic interest, since, for understandable reasons, it is all now very boring to them.

We are in the «Age of Reason» but we seem to be very good at following hair - brained ideas without thinking them through or reasoning much.

In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.

In the name of RELEGION... Oh, and another thing when are the so called GOOD MUSLIMS here in AMERICA and abroad going to stand up to the EXTREMIST / MUSLIMS???? They do not say much because they will be killed by their own MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD... I happen to know some US Muslims and they are very quiet and again there is a reason they are!

Well, it may very well help you avoid panic, but history shows that, as much as anything else, religion and superstition causes people to panic and be at odds with one another for the silliest of reasons.

Regardless of whatever Hitler claimed his official belief system was, you have conceded that he did base his policies, very much, on science, reason, eugenics, and the theory of evolution.

He very much liked South because of two reasons: he was born and brought up in the South and also the extreme severity of racialism existed in Southern parts.

Since atheists over-value these things... I can very much cite Hitler as an example where «reason» and «logic» and «science» and «evolution» led to disaster, and it did.

In this regard I am sorry that Hauerwas did not give us his perspective on Bonhoeffer's «Structure of Responsible Life,» a text that, as far as I can tell, did not inform his discussion very much — for reasons that are not clear to me.

Although I am very far from subscribing to the doctrine of the total depravity of man, it does seem to me to have been proved within my own lifetime that the problem of human evil is not much affected by better education, better housing, higher wages, holidays with pay, and the National Health Service — desirable as all these things may be for other good reasons.

Suddenly, there are competing views of «right»... this is one of the reasons why organized church very much wants a homogenous theology.

As a man of Faith, I can tell you that I believe in Satan a much as I believe in God — for the very simple reason that I have encountered evil — utter, absolute, and in my face — but the spiritual dimension can not be taught — at all.

Now, in the further interest of National Security» or, in the Fast and Furious matter, for reasons that remain unjustified and murky» it pleases some on the secularist left (even those who once fiercely opposed the very «Patriot Act» that seems almost tame by comparison) to cultivate a quiet disinterest as the government accrues ever more power, without so much as a «do what, now?»

If you don't care very much about religion, you're not likely to oppose state action for religious reasons.

We rarely get such reasoned, thoughtful, and well - researched theses on the nature of naturalistic existence and it is very much appreciated.

My point is simply that some justifying arguments for such practices today are very much like the arguments employed in the Holocaust, and that is reason for deepest concern.

This is really abbreviated to not take too much space, but the reason things are such a mess is because Israel failed in it's mission — it is very simple!

For centuries Mark had been the least read and regarded of the four gospels for the very reason that both Matthew and Luke contained most of its material, and had the further advantages of better styles and much additional information on the teaching and life of Jesus.

An account of the transcendental conditions of human life looks very much like the «deliverances of unsituated reason» which Taylor elsewhere terms an «illusion.»

it seems that some people hate Christians so much that it clouds their very reasoning they are so fond of.

Moreover, if God needed to intervene to influence three people to notice Peter and ask this question, that would obviously not be difficult for him to do — though, since Peter had been a very public figure, we have no reason to assume God needed to intervene even this much.

A 1987 survey of the reasons given by women for having abortions made by researchers with the Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is very much pro-abortion, demonstrated this fact.

The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.

It is very much like the Christian model of needing to rely on something outside of yourselves... and if for some reason you sc - rew up, then you must not be a real Christian, nor believe in God enough... so «repent»...!!

These are all things that parents in the United States very much want their children to be able to do; everyone wants his or her kids to have common sense, to be able to reason clearly and to be able to succeed in the world.

I disagree with Voice of Reason, To me, the cross is still very much a Christian symbol, as Christmas is a Christian holiday.

Suffice it to say that Peter Berkowitz's essay on Rawlsian liberalism and its restrictive notion of what counts as «public reason» - a notion that has everything to do with maintaining the naked public square - is very much worth reading.

It rightly allows a place for intelligence and reason within faith, but it simultaneously suppresses much of the very substance of the faith it seeks to defend.

A second reason that humans, especially modern ones, have done so much damage is that they have not understood that their very being is constituted by relations that ultimately connect them to everything in the universe.

This is for two reasons: first, the minister by the detachment of his vocation knows less about the layman's problems than laymen do; and second, such groups too easily run into one more discourse to which by long conditioning it is customary to listen passively without being very much stirred to action.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

To speak of «God» properly — in a way, that is, consonant with the teachings of orthodox Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, Vedantic and Bhaktic Hinduism, Bahá» í, much of antique paganism, and so forth — is to speak of the one infinite ground of all that is: eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, uncreated, uncaused, perfectly transcendent of all things and for that very reason absolutely immanent to all things.

For that reason, I very much appreciate being taught via the expository method.

from having to go through different therapies (none of which held the whole truth btw), i learned that the amygdala is where fear responses and other such primal functions come from... most other creatures are pretty much all amygdala from what i understand, but we have a very developed cerebellum, so are capable of reasoning above or beyond our intitial response.

They love their Daddy very much, but they are honestly becoming more interested in spiritual things as they get older, and are able to reason more.

But this very point gives us reason to ask whether by chance the simplicity and superficiality are not on the side of our critical historians and their rationalistic or agnostic interpretation of a history which is much more complex and difficult and profound, and in which after all God may have something to say.

The temptation of «cheap grace» spans the centuries; we may surmise that the Corinthian Christians were tempted for very much the old reasons.

I would not hire a caveman to help us build an economy, and Rubio's opinions remind me very much of cavemen: outdated, ignorant, and lacking any reason or logic.

We do this for a couple of reasons — to acknowledge that our small church is part of a much bigger Church and to remember that our young community springs from a very old Community.