Sentences with phrase «very much argument»

And as we move down the list, despite some minor differences at the edges, I would suggest that there wouldn't be very much argument related to the top 25.

Interestingly, McIntyre's quarrel with Mann et al is very much an argument based on a genuine consilience dispute in that McIntyre questions the statistical (ie, mathematical) validity underpinning Mann's methodologies.

This is very much the argument of the recent Shaping CPD report: «Recruit, train, develop, retain» — worth a read.

[7] This was very much the argument of Sir Robert Peel whose aim was the peace and good order of the community.

Not exact matches

First, there were 125 men in one large room... The men were very considerate of each other, and I didn't hear a raised voice ever, much less an argument.

All the while, these companies have made an overarching argument that they should not have to follow the kinds of laws that every other industry in the country — very much including the ones that they are disrupting — follow.

The sources of Trump's political support have been much debated, but his argument that trade deals were a «very bad deal» for Americans was compelling to a swath of voters across the political spectrum.

These are very old topics that lead to much bigger arguments.

Add to that the variety of doctrines / Theologies within orthodox Christianity... with Consensus on a very small Core of Truths: God Is, We are not God, Jesus Christ is the Messiah and Salvation is Through Faith / Belief in Him... there is much that lacks Consensus and there are mountains of arguments and counter-arguments for each doctrinal / Theological position.

My point is simply that some justifying arguments for such practices today are very much like the arguments employed in the Holocaust, and that is reason for deepest concern.

Often he gives us a polemic against everlasting life for mortals, and the polemic sounds very much like Luther's argument for salvation by faith alone.

Excuse me, but you're practicing something called the No True Scotsman fallacy, which very much weakens your argument.

I have found myself strongly drawn to the arguments of Austin Ruse (who has written here, here, and here at Crisis), and not very much to those of Ron Belgau or Elizabeth Scalia here at FT.. But how to put it?

«I looked very much at both sides of the argument regarding if it was ok to be a Christian in an active gay relationship, particularly because I was in a relationship with a guy at the time.

There is an argument for cutting back America's collective security arrangements, but if you are going to cut them back so suddenly, you probably shouldn't be cutting the military very much or at all.

Many of us who have written about Rawls» argument have noted that the people behind his famous «veil of ignorance» are a peculiar kind of people (i.e., people very much like John Rawls) and therefore can hardly serve as the normative deliberators producing universal moral principles.

I very much appreciate the various arguments made by so many people.

That shocked me so much and his arguments were very logical.

Arguments for or against theism are very much like arguments in theoretical science, even in matArguments for or against theism are very much like arguments in theoretical science, even in matarguments in theoretical science, even in mathematics.

Gore solemnly nodded and said again, very much like a judge pronouncing the final verdict, «The argument is over.»

as much as I hate arsene, that was very childish and classless, their are more classy ways to hurt arsene, I can't believe fans are fist fighting, PEOPLE WE ARE BROTHERS AND SISTERS, let's attack the real enemy, whilst we lash out and pummel each other, those rich fat snobs (arsene included) laugh there way to the bank, let's show them who owns the club, abandon that stadium and they'll be holding emergency meetings with arsenal care group on how to fix the problem, we'll have them eating out of our hands, verbal arguments are fine, I never badmouth arsene or arsenal in front of a chelsea supporters but when I'm with a gooner I vent my frustration and that's perfectly fine, that's why this website exists.........

You'll probably get a long, well - supported argument about «exactly what is wrong with Raw,» and detailed thoughts on how the WWE has mismanaged their biggest prospects, but it all centers around how spectacle — the thing the WWE in particular depends so much on — needs to be managed very, very carefully.

Whether or not, Courtois is the world's best goalkeeper is very much subjective and open to debate, but there can be argument that he is a very, very special player.

Miliband's strong performance on Thursday has made that argument very much harder.

On reading the speech itself, I think Cruddas» argument to be very much about how to define the battleground by defining Labour's fundamental sense of mission and purpose, animating it in a concrete programme.

I think very highly of Cohen's work generally, but I have to say that this argument did not do much for me.

What annoys me very much about the «whatabout» argument is it is completly devoid of any kind of contextual content whatsoever.

Also it seems evident that Trump is very much out of sync with Europe on this agreement, so, when you begin with «They are not» that's a tricky argument.

Perhaps its not so surprising - given that we co-edited a book on the subject - that I very much agree with your argument about republicanism being a promising third way, as it were, between liberalism and communitarianism....

The great irony of the history, in my view, is that accepting Churchill's critique of the appeasement policy of the 1930s was very explicitly a choice that our interests were inextricably linked with what happened in Europe (there is an argument, made by Paul Kennedy and others, that this can be said of much English and British history back to 1066) and that this inevitably meant speeding the decline of Empire and global power status.

In my view, calling James Murdoch a mafia boss did not actually take the argument very much further.

Viewers picked holes pretty quickly in Clegg's «Lib Dems for coalition» pitch to conference, pointing out that his condemnation of single - party rule therefore undermines any argument that Lib Dem majority (or minority) government rule would be preferable, thus making his much - applauded line «In an ideal world, I wouldn't have to work with either of them because I'd be Prime Minister on my own thank you very much — and I'd like to think I'd do a better job too» fall rather flat.

«Like his constituents, he only has one vote, and he very much sees his role as ensuring that both sides of the argument are put to the people of Plymouth to enable all to make an informed decision on this very important matter,» says an aide.

The burqa may be perceived as promoted due to a view of women very much at odds with the liberal view my the «modern left», which could be a valid progressive argument to prohibit it.

His argument about Cameron's loyalty to the market was strong and much more in line with national sentiment than Cameron, but he was very vulnerable over having turned down a meeting with Pfizer.

Immediately type or write down as much as you can remember: You will notice that by doing it straightaway a surprisingly large part of the material, and at the very least the structure of your argument, will come back to you.

«Nix is structurally very much like Rid, so it says without any argument that this is a similar product, not specialised and scary — remember that the school nurse tends to be very conservative,» says Bachrach.

The model also counters another argument against oceans: that the proposed shorelines are very irregular, varying in height by as much as a kilometer, when they should be level, like shorelines on Earth.

Regardless of what side of the argument you are on, there is some very interesting questions to ask regarding this topic and there is still much to learn in the future.

Very true Tom, I have always wondered why people make things more complicated than it is... There is so much confusion out there, I feel I'm repeating myself to clients because they go away and come back to me with another argument, ive now incorporated mental focus into my programmes with clients... I'm a strong believer in getting your mind right and the weight loss will follow.

All in all, I think it was a good discussion but if it is to continue either the very low carb advocates will need to come up with better arguments and better evidence, or the topic will have to shift to exploring the merits of high - carb diets — a topic which the ancestral community hasn't spent much time discussing.

But I can't see how the argument that the ratio of amino acids is different can hold much validity - I don't think the ratio is very different for vegans and omnivores when you take into account our natural protein combining behavior over a period of a few meals.

So if primitive humans were getting this much fiber a day, that is a very strong argument that they weren't getting a substantial portion of their calories from zero fiber foods like meat or eggs.

Hardliners, despite their nationalities, political arguments and wars, regard and understand the world in very much the same way.

Last year's envelope flub was very much the cherry on top of a crystallised argument months in the making: La La Land v Moonlight.

In the post-MDGs moment, there might be need to rethink the approaches to tackling poverty and argument put forward by The Economist (June 1 - 7, 2013) is very much appealing, «poverty used to be a reflection of scarcity.

So in the end, I don't think we will see much movement here, but you have stimulated a very important argument.

He added: «There's an argument that you sometimes see that «a download is not equal to a lost sale, because that person wouldn't have bought it anyway», and there's varying evidence on that, but it's very much a static analysis of a dynamic problem, because if you normalise the practice of pirating books, you erode incentive for people to pay for them, so eventually, people who would have bought them stop doing so.»

Some would make the argument that investors would be better off in a buy and hold strategy that consist of very little trading, avoiding as much in trading commissions as possible.

There is also a very good argument to be made for the fact that humans need dogs just as much as they need us.