Not exact matches
Would
very much appreciate everyone's thoughts / comments / feedback /
criticism.
Trying to birth the ministry was so hard and I had so
much opposition, and for me as a woman in ministry, when I started 40 years ago, it was
very unheard of and unpopular... you got a lot of judgement and
criticism for it.
After all, this isn't the Protestantism that many of us grew up in, a Protestantism which answered to many of the harsh
criticisms contained in Leithart's essay last fall, «The End of Protestantism»: either militantly convinced that Rome is nothing but a synagogue of Satan, or complacently ignoring her
very existence, and also ignoring
much of the robust theology of classical Protestantism.
But worse yet, not only does it distort the historical record, this
criticism of Greek civilization also hides within itself a bad «faith resentment against the contemporary West,
very much including its reverence for the critical intellect:
The
very cost of mounting and moving so comprehensive a show (having closed in Chicago, it is now in Philadelphia and from there goes to Los Angeles and New York) makes it all the more remarkable that an artist who had generated so
much hostility among so many critics at the beginning of the decade in both the United States and Germany would have survived the firestorm of
criticism and receive solid support from such establishment stalwarts as the Lannan Foundation and the Ford Motor Company.
But Buchler, again like White - head, does
much more than find fault with traditional metaphysics — he elaborates an alternative system of categories.1 Because his alternative categorial scheme is
very different, the points Buchler makes in
criticism of traditional metaphysics are interestingly different from those made by Whitehead.
I agree that there is no point singleling out players for
criticism alhought I find it
very disappointing that our core of buffon + bbc tends to show way too
much respect and inferiority complex to certain players and teams particularly those from spain.
Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or
criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as
much as this man... it's the
very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane
The fact that our
very own
much maligned striker is ranking this high (even though this is an unscientific rating system) shows that
much of the abuse and
criticisms that the guy has received are illogical and mostly unfounded.
I was helped in this by a couple of phone calls; one from a
very eloquent certified nurse midwife at OHSU, the Oregon Health and Sciences University, who had tried to transfer a patient to one of our hospitals during labor and received so
much flak and
criticism and expletives over the phone and there was so
much overt hostility that she wound up not pursuing that transfer, which would have been a
very important transfer.
The plan's details were released on Thursday and Cuomo's
criticism of the proposal remained
very much the same from when only the outline was available.
You need to be
very thick skinned as people tend to have
much more forthright online presences so your work can often come in for hefty
criticism.
Which sounds
very much like a rebuttal of Espaillat's primary
criticism of Rangel, which is simply that he's been around too long, and by implication that he's too old, to be effective.
He argues that
much as fair
criticism is a vital part of good governance, he can not in his position as party founder focus his attention on consistently correcting the wrongs in another man's party while the foundation of his
very own party weakens.
«The media treatment of any politician over unsubstantiated allegations, be it David Cameron, me or anyone else, is wrong and too
much of our media is obsessed with personality politics, obsessed with personal
criticism of politicians and therefore detracting from
very serious issues around housing, living standards, jobs or world peace.
«It's a
very big organisation and I suspect that
much of this
criticism that you are saying about a crisis in the party actually comes from those who are nervous of the strength of the Labour Party at local level.»
The Kurokawa report's biggest
criticism is reserved for what it calls «the Japanese mindset» that meant the disaster was
very much «made in Japan».
Focusing
very much on what's onscreen, Monroe also shoots down some
criticisms leveled at his movie.
His penchant for comedy, a special highlight here involves a discussion of
criticism versus art, is still
very much present and welcoming.
As I said before, I have not seen
very many of your television shows or films before «Shaun of the Dead,»
much of this
criticism will be based on your works after 2004.
But one wonders if writer - director Paul King has consciously decided to avoid the
criticism Richard Curtis regularly receives for all - white casting; there are also
very decent cameos for Richard Ayoade, Sangeev Bhaskar and Meera Syal and
much diversity among the minor roles.Prettily made with some nifty animation and some
very enjoyable slapstick gags, Paddington 2 is ultimately an insidious advert for the capital.
I'm leaving the corps after my first year, and I
very much appreciate Mr. Rubenstein's healthy
criticisms of Teach for America.
Goodreads is sometimes a scary place for authors because there's a lot of room for potential tough love and
criticism, but with that comes with social media strategies that have so
much more potential for building your tribe with a
very captive audience.
At this juncture in time it seems almost redundant to criticise the Lego games for failing to innovate or change
very much in the formula, and yet it does remain a true and valid
criticism, so here we go; LEGO The Hobbit plays it safe, refining a couple of areas and adding a few new little mechanics, while infuriatingly still failing to fix problems that have plagued the series for years.
one of the reason (besides double standard) is that the KZ2 trailer is
very much ahead of its time when it came out, thus attracting all the attention (and
criticism).
If I have but one
criticism to bring forth, it's that the combat doesn't change
very much throughout the course of the game.
It's hardly
much of a
criticism, though, but does serve as a
very obvious nod to the game's mobile origins.
I fully agree that most game reviews are not
very well written, and there is not a base of
criticism for games that is adequately comparable to what exists for pretty
much every other entertainment medium.
I
very much agree with the
criticisms and the score.
One of the biggest
criticisms thrown the way of its Star Wars - themed multiplayer shooter, and one of the biggest hurdles it's faced since its announcement, is that it didn't feel
very much like Battlefront at all.
All
very much flavour of the month,
very much current or well known — which is not a
criticism, it just confirms the impression that the Venice Biennale, like art fairs, hoovers up and regurgitates what is hot and of the moment rather than having any profound insights.
Very much influenced by Joseph Beuys, and European Conceptualism, as well as American performance art — there was this enormous amount of awareness and self criticism, very rhetori
Very much influenced by Joseph Beuys, and European Conceptualism, as well as American performance art — there was this enormous amount of awareness and self
criticism,
very rhetori
very rhetorical.
Needless to say that's a
very serious
criticism of a fellow scientist, requiring a
much greater burden of proof than anything he's presented so far.
There are
very real
criticisms that can be made of the solar forcing time - series he uses, and of course, of the cherry picking of specific time - series without mentioning that correlations to others (such as the global mean) are
very low, but even accepting all that, there is a
much more fundamental problem.
I'd
much rather, when all was said and done, be remembered as one of the ones with the valid
criticisms, but to err is human, and to find a response that leads to a temporary cessation of stupidity is as good for the
very bright as for the
very dim, if it has a more general application.
This site, with Pierre Gosselin, and Kenneth Richard must be
very close to target now, as there is
much criticism occurring on other sites, especially on this topic.
But there are (at least) two other problems — Keith Briffa points out that the
very strong trend in the 20th century calibration period accounts for
much of the success of our calibration and makes it unlikely that we would be able be able to reconstruct such an extraordinary period as the 1990s with
much success (I may be mis - quoting him somewhat, but that is the general thrust of his
criticism).
That lack of openness and transparency is the
very reason they've had to bear so
much criticism for their failings to date, whereas an open door, approachable policy from the
very beginning would have saved them
much scientific and political embarrassment in the long run.
It's funny seeing the
criticisms of Monckton here, as they are all unsubstantiated or ad hominem or refer to blog posts that attack a
very minor point in a
much larger argument.
The problem is that
much of the
criticism of the kind «see here is proof that AGW is bunk» is not
very rational, or at the
very least leaves out the bigger context of all the evidence in favour of AGW (as if that suddenly magically disappeared).
I would
very much welcome feedback, suggestions, collaboration, and constructive
criticism.