Very much skepticism has been directed towards climate science.
Not exact matches
I think there's going to be too
much speculation driving these statistics, even given individual cases, that any conclusions deserve a
very high degree of
skepticism.
For now, though,
skepticism is
very much merited.
I personally published what was wrong (with) my own original 1971 cooling hypothesis a few years later when more data and better models came along and further analysis showed [anthropogenic global warming] as the
much more likely... In fact, for me that is a
very proud event — to have discovered with colleagues why our initial assumptions were unlikely and better ones reversed the conclusions — an early example of scientific
skepticism in action in climatology.»
On the other hand, if your
skepticism is motivated by ideology or group identity, I
very much doubt that anything you read here will change your mind.