One of the most malodorous and disreputable aspects of American jurisprudence is the way laws intended to have
very narrow application metastasize to target almost anyone the government is minded to stick it to.
Not exact matches
It has been relegated to many
narrow use cases involving pattern recognition and prediction (some of which are
very valuable and useful, such as improving cancer detection, identifying financial risk and fraud, and other high performance computing
applications), but it has not developed a general «understanding» of human interactions, human emotions, speech patterns and human responses to information.
More updates... So after a
very thorough investigation / research — my daughter had
narrowed her college search /
applications down to 10 schools.
The Home Secretary is sitting next to one of the world experts on the Official Secrets Act, who will be able to remind her that in 1989, almost exactly 20 years ago to this day, the then Conservative Government amended the Official Secrets Act to restrict the
application of the criminal law to a
very narrow band of Government information.
I have tried the keyboard in the Word
application and it is pretty good, even in portrait mode, which is
very narrow, I managed to type without typos.
This method gave
very variable results, and no conclusions could be drawn from comparisons of deep,
narrow banding with a more dispersed, wide band
application.
There are
very narrow exceptions for inaccuracies in citizenship
applications that can lead to revocation of citizenship, but a failure to disclose in a citizenship
application the fact of having purportedly committed a non-violent, regulatory offense (i.e. one that doesn't harm anyone), as a 12 year old, that does not result in a juvenile adjudication (i.e. conviction), would not be grounds for revocation of someone's U.S. citizenship.
In R (on the
application of Green) v The City of Westminster Magistrates» Court [2007] EWHC 2785 (Admin)(05 December 2007)(blogged here), a Divisional Court of the English High Court held that only a
very narrow version of the common law crime of blasphemy is compatible with Article 10, and found that Jerry Springer — The Opera was not blasphemous.
The court
narrowed the grounds on which such
applications will succeed; stating that there needs to be a «
very good reason» to extend time.