The very next sentence of the opinion states, «The district court found no such infringement, and we agree.»
Richard, you should have included
the very next sentence after your quotation: «You may be pointing out that AGW is a non-falsifiable theory, but that's much different than saying the theory doesn't use measurements.»
But in
the very next sentence, it is Bush's «distaste for stem - cell research» that raises public suspicion, seemingly with the effect of increasing the prevalence of creationism.
Edit 3:
The very next sentence says, «This conclusion ignores the long - lasting, incredibly powerful greenhouse gas discovered 9 December 2013 by University of Toronto researchers: perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) is 7,100 times more powerful than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and it persists hundreds of years in the atmosphere.»
Perhaps this confusion explains
the very next sentence in Wegman (emphasis added in this and following quotes):
He talks about our failure to «take action on climate change,» says the Great Barrier Reef may be approaching «the point of no return,» and in
the very next sentence refers to «that final point where it will be too late to save the Great Barrier Reef.»
I thought I might be misreading that part, but
the very next sentence rejects the IPCC claim that the human contribution to global warming is just «substantial» (the cowards).
Me (in
the very next sentence):
Physics, you blockquoted a sentence from the post and misunderstood / misinterpreted its thrust in
your very next sentence.
Of course, I disagree with David on
his very next sentence, where he asserts it doesn't matter what scientists say or how we say it.
Funny that such evidence is in
the very next sentence; almost as if those taking it out of context did so in order to deliberately distort its nature.
But in
the very next sentence, he says that modern scientists still think the same about the future... ie.
You could try quoting
the very next sentence to them: «The most we can expect to achieve is the prediction of the probability distribution of the system's future possible states by the generation of ensembles of model solutions.»
Calm down random person asking me these questions, the answer is coming in
the very next sentence.
However, in
the very next sentence he adds, «If he wants to be shrewd he can look for the ever - present bargain opportunities in individual securities.»
But Jones»
very next sentence rewards the reader with an unassailable understanding:
On one hand you say it has no e-mail and in
the very next sentence you say that it has e-mail via Bridge.
Then in
the very next sentence, «Indie authors and self - published authors who claim they are real authors makes me laugh.»
In
the very next sentence, he points out that the MET project has two stated premises guiding its work — that, whenever feasible, teacher evaluations should be based «to a significant extent» on student test score gains; and that other components of evaluations (such as observations), in order to be considered valid, must be correlated with test score gains.
Then in
the very next sentence it states that there was NO relationship between c - section rates and intrapartum stillbirth rates.
let me get this straight, in one sentence you say you are tired of being perceived as racist and or intolerent, and
the very next sentence you think all Muslims should leave!
That interpretation ignores
the very next sentence: «It is also the judgment of a wisdom which uses what in the temporal world is mere wreckage.
But the bubble of plausibility is burst with
the very next sentence in Whitehead's text, which, unfortunately, was neglected by Cobb.
There are also three paragraphs inserted into chapter 6 on «The Nineteenth Century» (SMW 153 - 55), indicated by the fact that «these individual enduring entities» in
the very next sentence refers back to the final sentence just before the inserted material.2 Later new insights about eternal objects and God were added in the two metaphysical chapters, using the new concept of «actual occasion» for the first time.
I like how in you're very first sentence, you yourself lash out at a group of people who's perspective you don't understand, without defending your religion at all, then in
the very next sentence say you'll «stop here for fear of retaliation for defending your religion».
Hartshorne's
very next sentences state that «merely rejecting p is negative and rather vague as to what the rejection positively imports.
Not exact matches
But
very occasionally the Echo thinks it hears «Alexa» and responds nonsensically to whatever
sentence comes
next.
The
very next (last)
sentence says, «eating good fats does not clog the liver and does not promote LDL oxidation.»
Joe in the service Dpt hung up on me when I called back Lisa was
very rude by not even letting get my
sentence out be saying that the
next appointment is two weeks out and then making excuses for everyone when I asked why I was put on hold for 8 min for some one to sch an appointment.
The majority of posts at WUWT cause me to mutter FU under my breath after the
very first
sentence and just skip on to the
next inane post.
Rather, as the
very opening
sentence of the summary explains, they posited a «a reduced warming trend during the
next 10 years».
While para. 10 does specify that Mr. Hounjet saw «Lolita Porn» and «Lolita XXX» icons, the last
sentence of that
very paragraph perpetuates the impression that actual child pornography (rather than links) were seen: It asserts that when Mr. Hounjet arrived the
next day «all the child porn off the computer was gone».
Rather than having a reasonable expectation of a jail
sentence shortened by some future prisoner swap, he now faces the
very real possibility of a death
sentence the
next time his co-conspirators engage in terrorism.