Much of the science they are trying to debunk is
VERY OLD science, not the updated more accurate sciences, such as their attack on carbon dating... you do realize that we have updated the science well past the AiG website representation of the science, right?
Not exact matches
Well, if it comes down to holy books, the
oldest of the scriptures — the Rigveda of India has a take which is
very different and much more in accordance with what
science is finding:
This destroys not just the foundations of
science and everydayliving but also the
very heart of the Faith as revealed in both the
Old Testament and the New.
They do not know that at this
very moment scientific thinkers have abandoned that
older mechanical picture of nature and have come to see, even to insist, that
science does not exhaustively describe the whole range of experience nor everything in the world of nature.
In challenging the multiple migration model, the new genome data, published online today in
Science, suggest that Europeans today are the descendants of a
very old, interconnected population of hunter - gatherers that had already spread throughout Europe and much of central and western Asia by 36,000 years ago.
«These are
very old fish, imagine these are like your grandmothers and grandfathers,» says Scott Hinch, a salmon ecologist at the U.B.C. who co-authored the
Science paper.
Some of my
old friends in the
sciences are
very worried about the biotech companies and how their intrusion into academic
science skews the agenda.
In 2006, Dobrzyn learned that the Nencki Institute was running a competition to hire Poland's best young biologists — demonstrating, Dobrzyn says, that it's «one of the
very few Polish institutes trying to change this
very old - fashioned way that
science is organized.»
Braithwaite adds, «small biotech is really fueled by innovation,... so it's
very important to be getting experience in techniques that are really the cutting edge of
science and not just the
old standard techniques.»
Derek did actually leave off some of that that I'm
very proud of that I would like to mention, partly because I'm heard by the
old giant, is that I founded an organization called
Science Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized que
Science Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on
science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized que
science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized questions.
The
old real - estate adage about what's really important proved applicable to astrophysics as astronomers used the sharp radio «vision» of the National
Science Foundation's
Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) to pinpoint the distance to a pulsar.
Location, location, and location: the
old real - estate adage about what's really important proved applicable to astrophysics as astronomers used the sharp radio vision of the National
Science Foundation's
Very Long Baseline Array to pinpoint the distance to a pulsar.
On June 29, 2011, a team of astronomers using the European Southern Observatory's
Very Large Telescope and other telescopes around the world announced their detection of ULAS J1120 +0641, which is the
oldest known quasar measured thus far with a redshift of z ~ 7.08 and which indicates that its light has taken around 12.9 billion years to reach Earth from just 770 million years after the Big Bang (ESO
science release).
Modern
science actually seems to support
very old - fashioned milk in this case.
A plethora of new and
old science supports cholesterol as a
very vital substance for creating hormones, producing vitamin D from sunlight, cell walls, and brain and nervous system tissue.
Hello frnds my name is Raj hussain 23 year
old from India at this time present in oman working in sattelite company I have copleted diploma in d.n.y.s. (doctory in naturopthy and yog
science) and
very soon i am going to c..
Dating sites for 18 year
olds I was in the
sciences which meant
very few women.
As in the world of gamification you can never stand still because your product gets
old very quickly, we are working now on developing
Science games directly in English Language, because it is a subject in the Community of Madrid and other parts of Spain directly taught in that language and that is part of the bilingual curriculum that schools are offering right now.
There's a
very old expression in computer
science that applies here.
Upon recommendation from our vet, we started Vetri -
Science senior vitamin therapy for our 11 year
old - her next set of blood work ~ 6 months later showed normal iron levels - our dogs have always been
very active so this was the insurance that our Bella wouldn't feel the fatigue or intolerance to our daily exercise and activity!
My daughter is 21 years
old and presently studying towards Veterinary
Science through UNISA, she love nature
very much, during school holidays she used to work (partime) at Pretoria Zoo.
But in no case should a reporter who wishes to portray with accuracy the debates about global warming, present a minority view unbacked by
science and promoted by businesses with a small,
old dog in a
very tough dog fight, as equivalent to hard
science from unbiased scientists with no economic interest in anything but getting the facts and predictions right.
Re # 513 (John Mashey): I'm all for social
science research (with or without quotation marks), but it seems
very likely to me that some of these posters are bright 12 year
olds playing games, some are paid provocateurs, and some wouldn't tell you the truth to save their lives (and maybe a couple are sincere and don't know how to use an index or search engine).
How could guys that once put their
very lives in the hands of
science be so dumb about it as they get
old?
Trying to provide a summary statement for
science which is less than a decade
old and still
very much the subject of discussion is foolishness.
There is far wider scope than just the «deleted emails» for the new House of Commons Select Committee on
Science and Technology to revisit the UEA inquiries, as well as the
old Committee's
very hasty and inconclusive inquiry, and particularly to question the people involved: Acton, Davies, Russell and Oxburgh.
Viewed from 2014, however, that two - year -
old Prussian post is
very prescient - except in respect of the bit about how «Mann has arranged humiliation for himself and a public discredit to climate
science».
So even though this is all
old hat for regulars, repeating the discussion occasionally is
very important because the primary goal for all of us is the advancement of
science and the education of those who have been messed up by our education system.
Here I linked two
very recent reports (both less than one month
old) from the National Academy of
Science (and the Royal Society of England) and the American Association for the Advancement of
Science that state clearly what they think about AGW.
Cyclomania is a
very old fashioned
science — not one that can be all that persuasive.
I know that some climate
science / activists aren't «happy» with such mitigants (and often only work on the warming ones rather than the cooling ones), but it's interesting to see how the temperature record is currently reflecting them all being out on the table as we get closer to leaving the lower bound of 95 % confidence on a
very expensive climate modeling effort that is hardly
very old.
assuming what you say about skeptics changing topic as you describe is accurate, and at this point I do we are talking about data that is less than 200 years
old, out of which extraordinary claims are made as to how that data relates to distant past and future trends tough sell assuming that all adjustments to the data are scientifically sound, It is
very difficult for me to believe that measurements that have gone through so many iterations can be trusted to.0 and.00 in most other
sciences, I doubt they would tough sell (the photo of the thermometer is downright funny) in terms of goal post moving I observe predicted heat being re-branded as «missing» a prediction of no snow re-branded as more snow a warming world re-branded to a «warm, cold, we don't know what to expect» world topped off with suggestions that one who thinks the above has some sort of psychological disorder extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence especially when you are teaching children that their world is endangered
This aspect of
science is actually
very old hat.
Remember also we are talking about a 1990 paper; anyone relying on a 20 - year -
old paper that has not stood up to subsequent follow - up studies is doing
very poor
science.
Somewhat fortuitously given the long list of special interest groups which Dr Carter has affiliations with, he feels that the standard practice in
science of disclosing where funding for research comes from is «a
very quaint and
old fashioned practice».