Not exact matches
The danger there is that you have these
policy reactions to a couple of companies that have not handled things
very well that could end up having unintended consequences
people aren't thinking of now.
There is room here for activist public
policy aimed at assisting
people as soon as they become unemployed — including
very fast interventions to have resumés updated, interview skills improved and much shorter - duration job training programs (rather than ones that last months or years).
On Monday, two powerful conservative leaders in the House declared the blueprint unacceptable because it relies on giving
people refundable tax credits to purchase insurance — a
policy mechanism that, in a
very rough sense, resembles Obamacare's subsidies to buy mandated health coverage (and is therefore being slammed by conservatives as just another entitlement program).
If there is no
policy or, better yet, no measurement of actual performance and follow up accordingly, self - interest is perpetuated and complacency is allowed continue, by the
very people who should be leading by example.
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with
people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new
policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What
people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is
very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?
However, few
people actually need these
policies, which are
very expensive and restrict their death benefit to less than $ 25,000.
«If premiums are paid properly and the
policy is monitored through the years, permanent life can be a
very beneficial financial asset that can help supplement a
person's overall retirement and estate planning,» Aita said.
That is what is expected of me because
people —
very naturally — associate central banks with monetary
policy.
But, we also criticize
people who adhere to the dogma — of Christianity, of Islam, of Hindu tradition — when the actions are far removed from what the «
policies» of the respective texts dictate (e.g. love thy neighbor, but act badly to others, specifically non-Christians *), or when the «
policies» are adhered to
VERY closely and make no sense in today's day and age (e.g. homosexuality is a sin).
Given the presence of Naomi Klein at
People and Planet, and the fact Pope Francis has already delivered an extensive message on climate change with his encyclical, it is possible the meeting will be much more
policy - focussed, calling for
very specific and detailed changes.
When she was Ambassador to the United Nations and President Bush had appointed me to a commission examining U.S.
policy toward that organization, she came across in meetings as a
very capable and no - nonsense sort of
person.
Those who have followed the debate over same - sex marriage understand
very clearly that law and culture ought to work together to promote and preserve families and communities; we should apply the same vigor to strengthening economic
policies that make it easier for
people not to sin.
The Bolivian experience provides a lesson hyperinflation - with the effect of daily pauperisation for the
very large majority of the population - can serve to have
people «accept» brutal neo-liberal
policy measures, while preserving democratic forms.
``...
very strong politically correct and left - wing revisionist history attitude or tone that's also Anti-American (especially a vague charge against «U.S. foreign
policy»), and strong anti-capitalist elements... blasphemy, implied urinating, vomiting, scatological humor, and comments on breast feeding and sexual parts of
people's bodies; light brief violence includes beating on car window and trying to damage car, man comically shoves
people off a stage, man burns books; sexual content includes homosexual references, implied adultery with a pregnancy out of wedlock, talk about a priest raping boy in the past, a giant condom balloon placed on church steeple, references to real condoms, implied fornication; upper male nudity, man wears a dress; alcohol use and drunkenness; smoking and marijuana use depicted, including eating marijuana brownies; and, strong miscellaneous immorality includes lying, stealing, revenge, rebellion, dysfunctional family portrayed, father is a pothead and a drinker and lives in a trailer»
I may not like many of Obama's
policies and failed promises - actually, I do not and I did not vote for him - but I hold him in
very high regard as a man who tends to speak well of other
people (yes, he's said some careless things occasionally, but only occasionally), who clearly loves and respects his family, who tries to take the high road in dealings with others.
Soviets killed, or by neglect or bad
policy caused the deaths of a lot of
people — relatively
very few of them because of their religion.
So what we have is public
policy being made on a lie and declared truth by the
very people that would benefit the most.
The lay
people do not handle a
very abrupt change in doctrine, therefore incremental
policy has been the conscious strategy of the the Brethren since the middle of the last century when the Church embraced corporate philosophies and procedures.
To enforce, in the name of ecological sustainability,
policies that violate the sense of justice of the
people involved introduces an element that is
very likely to make those
policies unsustainable.24
24 / The program
policy of the Commission must also be based on the premise that mankind consists of many diverse cultures, most of which represent in actual numbers
very large numbers of
persons.
The effects of this
policy are still
very much seen today, as areas that used to be inside the red line are still occupied predominantly by
people of color.
Tom Minnery, Focus on the Family's senior vice president for government and public
policy told CNN that Obama won't get the evangelical vote because «evangelicals are
people who take Bible interpretation
very seriously, and the sort of speech [Obama] gave shows that he is worlds away in the views of evangelicals.»
Nance, why is it you guys on the Left always think that having an insurance
policy against government tyranny is a stupid idea, when the majority of
peoples throughout the world are THIS
VERY DAY being oppressed by their governments, and have absolutely no way to defend themselves against false imprisonment, torture, and overall tyranny.
We are witnessing a
very major
policy shift, with partisans on all sides making high - octane moral noises, and yet with few
people fessing up to what is really happening.
Regardless of one's position on American foreign
policy, I think
very few
people would consider eradicating Islam to be the responsibility of our country.
Sexually repressed
people, usually
very devout often try to push their brand of sex education into public
policy.
now wengers absurd transfer
policy «is down to you
people»... seriously krish n`chips... the acolytes of the delusional one are beginning to sound even more of a parody than the master himself... walcott is a
very very average player with one good season in 12 years at the club... the fact that wenger hasnt sold him is part of the sorry state of our club and the idea that this can be blamed on fans who want to see us back challenging for top trophies is frankly offensive
«Get the
very,
very best
people to work for the Browns,» Lerner tells
Policy.
Incredible that wenge» rs transfer
policy isn't understood yet,
very slowly and with some caution
people are seeing improvement and potential, we are getting better whether you like it or not.
The thing that makes me laugh is the fact that, some Arsenal fans will call Chelsea's and Man United and City Fan's plastic or refer to them as «rent boys», because they celebrate success that in all honesty have just been bought, but the irony in that sentiment is those
very same
people will moan about how «we don't spend enough» and grow impatient over Arsenal spending
policies....
«I suspect that
very few
people will be overly thrilled with this
policy, and I suspect that
very few
people will be unbelievably disappointed, and that suggests it's probably about right,» said Michael Lipsitz, board president.
I graduated from a small high school, where the principal was
very much interested in the poor and the hungry, and in public
policy; he taught us how to be an advocate for the helpless
people in our community and in our state.»
«I'm quietly confident, in a non-complacent way, that the
people who are flirting with the Greens, a large number of them will end up voting Labour - for positive reasons, because we've got radical
policies on the environment, we've got
very good
policies on addressing inequality, the housing crisis, the NHS.
President underscored two economic pillars with emphasis on jobs and promised to introduce new legislations and
policies, which will be intended to achieve sustainable economic growth, develop and expand agriculture, and address our
very large infrastructure deficit, with particular emphasis on road construction and the provision of affordable and adequate electricity for all our
people.
At the
very least the proposed changes in Greater Manchester — which obviously go a lot wider than the system of government — have all the hall marks of a
policy being made on - the - hoof, behind closed doors, by small groups of like - minded
people — just the sort of ingredients identified by King and Crewe which lead to monumental blunders.
Also using such phrases as «Europe's habit of ghettoizing
people whom they consider to be beneath them» brings us right up to the
very edge of defamy and violation of our be nice
policy.
Since US electorate is considered dumb cattle
people with limited attention span for intricacies of
policy, the campaigns strongly prefer to hammer only a few
very specific messages / bullet points / themes.
The problem is that translating these abstract, widely accepted economic principles into actual concrete
policy basically means turning against the country's exporting class, the
very people who have been driving — and profiting handsomely from — China's economic emergence.
This would have
very little effect on national elections, but a huge effect on local ones; there are an awful lot of
people who commute into major cities, use many local services, but have no influence over any local
policies where they work.
Most
people are just not
very interested in the details of
policy.»
And a loan agreement that imposes structural adjustment against the wishes of the domestic political class (not to mention the
people) is barely worth the paper it's written on, and is certainly a
very poor predictor of what
policy changes we'll actually see over the coming years.
The Progressive presidents advocated a
very interventionist foreign
policy, since they were motivated by the desire to help
people as much as possible, even
people abroad.
Positions are chosen and
policies are made through a process involving a
very large number of
people, from the individual voters on up to representatives, senators, party elites, and eventually the presidential candidates.
It's
very hard to define «Right Wing» today, especially since most
people referred to as «Right Wing» today not only have nothing in common with the historical origin of the term (French Monarchists after French Revolution), but don't have much common politically with each other aside from opposing some or all of the
policies labeled «Left Wing», and even that for a wide variety of reasons.
This might just be the working man's Budget: a potpourri (that's not
very working man's) Bombay Mix of
policies which will appeal to those distant creatures, Ordinary
People.
«When the British
people look at some of these
policies they're going to say that he [leader Nick Clegg] was
very telegenic [in last week's leaders» debate]... but he's not for me.
We are
very confident that the implementation of the one village one dam and the one district one factory
policies will not only create numerous jobs for the youth but also improve the living standards of majority of
people in the Northern region who are predominantly farmers.
«It was
very clear that there was a room full of hundreds of
people who were feeling similarly frustrated that they weren't hearing the support and imaginative
policies that they wanted to hear from the other parties.
If you tell faith groups that they are the right
people to deliver public
policy you are
very close to telling them that they have a special right to form public
policy.
«When I hear ministers bashing bureaucrats, or declaring their departments are not fit for purpose, I wish they'd have the decency to admit that
very often it's their
policies that are at fault, not the
people who work for them,» he will said.