Not exact matches
At the
very least, controversial
emails or other communications from high - profile or powerful people that are disclosed publicly — no matter how they are obtained — are considered in the court of
public opinion where no rules of admissibility apply.
In an
emailed statement, the company says it feels strategically sound: «We feel
very confident around our product and growth strategy, it's not something we divulge in
public settings — but our board and investors are
very happy with where we're taking the company strategically.»
A pitch deck that you use for in - person
public speaking and an investor deck that you send by
email are
very different.
Obviously
email addresses and / or phone numbers and / or usernames have to be stored (so that they can be associated with
public keys), and the
very act of connecting two accounts will generate logs of who was communicating with whom and when, and often from where (through IP addresses).
There has been a lot of finger pointing involved with this issue — especially as the subject of preserving
emails and making them
public has become a
very hot topic, thanks to the controversy over Hillary Clinton's use of a private server based in her Westchester County home to conduct
public business while she was secretary of state.
Much of a campaign's online outreach will take place in the
very public venues of blogs, Facebook, YouTube, MySpace and Twitter, but politicians and staff can also reach out behind the scenes, for instance sending
emails or Facebook messages to selected bloggers, Twitterers and activists, usually in the hope of creating connections that will lead to more
public affirmations of support.
I've argued before that corporations are better targets for
email campaigns than are members of Congress, both because companies are
very sensitive to the
public perception of their brands and because they receive so many fewer
emails than elected officials (we've managed to swamp Congress).
Most of us on the team have our
email addresses available to the
public on our twitter bios, so it should have been
very easy for them to find!»
Bill Mahoney, a researcher at the New York
Public Interest Group, said the
emails and other communications that may come with a donor's check could prove to be
very interesting.
But I know you have your
very good reasons for being among the 98 percent of the population that shuns
public transportation: • You can read, check
email, send text messages, or catch a few winks while you're swerving into oncoming traffic and pedestrians • You have built - in motivation for stopping at Wendy's for celebration takeout, given that you haven't had to walk more than nine consecutive steps the entire day • You feel good about the copious burning of hydrocarbons, which is creating valuable new beachfront property • You get to trade hand gestures and occasional gunfire with fellow traffic jammers.
Businesses in the
public and private sectors teach people to recognize phishing, but those efforts often fail or don't work for
very long because the training ignores users» habits and instead focuses exclusively on how users process information, says Vishwanath, whose latest research on
email habits and phishing outcomes is published in the Journal of Computer - Mediated Communication.
I've always known that I can
email documents to my Kindle, and I have found it a
very easy way to get
public domain books onto the platform - just download them and then
email them to the device.
You have sent out thousands of
emails and continue a
very public campaign, despite him telling you to stop and that YOU are the one that is hurting him much more than anyone else.
I connected with an employee from the Communications, Education, and
Public Affairs Department who sent a
very direct, and simple
email, «The pavilion is located near our cafeteria.
So yeah,
email me the essay, but I notice that when he discussed his whiz - bang post-partum science in
public and was asked these
very questions, he declined to answer.
It only reached the
public when the
email was stolen and published widely by the
very people who complain of it.
Scientists who were mostly trying to do their jobs studying the science and explaining it to the
public — and yes some of them are imperfect human beings who react imperfectly — brought on themselves the illegal hacking of
emails that were then utterly misrepresented by the
very anti-scientific blogs she seems to champion.
I also spoke (via
email) with the mother of a 13 - year - old girl that went to (
public) school with Halle up until she was adopted last month, and she said her daughter smiled
very big when she asked her about Halle, and said she is a «
very good girl».