Sentences with phrase «very question also»

As it so happens, that very question also came up recently, and the answer?

Not exact matches

The (hopefully direct) answers to this very simply - sounding question could give a window into presidential poise, but also into how the White House aspirants may choose to balance security with civil liberties.

And I also think that it can be destructive and a very bad idea to ask yourself a different question: Is what I'm being asked to do in the moment the highest and best use of my time?

Wariness about Lucent, Rite Aid, Raytheon, Tyco, and a host of other big names has left investors not only rattled but also questioning the very integrity of the financial reporting system.

And critics are also quick to point out that the promised benefits to Main Street of Trump - style tax cuts — faster job growth, higher wages and a boost to the middle class — are very much in question.

In a sometimes heated exchange with reporters shouting questions, Trump said, «You also had people that were very fine people on both sides.»

It is also a great strategy for dismissing an argument or a speaker — in other words, why should Trump have to answer Kelly's often very pointed questions when she is clearly unstable?

Shareholders may also raise questions over the very high interest rates the bank charges to financially strapped customers who resort to so - called payday loans, which are in the sights of state attorneys general.

That has made a lot of investors very, very rich, but it has also begun to raise questions.

As Hemingway wrote in the Sun Also Rises, there's a very simple answer to the question, «How did you go bankrupt?»

But just as Harper is de-emphasizing some of his past comments, the Liberals are also de-emphasizing their stand on private care within the public system, as we saw recently when Health Minister Pierre Pettigrew did a very public about - face on this very question.

These are all the kinds of things that HR managers and talent developers obsess over, and also the sorts of questions people ask themselves when they're deciding between job offers: Should I work at Company A, where I'd have better benefits but a worse commute, or Company B, which does important work but doesn't pay very well?

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

I also came to understand that one of the best things I could do for a client was to simply listen to what they had to say and that with a very few questions, a client would often tell me their most important needs and wants.

Alongside fiscal, legal and financial questions, the very personal aims and values of the entrepreneur and family members are also of prime concern.

Although he and I find ourselves in different places on the questions of the hour, he and I were also a bit surprised to see each other struggling to articulate a very similar posture towards the questions.

I tend to do that from time to time... Also, your reminder to not make «questioning traditional views» my god was very timely.

Madison's implicit assumption, and that of the entire tradition of religious toleration until the last few decades, however, was that religious diversity and conflict would involve competing sects that differ on some important questions of doctrine and practice but nonetheless share in common a basic Judeo - Christian orientation that is also, in very broad terms, our society's implicit civil religion.

The development of a new philosophy of science which radically questions the earlier mechanical - materialistic world - view within which classical modern science worked and also the search for a new philosophy of technological development and struggle for social justice which takes seriously the concern for ecological justice, are very much part of the contemporary situation.

I am very happy to be here because this meeting takes place at a very opportune moment and also because it is necessary to question the prevailing model of globalisation which is extremely destructive for the smallest and the weakest in our society and particularly for the small farmers.

«He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much,» is made more specific by the question.

mind you, I am also going through a very hard time right now with pregnancy and am very physically weak and sick... she has done this to other people before too... I was taken aback by her questions.

The question of missionary encounter with non-Christian cultures and truth claims is also, as it is inevitably said, very complex.

Another element of it is the contemporary Zeitgeschichte which is accessible to us only through the very fauible and fuzzy tools of literary and archaeological history, aided but also called into question by the ancillary disciplines of linguistics, literary analysis, anthropology, etc..

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

The considerations we have been urging in connection with the Lord's Supper apply also to the very difficult questions which every pastor meets in considering what words to use in the counseling experience.

The recent revelation that Mars Hill Church in Seattle paid an outside company to boost sales of its pastor's books has raised questions not simply about personal integrity but also about the very culture of American Evangelicalism.

It is clear from the start, therefore, in an ontology and general metaphysical philosophy of man, that the very question of a possible derivation of spirit from matter has no meaning, because that would amount to attempting to derive what is logically and ontologically prior from what is in both respects posterior, and to imply that what is earlier in temporal succession must ipso facto also be the ontological ground of what in space and time is later and more material.

At the very same time that it has become clear that the theistic question can not possibly be discussed as a merely empirical question, it has also become clear, on secular philosophical grounds as well as religious, that contingency and relativity can be as readily predicated of ultimate reality as necessity and absoluteness.

and then, there were also a very few thoughts or questions posted....

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Mr. Blake, the answer is very simple but also very truly spiritual few would not even attempt to question.

Others were restored by Rabbi Akiba.35 Besides the manifest intent of providing a rationalization for the exegetical program of the rabbinic scholars, this tradition also reflects awareness of the problem of forgetfulness of those very questions and their answers on which full human life depends, and the continual need, by means of exegesis, to seek their recovery for contemporary life.

That this question is not formulated is by no means under all circumstances a sign of undeveloped thinking or of an immature, childish understanding of human existence; it can also be the sign of a very different interpretation of human life which is the reverse of childish.

But I have also tried to show that, in Christianity as in no other universal religion (with very minor exceptions), there has rarely been a question about this.

We must also at the very start leave on one side the question whether Socrates or the New Testament is right.

Admittedly, these questions reflect a very limited spiritual aptitude; but they also suggest that whether or not there is some spiritual existence after death, it will have absolutely nothing to do with life as we know it here and now.

In movements for liberation from oppression, the question has been always raised not only in terms of use or misuse, but also in terms of the very nature of power.

I believe a lot of questionable doctrinal ideas also slipped in — with very little scriptural open - ness on the questions — you accept the doctrines or you leave the church.

I would encourage you to read «Surprised by Joy», and to also read GK Chesterton's «Orthodoxy», which also examines these questions in a very broad sense and then leads to how Chesterton eventually came to believe in Christianity.

Also, in a letter to Mark Barr concerning the possibility of being offered a post at Harvard, Whitehead says the post would be very attractive because it would provide him the opportunity of developing in systematic form his «ideas on Logic, the Philosophy of Science, Metaphysics, and some more general questions, half philosophical and half practical, such as Education» (ANW - 2 134).

To answer your question — As someone who has been extensively mentored by people who are very gifted in inner healing and as one who also administers pastoral counseling, I believe that I've become perceptive to things that might not be aware to others.

It is probable that over and above his intentions, the Pisan scientist's discovery also made it possible to go back in time, prompting questions about the very origins of the cosmos

But close attention to the complex interplay of linguistic properties can also beg some of the very questions such interplay is meant to raise.

We also question other Easum claims: that worship music must always be upbeat and animated if it is to be «culturally relevant»; that classical music in general is stodgy and fossilized; that religious words guarantee genuinely religious music as long as the music is likable; and that music can be treated simply as a «package» that contains the gospel message instead of as an art that embodies and interprets the gospel message by its structure and by the very way it sounds.

I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by other departments of the government.

In the liberation movements from oppressive powers the question of power has been always raised not only in terms of use or misuse of the power, but also in terms of the very nature of the power.

These are very topical questions, if you follow, for example, the thesis of the German writer Sloterdijk, who also speaks of the «human zoo» and of a «new humanity» seen in the light of genetics.

I am not an impulsive person, and I had many questions and also some serious stumbling blocks, like the role of women in Mormonism (which I'll get to below) and what I saw as a very troubling racist history in the religion's not - so - recent past.

This is also a very important question.