There's also very much a general sentiment in society that natural = better, even amongst usually
very rational people.
Not exact matches
People (on both sides) are so busy screaming at each other that
rational conversation and discussion about this
very difficult scenario keeps getting pushed to the side.
The problem is that
very few
people what to have this
rational discussion — they want to have an emotional arguement and play a game of «my god is better / kinder / bigger / badder than your god.
These are the
very people that we should be taking OUT of the gene pool, so that future generations might be more intelligent and
rational.
I come from a family of
very logical,
rational people who are also religious, though not at all fanatical.
More prevalent and more insidious is the fact that just war discourse deceives sincere
people by the
very nature of its claim to base moral discernment upon the facts of the case and on universally accessible
rational principles.
Before telling me, like most christians do, that I don't know what I speak of, do note that as a Recovering christian I have a
very good idea as to what I speak of and any
rational minded
person see's the belief for the true horror it is.
@ huh — It is
very easy for a
rational thinking
person to see the logic in my statement — they might not agree, but there is logic.
We
rational secular
people should be scared,
very scared of these fear mongerers.
This definition of reason is significant, because if willingness to believe is written into the
very conception of reason, then the
rational person is the one who exercises the proper amount of faith, and not the one who eschews faith altogether.
And so, almost eight - hundred years after Boëthius, Aquinas also defines the
person in the
very same way: «an individual substance of a
rational nature.»
Some
people have even asked if he has surpassed James as the best player in the league, like this
very rational column from CBS Sports» Matt Moore — and other, less
rational proclamations on Twitter.
He's a
very principled,
rational, confident
person, and he, honestly, he doesn't like to read things like that.
«I think it is
very,
very dangerous when
people who call themselves community leaders make some assumption that somehow that there's a
rational connection between these two things.»
Although not as common for guys to hear, the old adage that meeting
people online is dangerous may be true if you're a 13 year old but if you're a
rational adult who takes basic, common sense precautions, you have
very little to worry about.
They
very crafty and know the power of emotional strength
people put into online relationship — unfortunately the
rational part of the users brain is somehow overruled by the need to be loved, and this is where vulnerability takes place.
I'm 5» 2», 105 lbs, attractive, outgoing,
very happy
person,
rational, understanding, concern and care about others, sharing and loving to myself and others, live a heathy lifestyle, respect myself and others, like a man who respect ladies completely, I'm looking for a companionship, best friend...
However, this does make the question of risk tolerance more confusing - I will refuse (as any
rational person) even
very tiny risk for poor Sharpe, and I would strongly consider even
very large risk if Sharpe is good.
ps fans have been in the mud long after ps3 realease right along with 360 fans, the 1 year to 7 is laughable I could easily show soooooo much trolling from ps fans all last gen just as easily as you could show some from Xbox fans so just stop the BS, especially when this
very site by any
rational person would be admittedly skewed positively towards ps, which is fine because maybe that's just how popular the brand is but it also bleeds over to there being way more fanatical, irrational fanboys of the ps type on this site.
So a
rational and considered conversation between intelligent
people about some of the mutual but
very specific issues of abstract painting is out, then?
He talked about how more than 85 percent of the world's
people get their daily values and norms from the stories they hear through their religions, so why wouldn't you try to take advantage of that pathway of communication, even though it is by definition not
very rational.
«Those [emails] are of concern, particularly when you have loved ones and it's clear that some of these
people out there are not
very rational.»
Once a
person is wound up it is
very difficult to have a
rational discussion.
It's
very hard for scientists to understand this, because they're highly
rational people, but in actual fact, no - one has ever been rationalised out of a belief... http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s3976695.htm
It's
very hard for scientists to understand this, because they're highly
rational people, but in actual fact, no - one has ever been rationalised out of a belief...
However I have not found
very much research addressing the reasonable question of whether current climate models provide the high accuracy that a
rational person should agree is needed to justify large scale social and economic adjustments.
It is a
very real example of what happens when
people look for scapegoats, aren't
rational and just downright want to lay blame on anyone but themselves.