Sentences with phrase «very real answer»

If you answered in the positive, and you really should have, Superhot is the very real answer to that very rhetorical question.

Not exact matches

«Genetic risk of gene tests, like [those performed at 23andMe], are very incomplete and don't give the real answers.»

I watch your video and sounds very real, even the pauses between prospect inputs and your answers looked very authentic.

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

The real question regarding religion and war is, does it help in making moral judgements on when to fight it and when not, and the answer is not very impressive.

By having the very real relationship I spoke of, I already know my God and know from his answers about the others.

That's actually a very easy question to answer since Obama is actually real (I've seen him), and Satan is a fictional character in a book.

So, I say, gods might exist but the probability is very low, and decreasing given the amount of time believers have been flailing about trying to make the irrational rational and how science provides better answers with real evidence, peer - reviewed under the scientific method.

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

Lot's of opinions but very short on real answers does not make you smart, just someone with a stronger belief in something that may or may not be correct.

-- The Babble says so — I don't know, but I will read The Babble some more and get back to you — Please tell me the right answer»cause I'm too lazy to do real home work myslef — My god has very powerful magic and can do anything!

So very few know the real answer.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«i turned down the whole world» is what Arsene tells us but let me tell you if he had performed like he have at Arsenal for the last ten years he wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes at any other clubs, Would Barca accept a 8 - 2 drubbing at Real or vice versa??? Would Barca accept 20 years of «trying» to win the cl??? would Barca accept half arsed players giving 50 percent at bramall lane or white hart lane???? would Barca accept more and more outlandish excuses for poor defeats??? Would Barca accepts wengers famous «Values»??? And would Barca accept to pay a very ordinary coach 10 mil a year to achieve the very minimum??? i think you know the answer.

The FSG Out group seem to have the answers to everything, but there's a very real possibility that if Liverpool were sold, we could well have owners like those at Arsenal, who rarely attend games, invest minimal capital, and siphon off resources.

This event focuses on the very real and viable answer to cloth diaper your children.

The real question — and one very few people try to answer — is «are they eating the same amount as they were before?»

While I can understand why she may say this (she didn't talk very much and her older sister answered many of the questions the doctor had for her before she had a real chance), I know my daughter and she is an introvert, like her dad.

The questions «what were the stated aims», «what was the real ideological intention», and «why did the policy not achieve the stated aims» give very different answers.

The answers they received from each technique agreed with one another very well, giving us confidence that they're measuring real changes in the brain.

The other waiter has made a very obvious assertion, but he is not answering the real question you were trying to ask, which (paraphrased) was «What outside event or activity is causing all these people to come into the restaurant now?»

The very place that teaches one how to prepare and inject their shots, answers questions about the HRT process and helps a person throughout their program treatment plan should also be the place where to buy real HGH injections with great confidence.

Anyway, it's all very challenging, and the only real answer I can see is to be as nourishing as possible while testing different eating strategies.

I am looking for a real woman who is ready to love me 100 % just as much as i am ready to give her my love.I am here for a real relationship and i am not the type that flirts around, so anyone who is flirting around might not be lucky with me, but if you are truly ready for a real relationship, don't get by, say something and this might be an answer to your prayers.I am from a very good background and where i live has influenced me so well that i know all that i am required of as a husband and will discharge my qualities accordingly.

HWP Height / weight proportionate IR Interracial IRL In Real Life ISO In search of J Jewish K Kids Kino L Lesbian LD Light drinker LDR Long Distance Relationship LDS Latter Day Saints (Mormon) LS Legally separated, or Light smoker M Male MBA Married but available MBC Married black couple MM Marriage minded MSM Men seeking men, or Men who have sex with men MSW Men seeking women MtF Male - to - female transgendered MWC Married white couple NA Native American NBM Never been married ND or N / D Non-drinker, No drinking, or No drugs Neg a backhanded compliment N / Drugs No drugs NK or N / K No kids NS or N / S Non-smoker NSA No strings attached NRE New Relationship Energy Open Relationship P Professional, or Parent PA Personal Attachment or Pleasing Appendage Pan pansexual Pansexual where gender is irrelevant Peacocking attracting attention through props and clothing PC Politically Correct, Personal Computer PD Public Display of Affection PDA Public Display of Affection Poly polyamory POSSLQ Person of opposite sex sharing living quarters RL Real Life, i.e. not online, or in - person S Single SBF Single black female SBiF Single bisexual female SBM Single black male SD Social drinker SGL Single SI Similar interests SO Significant Other SOH Sense of humor STDs Sexually transmitted diseases STIs Sexually transmitted infections STR Straight SWF Single white female SWM Single white male TG Transgendered TLC Tender loving care TS Transexual TV Transvestite Umfriend a sort of, not really friend VBD Very bad date W Widowed or White w / With WAA Will answer all Wingman see What is a Wingman?

Credit writer Liz Tigelaar and director Gary Fleder for answering that question with two very real responses.

This is the hardest question to answer when it comes to situations like these; what you see in a work of art has everything to do with who you are and what you bring to the work, and as I wrote in December, there's a very real sense in which nobody ever sees the same movie.

Cuesta keeps his film lively in the first hour with montages of real life footage and news coverage, reminding his audience that this story was very much a big deal, even if it's one which is perhaps today rarely spoken about (ask «Joe Public» who Oliver North is and I'd imagine the answers back up my statement) and in another highly complementary comparison I was often thinking about how Oliver Stone would have handled a film on the subject and character.

Most educators would agree that the focus is still very much on teaching kids to give the right answers to specific questions, but I don't personally believe that's ever been the real objective of education.

Students give very straightforward, honest answers, so this is a great way to get a real sense of what the school is all about.

The problem with the first two very logical business questions is that there are no real answers at this point.

Well the answer to at least one of them is here, the G - Slate Tablet is very real and very much coming to T - Mobile.

Tim Harris, a real estate broker in Chester, N.S., puts it more bluntly: â $ œThey do it, â $ he says, â $ œbecause they can afford it.â $ Having sold more than a few ultra-luxury waterfront homes to the Eastern Seaboardâ $ ™ s rich and famous, his firm, Tradewinds Realty, is expanding its territory to Costa Rica and Panama, in answer to client requests for their very own place in the sun.

@silver - saguaro If you believe this answer, please read the other answers which outline the very real risks of completing this transaction.

I prefer this answer due to the very real legal aspect.

Maureen is very committed to the Muzzle up Project and the blog reflects that dedication through real, informative blog posts that help to answer the reader's questions.

If the answer to many of these questions is yes, your dog may suffer from a very real thing: separation anxiety.

These aren't all questions I have answers to, but I've witnessed a very real gap in the way people are able to comprehend my current lifestyle.

If you're playing with a bad internet connection, then there's a very real chance that you could end up getting frozen or booted off of the game before you finish answering a question, or even before you get the question to begin with, so make sure that you have a steady connection for the best chance at winning the prize.

this was the one thing with move that seemed to stand on its own... I don't mind the idea of HD wii sports either, as long as it really is 1:1... that was my only real complaint with the wii when it released... there was motion control, but it was gimmicky and registered «wiggles» into canned animations... not to mention the gamecube visuals... still not sold on Move though... for me to really want one, I want to see what they are doing with shooters... Socom 4 and killzone 3 could be very special for core gamers and motion controls if they are done right... if you can aim on screen in true 1:1 fashion while sitting comfortably at a «normal» gaming distance... it could rearrange how I play first person shooters on a console... developers are saying the Move has input latency of 21ms, which is roughly half of a DS3... and second only to a wired mouse / keyboard... need to see how it works though, as it is not always that simple... just saying that if it does what its supposed to... it could end up being the answer to shooters on a console... as much as I like playing shooters with 2 sticks... I can't argue that I miss the days of a mouse and keyboard (as well as PC being the only platform to get the best shooters on... no longer the case by any means)... but with a first person shooter, there is no wiggle room... pun intended... it has to register every mm of movement on screen... and do it quickly... not sure if it can yet...

But you didn't answer my point — so try again: If someone claims that the science is a hoax but in fact it turns out to very real and very impactful, what «accountability» should be applied?

Ray's answer makes it obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and far from being explainable by simple, hand - made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.

very good question but awful answers, all they did was state the obvious and give no real insight on anything

If the answer to the first question is yes or if the answer to the second is no, the global warming debate becomes merely interesting, with very few real political consequences.

The Solar Union representative has continued to be very helpful, answering questions about how to follow the real time performance of the system monitoring capabilities are included in the package.

You can get some very interesting and sophisticated discussion and questions answered at Real Climate's blog though.

It is plain to see that the real answer was very likely (TM): There is insufficient data to make a confident estimate at this time.

I am aware of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a massive expansion of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage of growing concern about the very real problem of global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could more effectively be applied elsewhere).

The answer, of course, is none, since the vast majority of blogs and comments are read by very few, and almost never by those in a position to craft policy — i.e. those with real power.